| Literature DB >> 35719152 |
Chunyu Li1, Junyu Lin1, Tianmi Yang1, Huifang Shang1.
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have suggested green tea intake was associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, whether green tea intake has an effect on PD progression is unknown. To evaluate the role of green tea intake in PD progression, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of green tea intake (N = 64,949), age at onset (N = 28,568) and progression (N = 4,093) of PD. One standard deviation increase in genetically determined green tea intake was significantly associated with slower progression to dementia (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.94, P: 3.48E-04) after the Bonferroni correction. Meanwhile, higher green tea intake was nominally associated with slower progression to depression, and lower risk of dementia, depression, hyposmia and insomnia at baseline. The results were robust under all sensitivity analyses. These results might facilitate novel therapeutic targets to slow down the progression of PD in clinical trials, and have clinical implications for patients with PD.Entities:
Keywords: Mendelian randomization; Parkinson's disease; age at onset; green tea intake; progression
Year: 2022 PMID: 35719152 PMCID: PMC9199515 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.848223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Forest plot showing Mendelian randomization analysis results to evaluate the causal association between green tea intake and progression of PD. Results above the dashed line are for symptoms collected at baseline, while results below the dashed line are from survival analysis on symptom progression during follow-up. SEADL, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale; HY-3, Hoehn Yahr scale 3 or greater; RBD, REM sleep behavior disorder; SEADL70, SEADL of 70 or less. aDenotes statistical significance, while bdenotes nominal significance.
Figure 2Mendelian randomization analysis results for green tea intake and dementia of PD. (A) Forest plot showing Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis results to evaluate the causal association between green tea intake and progression to dementia using four methods. (B) Scatter plot of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) potential effects on green tea intake and dementia of PD. The 95% CI for the effect size on green tea intake is shown as vertical lines, while the 95% CI for the effect size on dementia of PD is shown as horizontal lines. The slope of fitted lines represents the estimated MR effect per method. (C) Funnel plot for green tea intake shows the estimation using the inverse of the standard error of the causal estimate with each individual SNP as a tool. The vertical line represents the estimated causal effect obtained using IVW and MR-Egger methods.
Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy analyses between green tea intake and PD progression.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Constipation | 8.51 | 12 | 0.74 | 0.12 | 0.2 | 0.55 | 0.78 |
| Dementia | 7.96 | 17 | 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.2 | 0.51 | 0.96 |
| Depression | 4.38 | 10 | 0.93 | −0.62 | 0.81 | 0.47 | 0.92 |
| Dyskinesia | 7.2 | 10 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.7 |
| HY-3 | 9.28 | 10 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.49 |
| Hyposmia | 6.33 | 14 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.97 |
| Insomnia | 7.26 | 14 | 0.92 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Motor fluctuation | 8.46 | 10 | 0.58 | −0.07 | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.56 |
| RBD | 11.06 | 12 | 0.52 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.53 |
| Daytime sleepiness | 10.11 | 10 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Age at onset | 2.63 | 4 | 0.62 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.92 | 0.64 |
| HY | 8.93 | 19 | 0.98 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.98 |
| SEADL | 18.17 | 16 | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.6 | 0.27 | 0.33 |
| UPDRS1 | 15.04 | 12 | 0.24 | 2.75E−03 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 0.28 |
| UPDRS2 | 13.95 | 12 | 0.3 | −0.24 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.3 |
| UPDRS3 | 12.23 | 16 | 0.73 | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.79 |
| UPDRS4 | 11.01 | 9 | 0.28 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 0.51 | 0.3 |
| UPDRS | 9 | 17 | 0.94 | −0.07 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.94 |
| Constipation | 8.87 | 8 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.34 |
| Dementia | 10.72 | 13 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.67 |
| Depression | 2.61 | 6 | 0.86 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.7 | 0.88 |
| Dyskinesia | 5.72 | 11 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.97 | 0.9 |
| HY-3 | 13.71 | 17 | 0.69 | −0.002 | 0.12 | 0.99 | 0.67 |
| Insomnia | 9.19 | 13 | 0.76 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.76 |
| Motor fluctuation | 10.98 | 14 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.92 | 70 |
| RBD | 14.12 | 13 | 0.37 | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.36 |
| SEADL70 | 7.45 | 14 | 0.92 | −0.07 | 0.23 | 0.76 | 0.94 |
| Daytime sleepiness | 15.15 | 12 | 0.23 | −0.06 | 0.2 | 0.78 | 0.17 |
IVW, Inverse variance weighted; Q, Cochran's Q test estimate; df, Cochran's Q test degrees of freedom; SE, standard error.
Results above the dashed line were for symptoms collected at baseline, while results below the dashed line were from survival analysis on symptom progression during follow-up.