| Literature DB >> 33215282 |
Mohsen Ahmadi1, Abbas Sharifi2, Sarv Khalili3.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the contagious diseases involving all the world in 2019-2020. Also, all people are concerned about the future of this catastrophe and how the continuous outbreak can be prevented. Some countries are not successful in controlling the outbreak; therefore, the incidence is observed in several peaks. In this paper, firstly single-peak SIR models are used for historical data. Regarding the SIR model, the termination time of the outbreak should have been in early June 2020. However, several peaks invalidate the results of single-peak models. Therefore, we should present a model to support pandemics with several extrema. In this paper, we presented the generalized logistic growth model (GLM) to estimate sub-epidemic waves of the COVID-19 outbreak in Iran. Therefore, the presented model simulated scenarios of two, three, and four waves in the observed incidence. In the second part of the paper, we assessed travel-related risk in inter-provincial travels in Iran. Moreover, the results of travel-related risk show that typical travel between Tehran and other sites exposed Isfahan, Gilan, Mazandaran, and West Azerbaijan in the higher risk of infection greater than 100 people per day. Therefore, controlling this movement can prevent great numbers of infection, remarkably.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Iran; Pandemic; Risk assessment; Sub-epidemic; Travel
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33215282 PMCID: PMC7676861 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11644-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Results of epidemic analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic
Fig. 2Results of estimation of sub-epidemic waves
Fig. 3Results of estimation of sub-epidemic waves
The comparison of some COVID-19 outbreak prediction models used in the literature
| Reference | Country | Prediction model | Disadvantages | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Alzahrani et al. | Saudi Arabia | ARIMA | Improper for pandemic forecasting Without knowledge of epidemic properties Weak for long-term time series forecasting | Proper for first-order time series trend |
| (Sarkar et al. | India | SARIIqSq | Appropriate only for single-peak models | Applying people quarantining factors to prediction Used susceptible, asymptomatic, recovered, and infected factors |
| (Singhal et al. | India, Italy, USA | GMM | Proper for continuous prediction monitoring Appropriate only for single-peak models | Used Fourier decomposition method for transformation of time series |
| (Yang et al. | China | SEIR | Appropriate only for single-peak models | Used susceptible, exposed, infectious, and death |
| (Khan et al. | Pakistan | Vector Autoregressive | Improper for pandemic forecasting Without knowledge of epidemic properties Weak for long-term time series forecasting Improper for multi-peak epidemic | Proper for first-order time series trend |
| Presented methods | Iran | Developed GLM | Improper for incomplete single increasing trend epidemic | Proper for multiple-peak pandemic Used knowledge of epidemic properties Proper for long-term epidemic |
Fig. 4Risk of outbreaks in Iran provinces if traveling to Tehran province and vice versa
Fig. 5The network graph of internal movement between provinces