Joseph Kamtchum-Tatuene1, Luca Saba2, Mirjam R Heldner3, Michiel H F Poorthuis4, Gert J de Borst5, Tatjana Rundek6, Stavros K Kakkos7, Seemant Chaturvedi8, Raffi Topakian9, Joseph F Polak10, Glen C Jickling11. 1. Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (J.K.-T.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy (L.S.). 3. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland (M.R.H.). 4. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center (M.H.F.P.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Vascular Surgery (G.J.d.B.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (T.R.). 7. Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Greece (S.K.K.). 8. Department of Neurology, University of Maryland, Baltimore (S.C.). 9. Academic Teaching Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria (R.T.). 10. Department of Radiology, Tufts University School of Medicine and Boston University School of Medicine (J.F.P.). 11. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (G.C.J.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: IL-6 (interleukin-6) has important roles in atherosclerosis pathophysiology. To determine if anti-IL-6 therapy warrants evaluation as an adjuvant stroke prevention strategy in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, we tested whether circulating IL-6 levels predict carotid plaque severity, vulnerability, and progression in the prospective population-based CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). METHODS: Duplex carotid ultrasound was performed at baseline and 5 years. Baseline plaque severity was scored 0 to 5 based on North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial grade of stenosis. Plaque vulnerability at baseline was the presence of markedly irregular, ulcerated, or echolucent plaques. Plaque progression at 5 years was a ≥1 point increase in stenosis severity. The relationship of baseline plasma IL-6 levels with plaque characteristics was modeled using multivariable linear (severity) or logistic (vulnerability and progression) regression. Risk factors of atherosclerosis were included as independent variables. Stepwise backward elimination was used with P>0.05 for variable removal. To assess model stability, we computed the E-value or minimum strength of association (odds ratio scale) that unmeasured confounders must have with log IL-6 and the outcome to suppress the association. We performed internal validation with 100 bootstrap samples. RESULTS: There were 4334 participants with complete data (58.9% women, mean age: 72.7±5.1 years), including 1267 (29.2%) with vulnerable plaque and 1474 (34.0%) with plaque progression. Log IL-6 predicted plaque severity (β=0.09, P=1.3×10-3), vulnerability (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.40]; P=7.4×10-3, E-value=1.71), and progression (OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.23-1.69], P=9.1×10-6, E-value 2.24). In participants with >50% predicted probability of progression, mean log IL-6 was 0.54 corresponding to 2.0 pg/mL. Dichotomizing IL-6 levels did not affect the performance of prediction models. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating IL-6 predicts carotid plaque severity, vulnerability, and progression. The 2.0 pg/mL cutoff could facilitate the selection of individuals that would benefit from anti-IL-6 drugs for stroke prevention.
BACKGROUND: IL-6 (interleukin-6) has important roles in atherosclerosis pathophysiology. To determine if anti-IL-6 therapy warrants evaluation as an adjuvant stroke prevention strategy in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, we tested whether circulating IL-6 levels predict carotid plaque severity, vulnerability, and progression in the prospective population-based CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). METHODS: Duplex carotid ultrasound was performed at baseline and 5 years. Baseline plaque severity was scored 0 to 5 based on North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial grade of stenosis. Plaque vulnerability at baseline was the presence of markedly irregular, ulcerated, or echolucent plaques. Plaque progression at 5 years was a ≥1 point increase in stenosis severity. The relationship of baseline plasma IL-6 levels with plaque characteristics was modeled using multivariable linear (severity) or logistic (vulnerability and progression) regression. Risk factors of atherosclerosis were included as independent variables. Stepwise backward elimination was used with P>0.05 for variable removal. To assess model stability, we computed the E-value or minimum strength of association (odds ratio scale) that unmeasured confounders must have with log IL-6 and the outcome to suppress the association. We performed internal validation with 100 bootstrap samples. RESULTS: There were 4334 participants with complete data (58.9% women, mean age: 72.7±5.1 years), including 1267 (29.2%) with vulnerable plaque and 1474 (34.0%) with plaque progression. Log IL-6 predicted plaque severity (β=0.09, P=1.3×10-3), vulnerability (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.40]; P=7.4×10-3, E-value=1.71), and progression (OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.23-1.69], P=9.1×10-6, E-value 2.24). In participants with >50% predicted probability of progression, mean log IL-6 was 0.54 corresponding to 2.0 pg/mL. Dichotomizing IL-6 levels did not affect the performance of prediction models. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating IL-6 predicts carotid plaque severity, vulnerability, and progression. The 2.0 pg/mL cutoff could facilitate the selection of individuals that would benefit from anti-IL-6 drugs for stroke prevention.
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Jean G MacFadyen; Robert J Glynn; Wolfgang Koenig; Peter Libby; Brendan M Everett; Martin Lefkowitz; Tom Thuren; Jan H Cornel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Brendan M Everett; Tom Thuren; Jean G MacFadyen; William H Chang; Christie Ballantyne; Francisco Fonseca; Jose Nicolau; Wolfgang Koenig; Stefan D Anker; John J P Kastelein; Jan H Cornel; Prem Pais; Daniel Pella; Jacques Genest; Renata Cifkova; Alberto Lorenzatti; Tamas Forster; Zhanna Kobalava; Luminita Vida-Simiti; Marcus Flather; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Hisao Ogawa; Mikael Dellborg; Paulo R F Rossi; Roland P T Troquay; Peter Libby; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Brendan M Everett; Aruna Pradhan; Jean G MacFadyen; Daniel H Solomon; Elaine Zaharris; Virak Mam; Ahmed Hasan; Yves Rosenberg; Erin Iturriaga; Milan Gupta; Michelle Tsigoulis; Subodh Verma; Michael Clearfield; Peter Libby; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Roger Seagle; Cyril Ofori; Mohammad Saklayen; Samuel Butman; Narendra Singh; Michel Le May; Olivier Bertrand; James Johnston; Nina P Paynter; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T B Harris; L Ferrucci; R P Tracy; M C Corti; S Wacholder; W H Ettinger; H Heimovitz; H J Cohen; R Wallace Journal: Am J Med Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Jordi Sunyer; F Forastiere; J Pekkanen; E Plana; M Kolz; R Pistelli; B Jacquemin; I Brüske-Hohlfeld; Ch Pitsavos; T Bellander; W Koenig; A Peters Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 4.244