| Literature DB >> 35722127 |
Chongying Jin1,2,3, Ryo Torii4, Anantharaman Ramasamy1,3, Vincenzo Tufaro1,3,5, Callum D Little6, Klio Konstantinou7, Yi Ying Tan4, Nathan A L Yap8, Jackie Cooper3, Tom Crake1, Constantinos O'Mahony1,9, Roby Rakhit6, Mohaned Egred10, Javed Ahmed10, Grigoris Karamasis7, Lorenz Räber11, Andreas Baumbach1,3,12, Anthony Mathur1,3, Christos V Bourantas1,3,9.
Abstract
Background: Intravascular imaging has been used to assess the morphology of lesions causing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in native vessels (NV) and identify differences between plaques that ruptured (PR) and caused an event and those that ruptured without clinical manifestations. However, there is no data about the morphological and physiological characteristics of neoatherosclerotic plaques that ruptured (PR-NA) which constitute a common cause of stent failure.Entities:
Keywords: computational fluid dynamics (CFD); endothelial shear stress; neoatherosclerosis; optical coherence tomography; plaque rupture; plaque structural stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722127 PMCID: PMC9204481 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.890799
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
FIGURE 1Representative images and methodology of OCT morphology analysis. The upper part is a representative longitudinal diagram of a ruptured plaque (blue dots represent for macrophages while yellow sharp stars for cholesterol crystals, gray curved lines for microchannels), panels (A–E) are cross sections corresponding to the lesion segment while analyzed at 0.4 mm interval. (A) The reference segment of the vessel, red line indicates the lumen surface while green line indicates the EEM. (B) Calcification tissue in the plaque, the arc indicates the calcific arc. (C) Lipid tissue in the plaque, the arc indicates the lipid arc, the area enclosed by the blue line indicates the fibrous cap. Yellow and green lines which are vertical to the lumen border are maximum and minimal cap thickness respectively. (D) Plaque rupture and thrombus. Red line represents the lumen surface while red dash line indicates the lumen surface before plaque rupture. The white arc represent rupture circumferential extend, while yellow arc indicates thrombus circumferential distribution for generating the thrombus score. Line with arrowheads represents the depth of rupture. (E) Macrophages, cholesterol crystals, and microchannels. The bigger arrow points to the cholesterol crystals while the smaller arrow points to the microchannel. Arcs indicate the arc of macrophages.
FIGURE 2Schematic diagram showing the calculation of RG RG = (R-R)/L while RG = (R-R)/L.
FIGURE 3Study flowchart.
Baseline demographics of the studied population.
| PR-NV group ( | PR-NA group ( | ||
| Mean age (years) | 64.5 ± 13.1 | 66.7 ± 12.8 | 0.911 |
| Males | 45 (80.4) | 19 (79.2) | 0.904 |
|
| |||
| Diabetes | 16 (28.6) | 6 (25.0) | 0.745 |
| Hypertension | 29 (51.8) | 14 (58.3) | 0.593 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 30 (53.6) | 17 (70.8) | 0.153 |
| Current smoking | 19 (33.9) | 5 (20.8) | 0.245 |
| Previous MI | 10 (17.9) | 9 (37.5) | 0.060 |
|
| 0.117 | ||
| STEMI | 29 (51.8) | 17 (70.8) | |
| NSTEMI | 27 (48.2) | 7 (29.2) | |
|
| |||
| Anti-platelet therapy | 26 (46.4) | 18 (75.0) |
|
| Aspirin | 21 (37.5) | 17 (70.8) |
|
| P2Y12 inhibitor | 5 (8.9) | 5 (20.8) | 0.157 |
| Statins | 27 (48.2) | 19 (79.2) |
|
| ACEI/ARB | 24 (42.9) | 15 (62.5) | 0.144 |
| β-Blockers | 19 (33.9) | 14 (58.3) | 0.051 |
|
| 0.896 | ||
| LAD | 29 (51.8) | 14 (58.3) | |
| LCx | 12 (21.4) | 3 (12.5) | |
| RCA | 15 (26.8) | 7 (29.2) | |
Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. MI, myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery. The values in bold type indicate that they are statistically significantly with p-value of <0.05.
Geometrical and morphological characteristics of the ruptured plaques in the native and stented segments.
| PR-NV group ( | PR-NA group ( | ||
|
| |||
| Geometrical characteristics | |||
| Lesion length (mm) | 16.3 ± 6.0 | 14.8 ± 11.1 | 0.532 |
| MLA (mm2) | 2.93 ± 2.03 | 2.00 ± 1.26 |
|
| Proximal reference area (mm2) | 9.21 ± 4.11 | 5.80 ± 2.99 |
|
| Distal reference area (mm2) | 7.78 ± 3.87 | 4.96 ± 2.11 |
|
| Area stenosis (%) | 66.4 ± 15.4 | 61.6 ± 18.1 | 0.227 |
| Upstream RG | 0.111 ± 0.069 | 0.105 ± 0.076 | 0.768 |
| Downstream RG | 0.112 ± 0.093 | 0.121 ± 0.117 | 0.715 |
|
| |||
| TCFA phenotype ( | 41 (73.2) | 14 (58.3) | 0.191 |
| ThCFA phenotype ( | 13 (23.2) | 9 (37.5) | 0.406 |
| Minimal FCT (μm) | 49 ± 22 | 60 ± 38 | 0.222 |
| Mean FCT (μm) | 186 ± 65 | 232 ± 80 |
|
| Mean lipid arc (°) | 150.5 ± 49.4 | 167.3 ± 34.0 | 0.141 |
| Lipid length (mm) | 6.1 ± 5.3 | 7.8 ± 8.6 | 0.280 |
| Lipid index | 62.2 ± 49.1 | 97.4 ± 47.8 | 0.005 |
| Presence of calcific tissue ( | 31 (55.4) | 5 (20.8) |
|
| Mean arc of calcific tissue (°) | 62.8 ± 31.0 | 79.2 ± 14.7 | 0.309 |
| Calcific index | 29.9 ± 34.1 | 10.0 ± 4.0 |
|
| Presence of macrophages ( | 52 (92.9) | 21 (87.5) | 0.440 |
| Spotted macrophages ( | 50 (89.3) | 20 (83.3) | 0.464 |
| Lined macrophages ( | 48 (85.7) | 18 (75.0) | 0.251 |
| Lined macrophages index | 12.1 ± 11.1 | 26.6 ± 33.9 | 0.091 |
| Presence of cholesterol crystals ( | 19 (34.5) | 8 (33.0) | 0.917 |
| Presence of microchannels ( | 23 (41.4) | 3 (12.5) |
|
| Number of rupture sites | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.473 |
| Length of plaque rupture (mm) | 2.4 ± 2.2 | 1.9 ± 2.0 | 0.359 |
| Depth of plaque rupture (mm) | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
|
| Arc of rupture (°) | 58.7 ± 35.1 | 64.7 ± 31.5 | 0.476 |
| Rupture extent index | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.544 |
| Presence of thrombus ( | 43 (76.8) | 21 (87.5) | 0.275 |
| Thrombus score | 21.8 ± 18.3 | 21.5 ± 17.3 | 0.948 |
|
| |||
| Frames portraying TCFA ( | 391 (16.9) | 121 (13.4) |
|
| Frames portraying ThCFA ( | 458(19.9) | 344 (38.1) |
|
| Frames portraying calcific tissue ( | 433 (18.8) | 20 (2.2) |
|
| Frames portraying macrophages ( | 735 (31.9) | 222 (24.6) |
|
| Frames portraying spotted macrophages ( | 440 (19.1) | 112 (12.4) |
|
| Frames portraying lined macrophages ( | 411 (17.8) | 138 (15.3) | 0.087 |
| Frames portraying microchannels ( | 84 (3.6) | 28 (3.1) | 0.453 |
| Frames portraying cholesterol crystals ( | 40 (1.7) | 30 (3.3) |
|
| Frames portraying plaque rupture ( | 334 (14.5) | 114 (12.6) | 0.173 |
| Frames portraying thrombus ( | 576 (25.0) | 232 (25.7) | 0.671 |
Results are presented at a lesion- and frame-level. MLA, minimum lumen area; RG, radius gradient; TCFA, thin cap fibroatheroma; ThCFA, thick cap fibroatheroma; FCT, fibrous cap thickness. The values in bold type indicate that they are statistically significantly with p-value of <0.05.
FIGURE 4Main results of lesion level-analysis and representative images. The images are presented as pairs from PR-NV and PR-NA groups. (A,A′) The reference segment, PR-NV group had larger proximal and distal reference area. (B,B′) The MLA site, PR-NV group reveals larger MLA than PR-NA group, while the two groups have similar AS%. (C,C′) Typical fibroatheroma and cholesterol crystals images, arcs indicate the lipid tissue while the yellow arrows are pointing at the cholesterol crystals. Blue lines draw the fibrous cap. PR-NV group reveals smaller mean FCT and lipid index, but similar incidence of cholesterol crystals compares to PR-NA group. (D,D′) Representative plaque rupture images, arcs indicate the ruptured cavity, PR-NV group reveals similar rupture extend index with PR-NA group. (E,E′) Typical calcification images. Arcs indicate the calcific tissue, PR-NV groups had bigger calcific index than PR-NA group. (F,F′) Macrophages and microchannels. Yellow arrows are pointing to the microchannels while arcs indicate the macrophages. PR-NV group has similar incidence of macrophages but more incidence of microchannels than PR-NA group.
Location of plaque rupture.
| PR-NV group ( | PR-NA group ( | ||
| Distance to MLA site (mm) | 3.6 ± 3.9 | 2.6 ± 3.6 | 0.679 |
| Upstream ( | 26 (40.6) | 5 (17.2) | |
| Center ( | 18 (28.1) | 2 (6.9) | |
| Shoulder ( | 8 (12.5) | 3 (10.3) | |
| Throat ( | 30 (46.9) | 20 (69.0) | |
| Center ( | 12 (18.8) | 10 (34.5) | |
| Shoulder ( | 18 (28.1) | 10 (34.5) | |
| Downstream ( | 8 (12.5) | 4 (13.8) | |
| Center ( | 3 (4.7) | 0 (0) | |
| Shoulder ( | 5 (7.8) | 4 (13.8) |
FIGURE 5Computational physiological analysis results. (A) The pressure drop across the model is 0.95 and 2.03 mmHg for native and stented vessel, respectively. (B) ESS distribution of the vessel. The stented model reveals higher maximum and minimum ESS value (19.1 vs. 11.0 Pa and 0.32 vs. 0.04 Pa, respectively). The maximum ESS value was located main at the MLA in both two models and 28.5% of the culprit lesion model in the stented segment and 9.0% of the culprit lesion model in NV was exposed to high ESS (>7 Pa). (C,D) PSS analysis results. The maximum superficial PSS in both models were over the thinner segment of the fibrous cap proximally to the MLA and was 95.1 kPa in the native and 38.8 kPa in the stented segment. A total of 95.1 kPa was also the maximum PSS value of the native model while in the stented model the highest PSS was 58.7 kPa in the vicinity of stent struts.