| Literature DB >> 35722154 |
Jing Miao1, Mengting Liu2, Jie Ma3, Han Wang1.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the application effect of continuous nursing combined with comfort nursing on patients with colorectal cancer chemotherapy and its influence on sleep quality and immune function.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722154 PMCID: PMC9200510 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9647325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups.
| Study group ( | Control group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 26/22 | 25/23 | 0.042 | 0.838 |
| Age ( | 52.16 ± 4.51 | 52.21 ± 4.48 | 0.054 | 0.957 |
| BMI ( | 21.62 ± 1.05 | 21.58 ± 1.15 | 0.178 | 0.859 |
| Disease type | 0.300 | 0.584 | ||
| Rectal | 39 (81.25%) | 41 (85.42%) | ||
| Colon | 9 (18.75%) | 7 (14.58%) | ||
| Pathological type | 0.335 | 0.563 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 42 (87.50%) | 40 (83.33%) | ||
| Squamous carcinoma | 6 (12.50%) | 8 (16.67%) | ||
| Residence | 0.677 | 0.411 | ||
| City | 23 (47.92%) | 19 (39.58%) | ||
| Rural | 25 (52.08%) | 29 (60.42%) |
Treatment compliance (n, %).
| Radiotherapy adherence | Physical examination | Scientific diet | Self-protection | Disease recognition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study group ( | 44 (91.67) | 47 (97.92) | 43 (89.58) | 42 (87.50) | 47 (97.92) |
| Control group ( | 36 (75.00) | 39 (81.25) | 35 (72.92) | 33 (68.75) | 40 (83.33) |
|
| 4.800 | 7.144 | 4.376 | 4.937 | 6.008 |
|
| 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.036 | 0.026 | 0.014 |
Figure 1Comparison of GAD-7 scores and PSQI scores, P < 0.001.
T cell subsets ( ± s).
| Group | CD4+ (%) | CD8+ (%) | CD4+/CD8+ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| Study group ( | 32.46 ± 4.27 | 43.27 ± 3.28 | 22.81 ± 4.26 | 32.18 ± 3.17 | 1.26 ± 0.24 | 1.51 ± 0.35 |
| Control group ( | 32.52 ± 4.21 | 36.78 ± 3.57 | 22.85 ± 4.31 | 27.47 ± 3.26 | 1.31 ± 0.27 | 1.36 ± 0.33 |
|
| 0.069 | 9.2275 | 0.046 | 7.176 | 0.959 | 2.160 |
|
| 0.945 | <0.001 | 0.964 | <0.001 | 0.340 | 0.033 |
Nursing satisfaction (n, %).
| Group | Very satisfied | Satisfied | Generally satisfied | Unsatisfied | Total satisfaction rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study group ( | 21 (43.75) | 19 (39.58) | 6 (12.50) | 2 (4.17) | 46 (95.83) |
| Control group ( | 16 (33.33) | 15 (31.25) | 8 (16.67) | 9 (18.75) | 39 (81.25) |
|
| 5.031 | ||||
|
| 0.025 | ||||
Quality of life scores ( ± s, points).
| Group | Psychology | Physiology | Spirit | Environment | Social relation | Independence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study group ( | 64.38 ± 3.19 | 70.27 ± 3.65 | 68.92 ± 4.27 | 66.38 ± 3.28 | 66.26 ± 4.27 | 60.28 ± 4.28 |
| Control group ( | 58.37 ± 3.27 | 62.18 ± 3.28 | 60.27 ± 4.19 | 57.82 ± 3.56 | 59.28 ± 4.28 | 52.36 ± 3.76 |
|
| 9.115 | 11.422 | 10.018 | 12.252 | 7.999 | 9.632 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |