Literature DB >> 35719225

Start Fast, Swim Faster, Turn Fastest: Section Analyses and Normative Data for Individual Medley.

Dennis-Peter Born1,2, Michael Romann2, Thomas Stöggl3,4.   

Abstract

The aims of the study were to provide benchmarks and normative data for 100 m, 200 m, and 400 m short-course individual medley (IM) races, investigate differences between the various swimming strokes and turns involved in IM, and quantify the effect and contribution of various race sections on swimming performance. All IM races (n = 320) at the 2019 European Short-Course Swimming Championships were video monitored and digitized with interrater reliability described by a mean intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.968. Normative data were provided for the eight finalists of each event (FINA points = 886 ± 37) and the eight slowest swimmers from each event (FINA points = 688 ± 53). Contribution and effects of race sections on swimming performance were investigated using stepwise regression analysis based on all races of each event. Regression analysis explained 97-100% of total variance in race time and revealed turn time (β ≥ 0.53) as distinguishing factor in short-course IM races in addition to swim velocity (β ≥ -0.28). Start time only affected 100 m (β ≥ 0.14) and 200 m (β ≥ 0.04) events. Fastest turn times were found for the butterfly/backstroke turn. Breaststroke showed slowest swim velocities and no difference between fastest and slowest 100 m IM swimmers. Therefore, breaststroke may provide largest potential for future development in IM race times. Correlation analyses revealed that distance per stroke (r ≥ -0.39, P < 0.05) rather than stroke rate (r ≤ -0.18, P > 0.05) is a performance indicator and may be used by coaches and performance analysts to evaluate stroke mechanics in male IM swimmers despite its more complex assessment. Performance analysts, coaches, and swimmers may use the present normative data to establish minimal and maximal requirements for European Championship participation and to create specific drills in practice. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acyclic phases; elite athlete; race analysis; reference values; swimming

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35719225      PMCID: PMC9157519          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   4.017


  28 in total

1.  Underwater and surface strategies of 200 m world level swimmers.

Authors:  Santiago Veiga; Andreu Roig
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Training Regimes and Recovery Monitoring Practices of Elite British Swimmers.

Authors:  Scott Pollock; Nadia Gaoua; Michael J Johnston; Karl Cooke; Olivier Girard; Katya N Mileva
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The biomechanics of freestyle and butterfly turn technique in elite swimmers.

Authors:  Emily Nicol; Kevin Ball; Elaine Tor
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Start and Turn Performances of Competitive Swimmers in Sprint Butterfly Swimming.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Bjørn Harald Olstad
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Pacing in Swimming: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katie E McGibbon; D B Pyne; M E Shephard; K G Thompson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Start and turn performances of elite sprinters at the 2016 European Championships in swimming.

Authors:  Jorge E Morais; Daniel A Marinho; Raul Arellano; Tiago M Barbosa
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.832

7.  Comparison of starts and turns of national and regional level swimmers by individualized-distance measurements.

Authors:  Santiago Veiga; Antonio Cala; Pablo G Frutos; Enrique Navarro
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.832

8.  The effect of course length on individual medley swimming performance in national and international athletes.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Thomas Rosemann; Romuald Lepers; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Quality versus Quantity Debate in Swimming: Perceptions and Training Practices of Expert Swimming Coaches.

Authors:  Frank J Nugent; Thomas M Comyns; Giles D Warrington
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Multigenerational performance development of male and female top-elite swimmers-A global study of the 100 m freestyle event.

Authors:  Aylin K Post; Ruud H Koning; Chris Visscher; Marije T Elferink-Gemser
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 4.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.