Literature DB >> 35714395

Neonatal outcomes related to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in French Guiana: A case-control study.

N Elenga1, M-J Wandji2, J Siban3, M Nacher4, M Demar5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the neonatal outcomes related to maternal SARS-COV-2 infection.
METHODS: In this study, we identified newborns born between May 14 and August 31, 2020, to mothers who were PCR-SRAS-CoV-2 positive at the time of delivery. From the cohort of 974 infants, we performed a nested case-control study.
RESULTS: During the study period, 133 (13.7%) mothers were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Among the 35 pregnant women with COVID-19 symptoms (26.3%), cough was the most common symptom, present in half of the cases. Four of them have progressed to critical pneumonia requiring transfer to intensive care unit. The neonates from mothers with positive SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR, were routinely tested for COVID-19 within the first 24 h after labor, and 3 other newborns tested in the presence of symptoms. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to preterm birth, meconium-stained amniotic fluid distress, and neonatal asphyxia. Most infants were breastfed at birth, regardless of their mothers' COVID-19 status. In COVID-19-positive pregnant women admitted to intensive care unit, the proportion of preterm births (OR=12.5 [1.7-90.5]), fetal death in utero (OR=25.9 [2.2-305]) and admission in neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR=13.4 [3.0-60]), appeared higher than the controls. No maternal deaths were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest little neonatal morbidity associated with maternal COVID-19, except for those born to mothers admitted to intensive care unit. However, under breastfeeding conditions with rigorous hygiene precautions and parental education, the risk of transmission of SARS-COV-2 virus to the newborn was very low.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breastfeeding; Low risk; Mild infection; Newborn; SARS-COV-2 positive mother

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35714395      PMCID: PMC9190176          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Public Health        ISSN: 1876-0341            Impact factor:   7.537


Introduction

The global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Since then, several publications have focused on the outcome of newborns of mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection [2], [3], [4]. Pregnant women are considered a high-risk group for CoronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the effects of the virus on the mother and fetus may be of concern. It is now known that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to newborns occurs primarily via respiratory droplets during the postnatal period when they are exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infected parents or caregivers [5]. Regarding the possibility of intrauterine or perinatal transmission, there is currently no solid data to confirm this hypothesis [6], [7]. Most studies confirm that clinical symptoms in newborns with COVID-19 are most often mild and the outcome favorable. [2-4]The outcomes of neonates of women infected with SARS-COV2 has been poorly reported. Most often, the newborn is critically ill from sepsis, preterm birth or perinatal asphyxia, rather than SARS-CoV-2 infection [5]. Although a newborn's risk of developing COVID-19 during the perinatal period is unknown [8], [9], [10], best practices for infection control in mother-newborn couples should drastically reduce the transmission of SARS COV-2 to newborns [11], [12]. The present study aims to assess the neonatal outcomes related to maternal SARS COV-2 infection, in the context of breastfeeding as part of routine care.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

In this prospective study, we included newborns born between May 14th and August 31st, 2020, at Cayenne, French Guiana, to mothers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by routine nasopharyngeal swab testing at the time of delivery. Due to the risk of inadvertent exposure of health care providers to SARS-CoV-2 by asymptomatic pregnant women and the concern about delivery symptoms, an early warning system was implemented. Thus, particular vigilance has been made in the presence of symptoms such as aches, diarrhea that may mimic those of COVID-19. Universal screening of all pregnant women presenting in our hospital has been implemented in our gynecology and obstetrics unit and in the labor and delivery units since May 1, 2020. The mode of delivery of pregnant women suspected of being infected with SARS-COV2 was guided by obstetric assessment. Neonatal resuscitation was performed in a separate room adjacent to the delivery room. Mother and newborn were kept together in a designated isolation room.

Case-control description

From the cohort of 974 deliveries that occurred between May 14th and August 31st, 2020, we performed a nested case-control (NCC) study. Cases were the 133 SARS-COV-2 positive mothers. From the list of all deliveries, SARS-COV-2 positive mothers were randomly sampled to obtain four controls for each case. Matching was done on age. First, we describe the differences in outcomes between pregnant women with COVID-19 and those without COVID-19. Secondly, we describe neonatal outcomes between COVID-19 pregnant women with and without severe pneumonia.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using STATA 15.0 software (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Quantitative variables were statistically classified using the first and third quartiles and the median. We performed simple comparisons using Student’s t-test for quantitative variables and CHI2 or Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables. First, a bivariate analysis was performed to examine the covariates and their relationships with the outcome measures based on the crude odds ratio and its confidence interval. Next, covariates statistically associated with outcomes were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Results were expressed as means, odds ratios, and confidence intervals. We selected the following variables as confounders: birthplace, maternal age, parity and gravity and occupation. An initial analysis was performed to describe maternal outcomes. Then, we performed a separate analysis to assess neonatal outcomes. Pearson's goodness of fit test was used.

Newborn COVID-19 testing procedures

The diagnosis was confirmed by a positive SARS-COV2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test on the nasopharyngeal swab. Newborns, regardless of the presence or absence of COVID-19 symptoms, were tested if their mothers had biologically confirmed COVID-19. They underwent a single testing performed within the first 24 h after labor, then later in case of COVID-19 symptoms. The standard of care in our maternity ward is to initiate skin-to-skin contact with newborns within the first hour of life if the health of the mother and the newborn allow it, and to breastfeed newborns with mothers wearing surgical masks near their newborn and practicing good hand hygiene before contact with the skin. Breastfeeding is recommended if medically appropriate. All newborns who did not require hospitalization were kept in a cradle near their mothers. The data collected in this study were gathered from inpatient medical records at birth, health logs, and consultation records. Neonates from COVID-19-positive mothers were reviewed in consultation at 7 days, 14 days and then 1 month. These data included demographic data, maternal and neonatal clinical signs at childbirth, during hospitalization and during follow-up after discharge, microbiological results (PCR-SARS-CoV-2 test). Newborns were assessed while in hospital and at home for signs of COVID-19 such as fever, digestive disturbances, respiratory signs. The mothers were clinically evaluated at home by the private midwife.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Medical Ethical Committee of Cayenne Hospital. However, the requirement for written informed consent was waived by the ethics committee. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Cayenne General Hospital (number 1–2020-V2).

Patient and public involvement

In this study, patients were not directly involved in the research. We collected data from medical records as part of the care.

Results

During the study period, 974 women delivered at our center, of whom 133 (13.7%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 ( Fig. 1). Among the 35 pregnant women with symptoms of COVID-19 (26.3%), cough was the most common symptom, present in half of the cases. These women had few additional symptoms on admission. Among them, 3 developed fever as other symptoms during hospitalization and 4 have progressed to critical pneumonia requiring their transfer to intensive care unit. Among the neonates born from SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, the PCR testing for SARS-COV-2 was performed between 24 h and 20 days. Of them, 3 neonates tested positive.
Fig. 1

Study profile.

Study profile. Table 1 describes the characteristics of the study population. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic, clinical, and comorbidity parameters between infected and uninfected mothers. There were also no significant differences in severity, parity, and age at delivery (all p > 0.05). Table 2 describes the obstetrical outcomes. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal death in utero and newborn birth weight (all P > 0.05). In addition, the rate of eclampsia was low and comparable in both groups Table 2. Overall, we did not note an increased risk of prematurity, with the exception of women with severe forms of COVID-19. The two groups were also comparable with respect to meconium-stained amniotic fluid, neonatal asphyxia and respiratory distress (all P > 0.05). ( Table 3). Most infants were breastfed at birth, regardless of their mothers' COVID-19 status (p > 0.05). Among COVID-19-positive pregnant and/or postpartum women hospitalized in ICU ( Table 4), prevalence of preterm births (OR=12.5 [1.7–90.5], p = 0.01), fetal death in utero (OR=25.9 [2.2–305], p = 0.01) and admission in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (OR=13.4 [3.0–60], p = 0.001) appeared higher than the controls. No maternal deaths were recorded in the study. Table 5 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the 3 COVID-19 positive newborns.
Table 1

Maternal demographic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristics

Maternal SARS-COV-2
Maternal SARS-COV-2

RT-PCR Positive, n = 133RT-PCR Negative, p n = 504
Median age at delivery (years, IQR)29[24–35]27[24–33]0.8
Birth place0.8
France55 (41)205 (41)
Haiti45(34)169 (33)
Others33 (25)130 (26)
Occupation30 (23)141 (28)0.2
Clinical characteristics
Gravity, median (IRQ)3[2], [3], [4]3[2], [3], [4]0.4
Parity, median (IRQ)3[1], [2], [3], [4]2[1], [2], [3]0.1
Gestational age at admission (weeks), median (IQR)29[24–35]27[24–33]0.8
Comorbidities
Pregestational diabetes mellitus, n (%)1 (0.75)4 (0.79)0.9
Pregestational arterial hypertension, n (%)1 (0.75)6 (1.2)0.6
Pre‐pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n (%)4 (3)9 (1.8)0.3
Sickle cell disease, n (%)7 (5.3)32 (6.3)0.6
Gestational diabetes mellitus, n (%)19 (14.3)66 (13)0.7

IQR =interquartile range.

Table 2

Obstetric outcomes.

CharacteristicsMaternal SARS-COV-2Maternal SARS-COV-2p
RT-PCR Positive, n = 133RT-PCR Negative, n = 504
IUC admission, n (%)4 (3)17 (3,4)0.7
Live birth, n (%)130 (98)494 (98)0.8
Preterm birth< 37 weeks of gestation, n (%)15 (11)34 (7)0.08
Premature rupture of membranes5 (4)12 (2.4)0.4
Mode of delivery0.9
Vaginal delivery98 (74)377 (75)
Caesarean delivey34 (26)127 (25)
Intrapartum fever, n (%)3 (2.3)3 (0.6)0.09
Preeclampsy10 (7.5)37 (7.3)0.9
Postpartum haemorrhage, n (%)7 (5,3)26 (5,2)0.9
Abnormal fetal heart rate6 (4.5)32 (6.3)0.4
Fetal death in utero2 (1.5)5 (1.0)0.6
Intrauterine growth retardation14 (11)77 (15)0.1
Table 3

Neonatal outcomes according to SARS-COV-2 maternal status.

CharacteristicsMaternal SARS-COV-2Maternal SARS-COV-2p
RT-PCR Positive, n = 133RT-PCR Negative, n = 504
Birthweight, medain (IRQ)3150 [2770–3490]3090 [2700–3480]0.9
5 min Apgar score, median (IRQ)10[9], [10]10[10]0.4
Neonate sex, n (%)0.4
Male64 (48)263 (52)
Female69 (52)241 (48)
Location of neonatal admission, n (%)0.4
Well‐baby nursery
112 (84)434 (86)
Neonatal intensive care unit21 (16)70 (14)
Breastfeeding130 (98)594 (98)0.8
Positive neonatal SARS‐CoV‐2 RT‐PCR, n (%)3 (9%)*0 (0)

*out of 32 tested newborns

Table 4

Summary characteristics and outcome measures among the 4 women transferred in IUC.

PatientsPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4
General characteristics
Age at delivery (years)36373740
Gestational age at presentation (weeks)37372828
Stage of pregnancy
1st trimester
2nd trimesteryesyes
3rd trimesteryesyes
Symptomatic on presentationyesyesyesyes
Maternal investigations
CRP, mg/L61130120142
RT-PCR result positiveyesyesyesyes
Pneumonia found from CTyesyesyesyes
Maternal outcomes
Gestation at delivery, weeks38372828
Pre-term delivery*nonoyesyes
< 37 weeksnonoyesyes
< 32 weeksnonoyesyes
Days between symptom and delivery137316
Mode of delivery
Caesarean sectionnoyesyesyes
Vaginalyesnonono
Symptomatic post-deliverynoyesyesyes
Perinatal mortalitynoyesnono
Neonatal outcomes
Birthweight (gm)3000324013551080
Apgar 5 min10099
NICU admissionnoyesyesyes
Diagnosed with COVID-19 *nononono
Table 5

Demographic and clinical characteristics from the three positive newborns.

CharacteristicsPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3
Gestational age (weeks)383840
Mode of deliveryVaginalVaginalVaginal
APGAR at 5 min101010
Brith weght (g)337038753500
Birth length (cm)494951.5
Birth head circumference (cm)343635
Mode of breastfeedingBreastfeedingBreastfeedingBreastfeeding
Clinical manifestationsRhinopharyngitisEscherichia coli pyelonephritisIsolated fever
Fever 100,4°FFever 102,2°FFever 100,4°F
Length of clinical signs (days)332
Day of Positive RT-PCR (D)9208
How long RTPCR positive (days)Control RT-PCR not performedControl RT-PCR not performedControl RT-PCR not performed
Lenght of stay in hospital483
Maternal demographic and clinical characteristics. IQR =interquartile range. Obstetric outcomes. Neonatal outcomes according to SARS-COV-2 maternal status. *out of 32 tested newborns Summary characteristics and outcome measures among the 4 women transferred in IUC. Demographic and clinical characteristics from the three positive newborns.

Discussion

This study allowed longitudinal follow-up of neonates born to COVID-19-infected mothers, and analyzed the relationship between SARS-COV-2 exposure and perinatal outcomes related to infection. Our results show that SARS-COV-2 infection in pregnant women was mostly mild and had little impact on neonatal outcomes. Significantly, infants born to mothers with severe SARS-COV-2 pneumonia had a higher risk of preterm birth, fetal death in utero, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Indeed, pregnancy is characterized by many physiological, endocrine and immunological changes affecting all body systems [13]. These changes in estrogen and progesterone levels and immune function can increase the susceptibility of pregnant women to certain infections and serious complications. Moreover, pregnancy remains one of the most vulnerable periods in terms of morbidity and mortality, not only for the mother, but also for the fetus. In addition, these changes in hormone levels that begin in the first trimester of pregnancy lead to respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune changes that make pregnant women more susceptible to SARS-Cov-2 infection, in addition to an increased risk of developing SARS [14]. Only 3 infants have been tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, between 8 and 20 days of life. The most likely reason for the infection that developed in 3 babies in our study is that they later took the virus from their environment especially from mother or father. Although these 3 infants were asymptomatic, vigilance is required, as severe forms of neonatal COVID-19 have been described [4], [5]. Various mutations observed in the SARS-CoV-2 genome have caused great concern due to their rapid emergence [15]. Some of these variants have been associated with severe forms of COVID-19 in pregnant women, as well as in newborns [16]. Indeed, pregnant women should be considered a population at risk for severe COVID-19. For this reason, public health agencies around the world now recommend that pregnant women receive the COVID-19 vaccine to reduce the risk of this virus to the mother and fetus [17], [18], [19]. In our study, we found high rates of preterm birth only when the mother had severe SARS-COV2 pneumonia requiring transfer to ICU. The explanation for this risk is the elective cesarean section delivery, in order to end the pregnancy, and allow maternal salvage. Our results are consistent with those published previously [2], [3], [20], [21]. In contradiction with data showing an increase in preeclampsia even in cases of asymptomatic maternal infection [22], [23], [24], we did not observe an increase in preeclampsia in mothers infected with COVID-19. This difference in results could be explained by the small sample size of our study. Preeclampsia is independently associated with COVID-19 during pregnancy, particularly in nulliparous women [25]. The most likely explanation for the observed association is that preeclampsia is a vascular condition, preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection, which would increase the risk of COVID-19 in the same way as essential hypertension. On the contrary, more recent data consisting of a meta-analysis are more reassuring and report that the rates of maternal and neonatal mortality and vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2, as well as the rates of caesarean section for prematurity, are low [26]. Clearly, this meta-analysis is very interesting in that it highlights the limitations of previously published observational studies [2], [3], [20], [21]. These studies, like ours, showed a high rate of preterm birth in SARS-COV2-infected mothers. These conflicting results could be explained by the low power of these observational studies, the lack of multicenter studies and the insufficiency of good quality data. Large-scale studies are therefore greatly needed to clarify the risk factors associated with viral transmission and severe infections in newborns. In our practice, allowing newborns to live with their mother and be breastfed is part of routine care. This confirms that with appropriate precautions, despite breastfeeding, the risk of neonatal transmission of SARS-COV-2 is very low. Indeed, breast milk is the reference in infant feeding. The World Health Organization (WHO) insists on the importance of continuing breastfeeding during SARS-COV-2 outbreak [27]. Neonatologists must take an active role in the management of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, reporting data, but also participate in the development of official guidelines that will contribute to improved newborn care [28], [29]. Screening is recommended for all newborns born to mothers with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, regardless of whether the newborn has signs of infection. For newborns with signs of infection suggestive of COVID-19, neonatologists should also consider other differential diagnoses and initiate appropriate management. Given the magnitude of this epidemic, the health systems of countries around the world should make this newborn screening program fully operational [30]. Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size was very small and the follow-up period very short. Second, as serological tests were not available, no patient could benefit from them. However, due to the design of our study consisting of neonates, we lack information regarding placental pathology. In conclusion, our data suggest little neonatal morbidity associated with maternal COVID-19, except for those born to mothers admitted to intensive care unit. In addition, under breastfeeding conditions with rigorous hygiene precautions and parental education, the risk of SARS-COV-2 virus transmission from mother to newborn is unlikely. Based on our results, since vertical and perinatal infection is rare, breastfeeding does not increase the risk of COVID-19 and should be encouraged.

Funding

No funding to declare.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

N. Elenga and M.-J. Wandji conceived the study, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript; J. Siban, M. Nacher and M. Demar critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
  28 in total

1.  Probable congenital SARS-CoV-2 infection in a neonate born to a woman with active SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Maksim Kirtsman; Yenge Diambomba; Susan M Poutanen; Ann K Malinowski; Evangelia Vlachodimitropoulou; W Tony Parks; Laura Erdman; Shaun K Morris; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hubba Akhtar; Chandni Patel; Eyad Abuelgasim; Amer Harky
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Neonatal management and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observation cohort study.

Authors:  Christine M Salvatore; Jin-Young Han; Karen P Acker; Priyanka Tiwari; Jenny Jin; Michael Brandler; Carla Cangemi; Laurie Gordon; Aimee Parow; Jennifer DiPace; Patricia DeLaMora
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 4.  Epidemiology, genome, and clinical features of the pandemic SARS-CoV-2: a recent view.

Authors:  J M Abduljalil; B M Abduljalil
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  Management of the mother-infant dyad with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly epidemic context.

Authors:  C Pietrasanta; L Pugni; A Ronchi; F Schena; R Davanzo; G Gargantini; E Ferrazzi; F Mosca
Journal:  J Neonatal Perinatal Med       Date:  2020

Review 6.  Italian neonatologists and SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned to face coming new waves.

Authors:  Maria Elena Cavicchiolo; Daniele Trevisanuto; Elena Priante; Laura Moschino; Fabio Mosca; Eugenio Baraldi
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.953

7.  COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy: coverage and safety.

Authors:  Helena Blakeway; Smriti Prasad; Erkan Kalafat; Paul T Heath; Shamez N Ladhani; Kirsty Le Doare; Laura A Magee; Pat O'Brien; Arezou Rezvani; Peter von Dadelszen; Asma Khalil
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 10.693

8.  Preeclampsia and COVID-19: results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Aris T Papageorghiou; Philippe Deruelle; Robert B Gunier; Stephen Rauch; Perla K García-May; Mohak Mhatre; Mustapha Ado Usman; Sherief Abd-Elsalam; Saturday Etuk; Lavone E Simmons; Raffaele Napolitano; Sonia Deantoni; Becky Liu; Federico Prefumo; Valeria Savasi; Marynéa Silva do Vale; Eric Baafi; Ghulam Zainab; Ricardo Nieto; Nerea Maiz; Muhammad Baffah Aminu; Jorge Arturo Cardona-Perez; Rachel Craik; Adele Winsey; Gabriela Tavchioska; Babagana Bako; Daniel Oros; Albertina Rego; Anne Caroline Benski; Fatimah Hassan-Hanga; Mónica Savorani; Francesca Giuliani; Loïc Sentilhes; Milagros Risso; Ken Takahashi; Carmen Vecchiarelli; Satoru Ikenoue; Ramachandran Thiruvengadam; Constanza P Soto Conti; Enrico Ferrazzi; Irene Cetin; Vincent Bizor Nachinab; Ernawati Ernawati; Eduardo A Duro; Alexey Kholin; Michelle L Firlit; Sarah Rae Easter; Joanna Sichitiu; Abimbola Bowale; Roberto Casale; Rosa Maria Cerbo; Paolo Ivo Cavoretto; Brenda Eskenazi; Jim G Thornton; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Stephen H Kennedy; José Villar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Allotey; Elena Stallings; Mercedes Bonet; Magnus Yap; Shaunak Chatterjee; Tania Kew; Luke Debenham; Anna Clavé Llavall; Anushka Dixit; Dengyi Zhou; Rishab Balaji; Siang Ing Lee; Xiu Qiu; Mingyang Yuan; Dyuti Coomar; Jameela Sheikh; Heidi Lawson; Kehkashan Ansari; Madelon van Wely; Elizabeth van Leeuwen; Elena Kostova; Heinke Kunst; Asma Khalil; Simon Tiberi; Vanessa Brizuela; Nathalie Broutet; Edna Kara; Caron Rahn Kim; Anna Thorson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Lynne Mofenson; Javier Zamora; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.