Literature DB >> 32479682

Pre-eclampsia-like syndrome induced by severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study.

M Mendoza1, I Garcia-Ruiz1, N Maiz1, C Rodo1, P Garcia-Manau1, B Serrano1, R M Lopez-Martinez2, J Balcells3, N Fernandez-Hidalgo4,5, E Carreras1, A Suy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of clinical, ultrasonographic and biochemical findings related to pre-eclampsia (PE) in pregnancies with COVID-19, and to assess their accuracy to differentiate between PE and the PE-like features associated with COVID-19.
DESIGN: A prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Singleton pregnancies with COVID-19 at >20+0  weeks.
METHODS: Forty-two consecutive pregnancies were recruited and classified into two groups: severe and non-severe COVID-19, according to the occurrence of severe pneumonia. Uterine artery pulsatility index (UtAPI) and angiogenic factors (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor [sFlt-1/PlGF]) were assessed in women with suspected PE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of signs and symptoms related to PE, such as hypertension, proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, abnormal UtAPI and increased sFlt-1/PlGF.
RESULTS: Thirty-four cases were classified as non-severe and 8 as severe COVID-19. Five (11.9%) women presented signs and symptoms of PE, all five being among the severe COVID-19 cases (62.5%). However, abnormal sFlt-1/PlGF and UtAPI could only be demonstrated in one case. One case remained pregnant after recovery from severe pneumonia and had a spontaneous resolution of the PE-like syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with severe COVID-19 can develop a PE-like syndrome that might be distinguished from actual PE by sFlt-1/PlGF, LDH and UtAPI assessment. Healthcare providers should be aware of its existence and monitor pregnancies with suspected pre-eclampsia with caution. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This study shows that a pre-eclampsia-like syndrome could be present in some pregnancies with severe COVID-19.
© 2020 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenic factors; COVID-19; PlGF; SARS; SARS-CoV-2; pre-eclampsia; pre-eclampsia-like syndrome; pregnancy; sFlt-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479682      PMCID: PMC7300912          DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   7.331


Introduction

On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) outbreak a pandemic disease, given its increasing number of cases worldwide. Studies have shown that the disease caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, named as COVID‐19 (coronavirus disease 2019) typically presents with fever, dry cough and fatigue; nevertheless, up to 14% of the cases can evolve to severe pneumonia and 5% to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), both requiring admission to intensive care for intensive respiratory support. Whereas COVID‐19 is primarily a respiratory infection, it has important systemic effects including hypertension, kidney disease, thrombocytopenia and liver injury. , , , As SARS‐CoV‐2 is believed to invade the host through the cell entry receptor angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), these signs and symptoms in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are thought to be due to the vasoconstriction resulting from the dysfunction of the renin‐angiotensin system. , By contrast, clinical features of pre‐eclampsia (PE) are mainly a consequence of the endothelial damage originated by placental oxidative stress and antiangiogenic status, which leads to the appearance of hypertension and proteinuria, elevated liver enzymes, renal failure or thrombocytopenia, among others. , An increased incidence of PE has been reported among mothers infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 compared with the general population. Misdiagnosis, however, might have occurred in some of these cases, as COVID‐19 and PE have overlapping clinical features. Therefore, differential diagnosis might be challenging in COVID‐19 pregnant women presenting with hypertension and proteinuria, thrombocytopenia or elevated liver enzymes. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of clinical, ultrasonographic and biochemical findings related to PE in women with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and to assess their accuracy in differentiating between actual PE and PE‐like features associated with COVID‐19.

Methods

We carried out a prospective cohort study of all consecutive pregnant women at >20 weeks of gestation who presented to the emergency department of our tertiary care center for suspicion of COVID‐19 (dry cough and fever) and had laboratory‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, between 13 March and 10 April 2020. Patients were not actively involved in the research. Patients were classified in two groups: severe and non‐severe COVID‐19, according to the occurrence of severe pneumonia. The laboratory and clinical data were prospectively recorded in a database. The recorded data included the following: platelet count (per microlitre), D‐dimer (microg/l), lactate dehydrogenase (U/l), aspartate aminotransferase (U/l), alanine amninotransferase (U/l), urine protein to creatinine ratio (mg/g), systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean arterial pressure (mmHg), creatinine (mg/dl) and gestational age (GA) in weeks. GA to describe particular cases was expressed in weeks+days. Mean arterial pressure was calculated as: 1/3 × (systolic blood pressure) + 2/3 × (diastolic blood pressure). Maternal baseline characteristics were compared between groups. In severe cases, data were analysed at three different time points during COVID‐19: before, during and after intensive care unit (ICU) admission for severe pneumonia. According to the WHO guidance, laboratory confirmation for SARS‐CoV‐2 was defined as a positive result of real‐time reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) assay of nasal and pharyngeal swabs. PE was defined as new onset of high blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) or worsening of previous high blood pressure in addition to new‐onset proteinuria (protein to creatinine ratio >300) or worsening of previous proteinuria, or to at least one of the following signs and symptoms of severe PE: cerebral or visual symptoms, elevation of liver enzymes to twice normal concentration, platelet count <100 000/µl, serum creatinine concentrations >1.1 mg/dl or pulmonary oedema. The HELLP syndrome is frequently considered a variant of PE. Diagnostic criteria for HELLP syndrome are haemolysis with increased LDH (>600 U/l) and AST (≥70 U/l), and platelets <100 000/µl. In women with new‐onset hypertension, the uterine artery pulsatility index (UtAPI) was assessed by transabdominal Doppler ultrasound and maternal serum levels of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) in pg/ml were determined by means of the fully automated Elecsys assays for sFlt‐1 and PlGF on an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay platform (cobas e analyzers; Roche® Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). , The sFlt‐1/PlGF was then calculated. UtAPI above the 95th centile for gestational age, and sFlt‐1/PlGF values ≥85 (at <34 weeks) or ≥110 (at ≥34 weeks) were considered highly suggestive of underlying placental disease. , , ,

Statistical analysis

The open‐source satistical software R Commander(R package version 2.3‐1), which is freely available on CRAN (https://cran.r‐project.org), was used for statistical analysis. Categorical data were reported as frequency and percentage, and comparisons between severity groups were estimated by Chi‐square or Fisher tests, as appropriate. Continuous variables were described as median and interquartile (IQR) range and Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess differences between severity groups. The statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

During the study period (31 days), 42 cases of SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected women were identified at a median GA of 32.0 (IQR 26.0–37.5) weeks of gestation. Among them, eight (19.0%) cases developed severe pneumonia and required admission to the ICU. Median maternal age of cases with severe COVID‐19 was significantly greater than in the non‐severe cases (39.4 [34.2–44.5] versus 30.9 [25.0–41.8], P = 0.006). No other pregnancy baseline characteristics differed between severity groups. Among the eight severe cases, five (62.5%) developed PE features (new‐onset hypertension and proteinuria and/or thrombocytopenia and/or elevated liver enzymes), requiring antihypertensive drugs in all of them. No cases with diagnostic criteria for PE were found among the 34 non‐severe COVID‐19 women (Table 1).
Table 1

Maternal characteristics in pregnant women with COVID‐19

All patients (n = 42)Nonsevere patients (n = 34)Severe patients (n = 8) P
Maternal age (years) 32.0 (26.0–37.5)30.9 (25.0–41.8)39.4 (34.2–44.5)0.006
Pre‐pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 26.2 (23.5–29.3)26.1 (22.8–29.3)27.9 (25.4–30.6)0.378
Gestational age (weeks) 31.6 (25.9–36.1)32.8 (26.7–36.1)28.6 (22.3–32.4)0.211
Ethnicity
White22 (52.4%)19 (55.9%)3 (37.5%)0.304
Latin American17 (40.5%)12 (35.3%)5 (62.5%)
Others3 (7.1%)3 (8.8%)0
ART 4 (9.5%)2 (5.9%)2 (25.0%)0.158
Smoking 2 (4.8%)1 (2.9%)1 (12.5%)0.348
Nuliparous 20 (47.6%)16 (47.1%)4 (50.0%)1.0
History of PE 0001.0
Pre‐pregnancy HTN 0001.0
Pre‐pregnancy diabetes 1 (2.4%)1 (2.4%)01.0
Chronic kidney disease 0001.0
PE diagnostic criteria during COVID‐19 5 (11.9%)05 (62.5%)<0.001

ART, assisted reproductive technology; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; PE, pre‐eclampsia.

Continuous data are given as median and interquartile range. Categorical data as frequency and percentage. P‐values denoted the comparison between non‐severe and severe subgroups.

Maternal characteristics in pregnant women with COVID‐19 ART, assisted reproductive technology; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; PE, pre‐eclampsia. Continuous data are given as median and interquartile range. Categorical data as frequency and percentage. P‐values denoted the comparison between non‐severe and severe subgroups.

Evolution of clinical and laboratory findings in the severe cases of COVID‐19

Before severe pneumonia, all eight women were normotensive, had normal platelet count, liver enzymes, LDH and proteinuria, and only one case with UtAPI above the 95th centile was identified. During severe pneumonia, the most frequent findings were: elevated liver enzymes to twice normal concentrations (87.5%), proteinuria >300 mg/g (75.0%) and hypertension (62.5%) (Figure 1). No cases with creatinine >1.1 mg/dl or platelet count <100 000/µl were found; nevertheless, one case presented mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 000/µl). sFlt‐1/PlGF ≥85/110 and UtAPI >95th centile were present in only one woman. Only one case with LDH >600 IU/l was identified. Based on these findings, five women (62.5%) had diagnostic criteria of PE and/or HELLP syndrome. Caesarean delivery was performed during ICU stay in four cases. HELLP syndrome was the indication for delivery in case 1 (at a GA of 30+1) and worsening of SARS in cases 3, 4 and 7 (at a GA of 37+6, 36+6 and 28+3, respectively). After recovery from severe pneumonia, hypertensive therapy was no longer required in all cases and only the woman who had presented with sFlt‐1/PlGF >110, LDH >600 and UtAPI above the 95th centile, still met PE diagnostic criteria (more details on clinical and laboratory findings and their evolution in severe cases can be seen in Table 2 and Figure 1).
Figure 1

Evolution of ALT, AST, proteinuria and mean arterial blood pressure in pregnant women with COVID‐19 before (A), during (B) and after (C) severe pneumonia. The bottom and top edges of each box represent the first and third quartiles, respectively, the band within the box represents the median value and the whiskers represent values that are 1.5 times the interquartile range. Median values and interquartile range of each variable are displayed.

Table 2

Clinical and biochemical pre‐eclampsia‐related findings in pregnant women with COVID‐19 before, during and after severe pneumonia

VariablesCase 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5Case 6Case 7Case 8
Before severe pneumoniaGA (weeks)30+0 22+6 37+5 36+4 32+0 20+3 27+4 20+1
SBP (mmHg)130120123117104135107116
DBP (mmHg)7472746771766763
MAP (mmHg)92.788.090.383.782.095.780.380.7
Prot/creat (mg/g)37180
AST (U/l)1719152026192314
ALT (U/l)1630132620121422
Platelets/µl158 000242 000402 000210 000275 000234 000319 000242 000
LDH (U/l)
D‐dimer (mg/ml)
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.630.490.790.740.360.450.66
UtAPI >95th centileNoNoYesNoNoNoNoNo
PE/HELLP diagnostic criteriaNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
During severe pneumoniaGA (weeks)30+1 24+4 37+6 36+5 32+1 20+4 28+3 20+2
SBP (mmHg)145168156155116115140108
DBP (mmHg)9011698108706810569
MAP (mmHg)108.3133.3117.3123.785.383.7116.782.0
Prot/creat (mg/g)85562237851439649948130
AST (U/l)153122104623852138113
ALT (U/l)1701365239381465230
Platelets/µl324 000160 000279 000231 000336 000243 000108 000505 000
LDH (U/l)482370672555517176463312
D‐dimer (mg/ml)457212950651800326119514376
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.340.420.850.880.420.200.390.26
HidralazineYesYesYesYesNoNoNoNo
LabetalolYesYesYesYesNoNoYesNo
sFlt‐1/PlGF9.4020.24378.9049.3624.784.607.605.19
UtAPI >95th centileNoNoYesNoNoNoNoNo
PE/HELLP diagnostic criteriaYesYesYesYesNoNoYesNo
After severe pneumoniaGA at delivery (weeks)30+1 Not delivered37+6 36+6 Not deliveredNot delivered28+3 Not delivered
Reason for deliveryHELLPSARSSARSSARS
GA (weeks)25.533.221.521.3
SBP (mmHg)123132142115116108109110
DBP (mmHg)8375936879627564
MAP (mmHg)96.394.0109.383.791.377.386.379.3
Prot/creat (mg/g)2101834268311583189128
AST (U/l)39325643582361
ALT (U/l)4513241295529172
Platelets/µl312 000218 000232 000258 000292 000169 000364 000762 000
LDH (U/l)222277692325211353192
D‐dimer (mg/ml)61717453258454347470
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.250.30.580.410.420.65
UtAPI >95th centileNoNoNoNo
PE/HELLP diagnostic criteriaNoNoYesNoNoNoNoNo

ALT, alanine amninotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GA, gestational age; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PE, pre‐eclampsia; PlGF, placental growth factor; prot/creat; urine protein to creatinine ratio; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; sFlt‐1, soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1; UtAPI, uterine artery pulsatility index.

Evolution of ALT, AST, proteinuria and mean arterial blood pressure in pregnant women with COVID‐19 before (A), during (B) and after (C) severe pneumonia. The bottom and top edges of each box represent the first and third quartiles, respectively, the band within the box represents the median value and the whiskers represent values that are 1.5 times the interquartile range. Median values and interquartile range of each variable are displayed. Clinical and biochemical pre‐eclampsia‐related findings in pregnant women with COVID‐19 before, during and after severe pneumonia ALT, alanine amninotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GA, gestational age; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PE, pre‐eclampsia; PlGF, placental growth factor; prot/creat; urine protein to creatinine ratio; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; sFlt‐1, soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1; UtAPI, uterine artery pulsatility index.

Discussion

Main findings

This study shows that 11.9% of COVID‐19 pregnant women develop PE features; however, they only appeared in COVID‐19 cases complicated by severe pneumonia. In this situation, PE/HELLP diagnostic criteria were found in five (62.5%) of the cases; nevertheless, abnormal angiogenic status, increased LDH and placental underperfusion could only be confirmed in one of them, which indicates that this case was probably an actual PE. These findings suggest that the signs and symptoms compatible with PE/HELLP present in four of these five cases, could be derived from the complex polypharmacy administrated or from the renal and cardiovascular dysfunction for severe SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. In our cohort, only one of these five cases remained pregnant after severe pneumonia recovery, and then all PE/HELLP features recovered spontaneously. PE and HELLP syndrome do not resolve spontaneously and delivery is the only definitive cure. For these reasons, we believe that the four women with PE/HELLP signs and symptoms, and normal sFlt‐1/PlGF, UtAPI and LDH <600, had developed a PE‐like syndrome.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the incidence of signs and symptoms of PE in a relatively large cohort of pregnancies with COVID‐19 and to show that a PE‐like syndrome could be induced by severe COVID‐19. Furthermore, our findings are of great value to improve maternal care of pregnancies with severe pneumonia due to COVID‐19. This study has several limitations. First, this is a small series and the results should be considered with caution. Further research is needed to better understand the systemic consequences of COVID‐19 in pregnant women. Second, only four women with PE‐like syndrome are reported, which could mean that our findings are not applicable to all pregnancies with severe pneumonia due to COVID‐19. Third, only one of the four women who developed a PE‐like syndrome remained pregnant after severe pneumonia and despite the PE‐like syndrome recovering spontaneously, we cannot affirm that the three other cases did not improve due to delivery. Nevertheless, we believe that the PE‐like syndrome alone may not be an obstetric indication for delivery, as it seems that it might not be a placental complication itself, but one of the clinical manifestations of severe COVID‐19. Finally, although UtAPI and sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio have a high negative predictive value to predict the short‐term absence of PE, they are not diagnostic criteria of PE; , thus, we cannot categorically state that the case with PE features and elevated UtAPI and sFlt‐1/PlGF was an actual PE and not a PE‐like syndrome.

Interpretation

Several disorders have previously proved to imitate PE because they share some of the clinical and laboratory findings of patients with PE. The pathophysiologic causes of these conditions include vasospasm, platelet activation or destruction, microvascular thrombosis, endothelial cell dysfunction and reduced tissue perfusion. Some of these disorders include gestational hypertension, chronic kidney disease, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, haemolytic uremic syndrome, acute exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus, severe hypothyroidism and sepsis. , , Differential diagnosis may be a challenge to caregivers due to the overlap of diagnostic criteria among them. Additionally, some of them are potentially life‐threatening for both the mother and the fetus; thus, accurate diagnosis is important, as the management and prognosis of these conditions differ widely. Recent studies have shown that angiogenic factors support the differential diagnosis between PE and some of its imitators. , , PlGF and sFlt‐1 are placenta‐related angiogenic factors that are highly specific to placental insufficiency. In PE, the placenta fails properly to invade and remodel maternal uterine spiral arteries, leading to impaired perfusion and placental oxidative stress. , This condition leads to increased UtAPI and to an antiangiogenic status with increased s‐Flt‐1/PlGF ratio due to up‐regulation of sFlt‐1 and down‐regulation of PlGF. , The identification of an sFlt‐1/PlGF imbalance is detectable in the maternal circulation at least 5 weeks before the onset of clinical PE. Thus, COVID‐19 patients with normal early phase of placental implantation should have normal values of sFlt‐1/PlGF and UtAPI in spite of proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzymes or hypertension. This hypothesis, however, had not been previously investigated due to the very recent outbreak of the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This study has important clinical implications, as we show that sFlt‐1/PlGF, UtAPI and LDH allow PE to be differentiated from the PE‐like syndrome present in some of the pregnant women with severe COVID‐19. This knowledge could improve management and reduce misdiagnosis in pregnancies with severe COVID‐19. In our cohort, case 1 was probably misdiagnosed as HELLP syndrome; this, in addition to the concurrence of SARS, influenced the indication of delivery. The fact that the sFlt‐1/PlGF results were not available at the time of worsening of the maternal condition, and the scarce evidence available at that time of the consequences of COVID‐19 during pregnancy, prompted the delivery indication at 30+1 weeks. After the experience with this first case, a more conservative management was adopted in the following cases that developed PE‐like syndrome. Fortunately, they completely recovered after severe pneumonia and became normotensive again without any antihypertensive drugs and without being delivered.

Conclusion

Pregnant women with severe COVID‐19 could develop a PE‐like syndrome, which might be distinguished from actual PE by sFlt‐1/PlGF, LDH and UtAPI assessment. Therefore, healthcare providers should be aware of its existence and monitor pregnancies with suspected PE with caution. PE‐like syndrome might not be an indication for earlier delivery in itself, as it might not be a placental complication and could resolve spontaneously after recovery from severe pneumonia.

Disclosure of interests

Manel Mendoza and Itziar Garcia‐Ruiz received lecture fees by Roche Diagnostics. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Completed disclosure of interests forms is available to view online as supporting information.

Contribution to authorship

AS and EC had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. EC, AS, MM and IG‐R conceived and designed the study. RML‐M, JB, NM and NF‐H contributed to the literature research. NM, CR, PG‐M and BS contributed to data collection and confirmation. MM, IG‐R and AS contributed to data analysis, and MM, IG‐R, AS, RMLM, JB, NF‐H and EC contributed to data interpretation. MM and IG‐R were in charge of writing the manuscript draft. AS and EC made substantial revisions to the manuscript. MM and IG‐R contributed equally to this article. AS and EC also contributed equally to this article.

Details of ethics approval

This study was approved by the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Ethics Committee (PR[AMI]181/2020) on 13 March 2020. Written informed consent was waived due to the rapid emergence of this infectous disease. However, verbal informed consent was obtained from all patients, which was included in the patient's medical record.

Funding

None. Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  A M Martin; R Bindra; P Curcio; S Cicero; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Multicenter evaluation of the first automated Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays in normal pregnancies and preeclampsia.

Authors:  J Schiettecatte; H Russcher; E Anckaert; M Mees; B Leeser; A S Tirelli; G M Fiedler; H Luthe; B Denk; J Smitz
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  O Gómez; F Figueras; S Fernández; M Bennasar; J M Martínez; B Puerto; E Gratacós
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 5.  Imitators of severe pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Baha M Sibai
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Severe hypothyroidism causing pre-eclampsia-like syndrome.

Authors:  Annalisa Inversetti; Audrey Serafini; Marco F Manzoni; Anna Dolcetta Capuzzo; Luca Valsecchi; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-29

Review 7.  Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Di Mascio; Asma Khalil; Gabriele Saccone; Giuseppe Rizzo; Danilo Buca; Marco Liberati; Jacopo Vecchiet; Luigi Nappi; Giovanni Scambia; Vincenzo Berghella; Francesco D'Antonio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-03-25

8.  Association between adverse pregnancy outcome and imbalance in angiogenic regulators and oxidative stress biomarkers in gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.

Authors:  Cornelius A Turpin; Samuel A Sakyi; William K B A Owiredu; Richard K D Ephraim; Enoch O Anto
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Mario Plebani; Brandon Michael Henry
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Preeclampsia and eclampsia: the conceptual evolution of a syndrome.

Authors:  Offer Erez; Roberto Romero; Eunjung Jung; Piya Chaemsaithong; Mariachiara Bosco; Manaphat Suksai; Dahiana M Gallo; Francesca Gotsch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  The etiology of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Eunjung Jung; Roberto Romero; Lami Yeo; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Piya Chaemsaithong; Adithep Jaovisidha; Francesca Gotsch; Offer Erez
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in parturients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection during labor and delivery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rita Zlatkin; Sarah Dollinger; Chen Jacoby; Anat Shmueli; Shiri Barbash-Hazan; Rony Chen; Arnon Wiznitzer; Eran Hadar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  COVID-19 and Pregnancy: A narrative review of maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Nihal Al Riyami; Shahila Sheik
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 5.  COVID-19 and pregnancy: A scoping review on pregnancy characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Karoline Faria de Oliveira; Jacqueline Faria de Oliveira; Monika Wernet; Marina Carvalho Paschoini; Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Pregnancy Outcomes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Spanish Obstetric Emergency Group Study.

Authors:  Sara Cruz Melguizo; María Luisa de la Cruz Conty; Paola Carmona Payán; Alejandra Abascal-Saiz; Pilar Pintando Recarte; Laura González Rodríguez; Celia Cuenca Marín; Alicia Martínez Varea; Ana Belén Oreja Cuesta; Pilar Prats Rodríguez; Irene Fernández Buhigas; María Victoria Rodríguez Gallego; Ana María Fernández Alonso; Rocío López Pérez; José Román Broullón Molanes; María Begoña Encinas Pardilla; Mercedes Ramírez Gómez; María Joaquina Gimeno Gimeno; Antonio Sánchez Muñoz; Oscar Martínez-Pérez
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Placental lesions and SARS-Cov-2 infection: Diffuse placenta damage associated to poor fetal outcome.

Authors:  Amine Bouachba; Fabienne Allias; Beatrice Nadaud; Jerome Massardier; Yahia Mekki; Maude Bouscambert Duchamp; Benoit De LA Fourniere; Cyril Huissoud; Alexis Trecourt; Sophie Collardeau-Frachon
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Preeclampsia and COVID-19: results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Aris T Papageorghiou; Philippe Deruelle; Robert B Gunier; Stephen Rauch; Perla K García-May; Mohak Mhatre; Mustapha Ado Usman; Sherief Abd-Elsalam; Saturday Etuk; Lavone E Simmons; Raffaele Napolitano; Sonia Deantoni; Becky Liu; Federico Prefumo; Valeria Savasi; Marynéa Silva do Vale; Eric Baafi; Ghulam Zainab; Ricardo Nieto; Nerea Maiz; Muhammad Baffah Aminu; Jorge Arturo Cardona-Perez; Rachel Craik; Adele Winsey; Gabriela Tavchioska; Babagana Bako; Daniel Oros; Albertina Rego; Anne Caroline Benski; Fatimah Hassan-Hanga; Mónica Savorani; Francesca Giuliani; Loïc Sentilhes; Milagros Risso; Ken Takahashi; Carmen Vecchiarelli; Satoru Ikenoue; Ramachandran Thiruvengadam; Constanza P Soto Conti; Enrico Ferrazzi; Irene Cetin; Vincent Bizor Nachinab; Ernawati Ernawati; Eduardo A Duro; Alexey Kholin; Michelle L Firlit; Sarah Rae Easter; Joanna Sichitiu; Abimbola Bowale; Roberto Casale; Rosa Maria Cerbo; Paolo Ivo Cavoretto; Brenda Eskenazi; Jim G Thornton; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Stephen H Kennedy; José Villar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of data on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19: Clinical presentation, and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes based on COVID-19 severity.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Ali Ana; Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Zahra A Padhani; Omer Irfan; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 10.  COVID-19 is a systemic vascular hemopathy: insight for mechanistic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  David M Smadja; Steven J Mentzer; Michaela Fontenay; Mike A Laffan; Maximilian Ackermann; Julie Helms; Danny Jonigk; Richard Chocron; Gerald B Pier; Nicolas Gendron; Stephanie Pons; Jean-Luc Diehl; Coert Margadant; Coralie Guerin; Elisabeth J M Huijbers; Aurélien Philippe; Nicolas Chapuis; Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Christian Karagiannidis; Olivier Sanchez; Philipp Kümpers; David Skurnik; Anna M Randi; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 9.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.