Literature DB >> 30390512

Fully convolutional multi-scale residual DenseNets for cardiac segmentation and automated cardiac diagnosis using ensemble of classifiers.

Mahendra Khened1, Varghese Alex Kollerathu1, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi2.   

Abstract

Deep fully convolutional neural network (FCN) based architectures have shown great potential in medical image segmentation. However, such architectures usually have millions of parameters and inadequate number of training samples leading to over-fitting and poor generalization. In this paper, we present a novel DenseNet based FCN architecture for cardiac segmentation which is parameter and memory efficient. We propose a novel up-sampling path which incorporates long skip and short-cut connections to overcome the feature map explosion in conventional FCN based architectures. In order to process the input images at multiple scales and view points simultaneously, we propose to incorporate Inception module's parallel structures. We propose a novel dual loss function whose weighting scheme allows to combine advantages of cross-entropy and Dice loss leading to qualitative improvements in segmentation. We demonstrate computational efficacy of incorporating conventional computer vision techniques for region of interest detection in an end-to-end deep learning based segmentation framework. From the segmentation maps we extract clinically relevant cardiac parameters and hand-craft features which reflect the clinical diagnostic analysis and train an ensemble system for cardiac disease classification. We validate our proposed network architecture on three publicly available datasets, namely: (i) Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC-2017), (ii) Left Ventricular segmentation challenge (LV-2011), (iii) 2015 Kaggle Data Science Bowl cardiac challenge data. Our approach in ACDC-2017 challenge stood second place for segmentation and first place in automated cardiac disease diagnosis tasks with an accuracy of 100% on a limited testing set (n=50). In the LV-2011 challenge our approach attained 0.74 Jaccard index, which is so far the highest published result in fully automated algorithms. In the Kaggle challenge our approach for LV volume gave a Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) of 0.0127, which would have placed us tenth in the original challenge. Our approach combined both cardiac segmentation and disease diagnosis into a fully automated framework which is computationally efficient and hence has the potential to be incorporated in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools for clinical application.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated diagnosis; Cardiac MRI; Deep learning; Ensemble classifier; Fully convolutional densenets.; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30390512     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  31 in total

1.  A cascaded FC-DenseNet and level set method (FCDL) for fully automatic segmentation of the right ventricle in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Yang Luo; Lisheng Xu; Lin Qi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Automated single cardiomyocyte characterization by nucleus extraction from dynamic holographic images using a fully convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Ezat Ahmadzadeh; Keyvan Jaferzadeh; Seokjoo Shin; Inkyu Moon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  SOMA: Subject-, object-, and modality-adapted precision atlas approach for automatic anatomy recognition and delineation in medical images.

Authors:  Jieyu Li; Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Yubing Tong; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Using synthetic data generation to train a cardiac motion tag tracking neural network.

Authors:  Michael Loecher; Luigi E Perotti; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  A deep learning-based approach for automatic segmentation and quantification of the left ventricle from cardiac cine MR images.

Authors:  Hisham Abdeltawab; Fahmi Khalifa; Fatma Taher; Norah Saleh Alghamdi; Mohammed Ghazal; Garth Beache; Tamer Mohamed; Robert Keynton; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  L-CO-Net: Learned Condensation-Optimization Network for Segmentation and Clinical Parameter Estimation from Cardiac Cine MRI.

Authors:  S M Kamrul Hasan; Cristian A Linte
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

8.  Validation of a deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automate MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Julia Karr; Michael Cohen; Samuel A McQuiston; Teja Poorsala; Christopher Malozzi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Direct left-ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) computation with a fully convolutional network.

Authors:  Julia Kar; Michael V Cohen; Samuel A McQuiston; Teja Poorsala; Christopher M Malozzi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Deep Learning-based Automated Segmentation of Left Ventricular Trabeculations and Myocardium on Cardiac MR Images: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Axel Bartoli; Joris Fournel; Zakarya Bentatou; Gilbert Habib; Alain Lalande; Monique Bernard; Loïc Boussel; François Pontana; Jean-Nicolas Dacher; Badih Ghattas; Alexis Jacquier
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.