| Literature DB >> 35719653 |
Siyu Wang1, Min Li1, Soo Boon Ng2.
Abstract
Intelligent health diagnosis for young children aims at maintaining and promoting the healthy development of young children, aiming to make young children have a healthy state and provide a better future for their physical and mental health development. The biological basis of intelligence is the structure and function of human brain and the key to improve the intelligence level of infants is to improve the quality of brain development, especially the early development of brain. Based on machine learning and health information statistics, this paper studies the development of infant health diagnosis and intelligence, physical and mental health. Pre-process the sample data, and use the filtering method based on machine learning and health information statistics for feature screening. Compared with traditional statistical methods, machine learning and health information statistical methods can better obtain the hidden information in the big data of children's physical and mental health development, and have better learning ability and generalization ability. The machine learning theory is used to analyze and mine the infant's health diagnosis and intelligence development, establish a health state model, and intuitively show people the health status of their infant's physical and mental health development by means of data. Moreover, the accumulation of these big data is very important in the field of medical and health research driven by big data.Entities:
Keywords: big data; health information statistics; infant health diagnosis; intelligence development; machine learning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719653 PMCID: PMC9201248 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.846598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the structure of infant intelligent health diagnosis and intelligence development.
Figure 2Training flow chart of logistic regression algorithm model.
The comparison of the performance of data after three classification models applied to health information statistics for children's health diagnosis and intelligence development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Logistic | 0.602 | 0.935 | 0.733 | 0.813 | 0.895 |
| Random | 0.735 | 0.907 | 0.812 | 0.855 | 0.943 |
| forest | |||||
| SVM | 0.735 | 0.889 | 0.804 | 0.848 | 0.896 |
The performance comparison of data processed by health diagnosis and intelligence development of children with three classification models applied to health information statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic | 0.605 | 0.931 | 0.730 | 0.816 | 0.892 |
| Random | 0.738 | 0.913 | 0.815 | 0.857 | 0.947 |
| forest | |||||
| SVM | 0.736 | 0.892 | 0.814 | 0.847 | 0.899 |
Comparison of health diagnosis and intelligence development of children in kindergarten a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||
| Small class | 156 | 58 | 37 | 1.508 | 0.221 |
| Middle shift | 168 | 67 | 40 | 3.36 | 0.065 |
| Taipan | 197 | 89 | 45 | 4.571 | 0.064 |
Logistic regression model evaluation of basic data and combined data.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Basic data | Training set | 74.39 | 75.78 | 73.47 | 74.60 | 82.24 |
| Test set | 74.41 | 75.05 | 73.05 | 74.04 | 81.33 | |
| Combined data | Training set | 74.91 | 75.60 | 75.28 | 75.45 | 84.18 |
| Test set | 77.32 | 78.62 | 74.98 | 76.75 | 83.66 | |
Figure 3Health information statistics of logistic regression combined data and basic data.
Figure 4Health information statistics of logistic regression combined data and basic data.
Figure 5Curve representations of three kernel functions of machine learning basic data and health information statistics.
Figure 7Curve representation of three kernel functions of machine learning basic data and health information statistics.
Optimal parameter combination of different kernel functions modeling results of machine learning basic data and health information statistics.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Ploy kernel function | Training set | 72.78 | 86.87 | 55.17 | 67.45 | 84.18 |
| C = 0.1, degree = 3 gamma = 0.01 | Test set | 71.63 | 83.72 | 53.63 | 65.37 | 80.45 |
| Gaussian kernel function | Training set | 76.63 | 78.72 | 74.48 | 76.54 | 84.28 |
| C = 1, gamma = 0.01 | Test set | 76.23 | 77.68 | 73.53 | 75.55 | 82.57 |
| Sigmoid kernel function | Training set | 73.14 | 75.15 | 71.03 | 73.03 | 79.98 |
| C = 0.1, gamma = 0.1 | Test set | 73.44 | 74.54 | 71.11 | 72.78 | 80.73 |
Modeling results of different kernel functions of SVM under machine learning combined data.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Ploy kernel function | Training set | 83.76 | 88.52 | 78.45 | 83.18 | 93.05 |
| C = 0.1, degree = 3 gamma = 0.01 | Test set | 76.11 | 80.44 | 68.92 | 74.24 | 82.31 |
| Gaussian kernel function | Training set | 78.12 | 79.22 | 77.53 | 78.37 | 86.52 |
| C = 1, gamma = 0.01 | Test set | 77.32 | 78.91 | 73.50 | 76.64 | 83.76 |
| Sigmoid kernel function | Training set | 73.40 | 78.91 | 64.83 | 71.21 | 81.53 |
| C = 0.1, gamma = 0.1 | Test set | 75.38 | 78.44 | 66.51 | 72.96 | 82.45 |
Figure 8The ROC curve representation of three kernel functions under machine learning combined data.
Figure 10ROC curve performance of three kernel functions under machine learning combined data.