| Literature DB >> 35713832 |
Mohammad Reza Sheikhattar1, Navid Nezafati2, Sajjad Shokouhyar1.
Abstract
Numerous studies have been conducted to identify the effects of natural crises on supply chain performance. Conventional analysis methods are based on either manual filter methods or data-driven methods. The manual filter methods suffer from validation problems due to sampling limitations, and data-driven methods suffer from the nature of crisis data which are vague and complex. This study aims to present an intelligent analysis model to automatically identify the effects of natural crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic on the supply chain through metadata generated on social media. This paper presents a thematic analysis framework to extract knowledge under user steering. This framework uses a text-mining approach, including co-occurrence term analysis and knowledge map construction. As a case study to approve our proposed model, we retrieved, cleaned, and analyzed 1024 online textual reports on supply chain crises published during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019-2021. We conducted a thematic analysis of the collected data and achieved a knowledge map on the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the supply chain. The resultant knowledge map consists of five main areas (and related sub-areas), including (1) food retail, (2) food services, (3) manufacturing, (4) consumers, and (5) logistics. We checked and validated the analytical results with some field experts. This experiment achieved 53 crisis knowledge propositions classified from 25,272 sentences with 631,799 terms and 31,864 unique terms using just three user-system interaction steps, which shows the model's high performance. The results lead us to conclude that the proposed model could be used effectively and efficiently as a decision support system, especially for crises in the supply chain analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Pandemic crisis; Supply chain crisis management; Supply chain risk monitoring; Text-mining; Thematic analysis model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35713832 PMCID: PMC9204682 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21380-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
Fig. 1LDA model
Fig. 2The proposed framework
Fig. 3Pseudo-code for the Pre-processing
Fig. 4Pseudo-code for the knowledge discovery layer
Fig. 5Relationship between context terms and key term
The required values for calculating the φ parameter of words X and Y in a set of documents
| # documents containing term | # documents does not contain term | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| # documents containing term | |||
| # documents does not contain term X | |||
| Total |
Fig. 6Query modification operation
Fig. 7The diagram of KU similarity with query
Top 30 terms in SC crisis corpus
| Ranking | Term | Frequency | Ranking | Terms | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Risk | 1155 | 16 | Countries | 1652 |
| 2 | Supply chain | 10,986 | 17 | Market | 1546 |
| 3 | Management | 5553 | 18 | Company | 1493 |
| 4 | Crisis | 3465 | 19 | Industry | 1377 |
| 5 | Pandemic | 3015 | 20 | Demand | 1252 |
| 6 | Companies | 2525 | 21 | Products | 1186 |
| 7 | COVID | 2361 | 22 | Production | 1105 |
| 8 | Business | 2167 | 23 | Resilience | 1096 |
| 9 | Blockchain | 2055 | 24 | Logistics | 1076 |
| 10 | Food | 2011 | 25 | Market | 1054 |
| 11 | Technology | 2005 | 26 | Security | 1046 |
| 12 | Product | 1971 | 27 | System | 1035 |
| 13 | Disruptions | 1823 | 28 | Suppliers | 1027 |
| 14 | Service | 1765 | 29 | Customers | 1021 |
| 15 | Impact | 1701 | 30 | Trade | 1012 |
Fig. 8LDA_Cluster visualization
Matrix of co-occurrence terms of key terms
| Key terms | Context terms | Key terms | Context terms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food retail | Stores | 1028 | 0.8740023 | Food service | Industry | 1258 | 0.7256924 |
| Worker | 985 | 0.8880104 | Government | 1012 | 0.8062149 | ||
| Grocery | 973 | 0.8763271 | Consumers | 856 | 0.6725691 | ||
| Foodstuffs | 902 | 0.7659201 | Sector | 823 | 0.7832588 | ||
| Online | 753 | 0.8841263 | Workers | 789 | 0.2362459 | ||
| Service | 530 | 0.7506144 | Restaurant | 706 | 0.4936511 | ||
| Covid | 423 | 0.3056318 | Products | 526 | 0.5265426 | ||
| Sector | 320 | 0.8740073 | Demand | 302 | 0.3826559 | ||
| Employees | 250 | 0.5756321 | Security | 264 | 0.7269556 | ||
| Shopping | 205 | 0.2036214 | Delivery | 212 | 0.0936559 | ||
| E-commerce | 105 | 0.1025964 | |||||
| Income | 98 | 0.6584220 | |||||
| Packaging | 87 | 0.1795882 | |||||
| Consumer | Shopping | 925 | 0.7856954 | Manufacturing | Adapt | 865 | 0.5652965 |
| Users | 856 | 0.4852115 | Sector | 725 | 0.2265995 | ||
| Law | 802 | 0.69523485 | Product | 702 | 0.0236955 | ||
| Spending | 725 | 0.3958442 | Covid | 602 | 0.1958521 | ||
| Behavior | 652 | 0.7954215 | |||||
| Respondent | 562 | 0.2953215 | Industry | 406 | 0.2695225 | ||
| Enforcement | 423 | 0.1695584 | Demand | 369 | 0.1236955 | ||
| Food | 365 | 0.2954225 | Automation | 302 | 0.6958848 | ||
| Growth | 256 | 0.3695584 | |||||
| Eating | 258 | 0.5366549 | Impact | 203 | 0.2998455 | ||
| Drinking | 203 | 0.6569542 | Operation | 123 | 0.7514523 | ||
| Crisis | 195 | 0.1658447 | Companies | 120 | 0.8541236 | ||
| Technology | 82 | 0.6592215 | |||||
| Logistic | Market | 852 | 0.2369584 | ||||
| Costs | 802 | 0.5265842 | |||||
| Law | 725 | 0.6589445 | |||||
| Disruption | 695 | 0.2569472 | |||||
| Transport | 510 | 0.3369525 | |||||
| Management | 453 | 0.3654258 | |||||
| Processing | 326 | 0.2568445 | |||||
| Impact | 237 | 0.6958444 | |||||
| Covid | 126 | 0.2569577 | |||||
| Firms | 103 | 0.2569542 | |||||
| Recovery | 92 | 0.3256521 | |||||
Fig. 9Crisis terms knowledge map
Term analogy based on adding concepts
| Initial query | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food retail + online | Analogy term | Business | COVID | Shopping | Frequency | Performer | Company | |||
| Analogy rate | 0.419 | 0.413 | 0.400 | 0.391 | 0.388 | 0.385 | 0.374 | 0.371 | 0. 355 | |
| Food retail + worker | Analogy term | Consumer | COVID | Business | Social | Time | ||||
| Analogy rate | 0.479 | 0.442 | 0.421 | 0.420 | 0.408 | 0.401 | 0.393 | 0.374 | 0.369 | |
| Food service + sector | Analogy term | Impact | Pandemic | Covid | Shopping | Delivery | Level | |||
| Analogy rate | 0.426 | 0.402 | 0.366 | 0.356 | 0.345 | 0.332 | 0.326 | 0.301 | 0.255 | |
| Consumer + behavior | Analogy term | Source | Error | Enforcement | Industry | Supplier | Supply | |||
| Analogy rate | 0.478 | 0.463 | 0.456 | 0.445 | 0.436 | 0.423 | 0.422 | 0.415 | 0.396 | |
Term analogy based on remove concepts
| Initial query | New query | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic-management | Analogy term | Impact | Frequency | Congestion | Company | |||||
| Analogy rat | 0.461 | 0.458 | 0.401 | 0.365 | 0.386 | 0.385 | 0.379 | 0.371 | 0.356 | |
Fig. 10Two-dimensional display of “food retail + online” query vector neighboring to “channel; impact; consumer; business; COVID” terms vector
Fig. 11Evaluated knowledge units outputs