Literature DB >> 35725530

Predictors of silent hypoxia in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

Kayoko Hayakawa1, Shinichiro Morioka2, Yusuke Asai3, Shinya Tsuzuki4, Gen Yamada5, Setsuko Suzuki5, Nobuaki Matsunaga3, Norio Ohmagari6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Silent hypoxia (SH) is common in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Japan and other countries. Early identification of SH is important as more treatment options for COVID-19 have become available. This study aimed to identify predictors of SH using a nationwide COVID-19 registry of hospitalized patients.
METHODS: Adult patients who were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between January 2020 and June 2021 and who were hypoxic on admission (SpO2: 70-93%), not transferred from another facility, and who did not have disturbance of consciousness, confusion, or dementia, were included. SH was defined as hypoxia in the absence of shortness of breath/dyspnea upon admission. Predictors of SH were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: The study included 1904 patients, of whom 990 (52%) satisfied the criteria for SH. Compared to patients without SH, patients with SH were older, more likely to be female, and had a slightly higher SpO2 on admission. Compared to patients without SH, patients with SH had a lower prevalence of chronic lung disease (CLD) other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and obesity. Multivariable analysis revealed that the independent predictors of SH were older age, a shorter interval from symptom onset to admission, higher SpO2, and an absence of CLD or COPD.
CONCLUSIONS: The absence of underlying lung disease and older age were important predictors of SH. The results of this study, which is the largest such study reported to date in Japan, may help clarify the mechanism of SH.
Copyright © 2022 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Infection; Silent hypoxia

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35725530      PMCID: PMC9189118          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.065


Silent hypoxia (SH), also known as happy hypoxia, has been frequently observed in COVID-19 patients Japan and other countries [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. The early identification of SH and initiation of therapeutic interventions are important given that more treatment options for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) have now become available. This study was conducted to identify the predictive factors for SH using the nationwide COVID-19 registry of hospitalized patients (COVIREGI-JP). The patients who fulfilled the following criteria were included in the analysis: (1) ≥ 20 years of age, (2) no oxygen usage on admission, (3) 69% < SpO2 < 94% on room air, (4) no disturbance of consciousness (AVPU scale: alert or verbal), (5) no confusion or dementia, and (6) not a transferred patient. SH was defined as the absence of shortness of breath (SOB)/dyspnea upon admission. The data of patients, admitted between January 2020 and June 2021, which were fixed by September 30, 2021, were used as previously described [5]. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 25. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression, and independent predictors for the silent hypoxia were identified. Two–sided P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM-G-004147-00). The study included 1904 patients, of whom 990 (52%) satisfied the criteria for SH. In univariable analysis, compared to the non-SH group, the SH group had more female and older adult patients (Table 1 ). Alcohol consumption was more prevalent in the non-SH group than in the SH group. The patients from the SH group had a slightly higher SpO2 on admission, as well as a slightly lower temperature and heart rate than those in the non-SH group. The prevalence of chronic lung disease (CLD) other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and obesity, was lower in the SH group than in the non-SH group. The days from symptom onset (DSO) were shorter in the SH group than in the non-SH group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent predictors of SH were older age, shorter DSO, higher SpO2, and not having CLD or COPD.
Table 1

Predictors for silent hypoxia on admission among hypoxic COVID-19 patients.

ParametersSilent Hypoxiaa (n = 990)Non–Silent Hypoxiaa (n = 914)Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
ORP valuebORP valueb
Demographics
Age (years), median (IQR)71 (60–80)65 (54–76)1.02<0.0011.020.002
(1.02–1.03)(1.01–1.03)
Male sex617 (62.3%)663 (72.7%)0.62<0.0010.8 (0.58–1.11)0.179
(0.51–0.75)
Japanese race950 (97.2%)870 (96%)1.460.1471.5 (0.74–3.05)0.258
(0.88–2.42)
Current or previous smoker429 (51.5%)434 (54.5%)0.890.2321.010.93
(0.73–1.08)(0.76–1.35)
Alcoholic beverage drinker382 (51.8%)406 (57.5%)0.80.0311.020.92
(0.65–0.98)(0.76–1.36)
Days from symptom onset, median (IQR)6 (3–8)6 (4–9)0.93<0.0010.940.001
(0.91–0.96)(0.91–0.98)
Vital signs on admission
SpO2, median (IQR)92 (91–93)91 (89–93)1.16<0.0011.14<0.001
(1.12–1.2)(1.09–1.19)
Temperature in Celsius, median (IQR)37.4 (36.8–38.1)37.5 (36.9–38.3)0.880.0071.06 (0.92–1.22)0.392
(0.8–0.97)
Respiratory rate, median (IQR)20 (17–22)21 (18–24)1.000.5121.000.551
(1.00–1.00)(1.00–1.00)
Heart rate, median (IQR)89 (80–101)92 (82–103)0.99<0.0011.000.472
(0.98–0.99)(0.99–1.01)
Comorbiditiesc
Myocardial infarction33 (3.3%)32 (3.5%)0.950.841.000.992
(0.58–1.56)(0.46–2.14)
Congestive heart failure41 (4.1%)24 (2.6%)1.6 (0.96–2.67)0.0711.780.168
(0.79–4.02)
Peripheral vascular disease18 (1.8%)23 (2.5%)0.720.2960.43 (0.15–1.26)0.125
(0.39–1.34)
Cerebrovascular disease86 (8.7%)55 (6%)1.490.0271.140.64
(1.05–2.11)(0.66–1.98)
Chronic lung disease (excluding COPD)23 (2.3%)41 (4.5%)0.510.0100.270.004
(0.3–0.85)(0.11–0.66)
COPD50 (5.1%)62 (6.8%)0.730.110.35 (0.18–0.68)0.002
(0.5–1.07)
Asthma42 (4.2%)65 (7.1%)0.580.0070.670.154
(0.39–0.86)(0.39–1.16)
Liver disease33 (3.3%)29 (3.2%)1.050.8441.080.85
(0.63–1.75)(0.48–2.43)
Peptic ulcer disease11 (1.1%)7 (0.8%)1.460.4391.290.738
(0.56–3.77)(0.3–5.58)
Diabetes mellitus271 (27.4%)269 (29.4%)0.90.320.85 (0.63–1.16)0.303
(0.74–1.1)
Obesityd71 (7.2%)105 (11.5%)0.60.0010.980.927
(0.43–0.82)(0.64–1.51)
Severe renal dysfunction17 (1.7%)9 (1%)1.76 (0.78–3.96)0.1743.460.13
(0.69–17.25)
Solid tumors51 (5.2%)47 (5.1%)10.9930.650.205
(0.67–1.51)(0.33–1.27)
Metastatic solid tumors17 (1.7%)15 (1.6%)1.050.8970.750.594
(0.52–2.11)(0.27–2.14)
Leukemias or lymphomas6 (0.6%)10 (1.1%)0.550.2510.360.221
(0.2–1.52)(0.07–1.86)
Collagen disease16 (1.6%)20 (2.2%)0.730.3620.650.415
(0.38–1.43)(0.23–1.84)
Hypertension465 (47%)401 (43.9%)1.130.1751.010.936
(0.95–1.36)(0.76–1.35)
Dyslipidemia222 (22.4%)218 (23.9%)0.920.4611.050.758
(0.75–1.14)(0.77–1.44)

Presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Two–sided P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant (indicated as bold text).

Definitions were based on their Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, unless otherwise specified [12].

Based on the physician's diagnosis. Abbreviations. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio.

Predictors for silent hypoxia on admission among hypoxic COVID-19 patients. Presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated. Two–sided P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant (indicated as bold text). Definitions were based on their Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, unless otherwise specified [12]. Based on the physician's diagnosis. Abbreviations. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio. The results were partially similar to those in the study by García-Grimshaw et al., which identified DSO as a predictor of SH [6]. However, they were not concordant with the report by Alhusain et al., which did not include DSO or vitals on admission [7]. Both studies used different definitions of hypoxia and included symptoms as predictors. In the present study, although symptoms were excluded to avoid confounding effects, more comorbidities were considered. The correlation between the risk factors for severe COVID-19 and the predictors of SH was minimal [8]. Based on our results, patients with COPD and CLD were more likely to complain of SOB. Oxygen-requiring patients on admission were not included in the study; therefore, patients with advanced COPD or CLD were likely excluded. These findings suggest that patients with underlying pulmonary diseases that are not sufficiently advanced for them to be accustomed to hypoxia, are less likely to develop SH because they tend to be more aware of their respiratory status. Various hypotheses regarding the pathomechanism of SH have been proposed [[9], [10], [11]]. The lung perfusion, sensory feedback, and central neural regulation of breathing are likely to be affected in patients with underlying lung abnormalities. The findings of the present study require further basic investigation and validation in non-Japanese cohorts. Limitations of this study include the use of registry data, which may have resulted in selection bias, as previously reported [5]. Although we performed multivariable analysis, there may be some residual confounding. In conclusion, in a large cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the absence of underlying lung disease and age were important predictors of SH. The results of this study, which included the largest number of reported cases, may help clarify the mechanism of SH. Potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE form for the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Conflicts that the editors considered relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Funding

This research was funded by the Health and Labor Sciences Research grant, “Research for risk assessment and implementation of crisis management functions for emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.” K.H was the chief investigator and responsible for the data analysis. S.M contributed to the study design and ethical approval. Y.A, S.T, and G.Y reviewed the statistical analyses. K.H drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the reviewing and finalization of the manuscript.
  12 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Prevalence and outcome of silent hypoxemia in COVID-19.

Authors:  Mattia Busana; Alessio Gasperetti; Lorenzo Giosa; Giovanni B Forleo; Marco Schiavone; Gianfranco Mitacchione; Cecilia Bonino; Paolo Villa; Massimo Galli; Claudio Tondo; Ardan Saguner; Peter Steiger; Antonio Curnis; Antonio Dello Russo; Francesco Pugliese; Massimo Mancone; John J Marini; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Risk factors associated with asymptomatic hypoxemia among COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study using the nationwide Japanese registry, COVIREGI-JP.

Authors:  Yutaro Akiyama; Shinichiro Morioka; Yusuke Asai; Lubna Sato; Setsuko Suzuki; Sho Saito; Nobuaki Matsunaga; Kayoko Hayakawa; Norio Ohmagari
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 4.  Prevalence, Presentation and Outcomes of Silent Hypoxemia in COVID-19.

Authors:  Amélia Ribeiro; Mauro Mendonça; Cláudia Sabina Sousa; Miguel Trigueiro Barbosa; Mário Morais-Almeida
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Clinical and radiological findings of silent hypoxia among COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Ayako Okuhama; Masahiro Ishikane; Masatoshi Hotta; Lubna Sato; Yutaro Akiyama; Shinichiro Morioka; Setsuko Suzuki; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Makiko Yamamoto; Katsuji Teruya; Shinyu Izumi; Norio Ohmagari
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.211

6.  Characteristics and predictors for silent hypoxemia in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Miguel García-Grimshaw; Fernando Daniel Flores-Silva; Erwin Chiquete; Carlos Cantú-Brito; Anaclara Michel-Chávez; Alma Poema Vigueras-Hernández; Rogelio Domínguez-Moreno; Oswaldo Alan Chávez-Martínez; Samantha Sánchez-Torres; Osvaldo Alexis Marché-Fernández; Alejandra González-Duarte
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.145

7.  Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalisation in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19 in Japan.

Authors:  Mari Terada; Hiroshi Ohtsu; Sho Saito; Kayoko Hayakawa; Shinya Tsuzuki; Yusuke Asai; Nobuaki Matsunaga; Satoshi Kutsuna; Wataru Sugiura; Norio Ohmagari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  The pathophysiology of 'happy' hypoxemia in COVID-19.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Dhont; Eric Derom; Eva Van Braeckel; Pieter Depuydt; Bart N Lambrecht
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2020-07-28

9.  Modeling lung perfusion abnormalities to explain early COVID-19 hypoxemia.

Authors:  Jacob Herrmann; Vitor Mori; Jason H T Bates; Béla Suki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.