| Literature DB >> 35711973 |
Blasius Ngayakamo1, Azikiwe Peter Onwualu1.
Abstract
Eggshell waste is among of the most abundant agro-waste material discharged from food processing industries. Despite the exceptional properties and several applications, eggshell is castoff in huge quantity without any further use. This review paper focuses on appraising the potential uses of eggshell waste as a feedstock for production of sustainable construction materials. The emphasis is on the need to exploit extensively eggshell waste as a partial cement replacement material in clay and cement-based construction materials. The physical-chemical properties of eggshell powder which describe its unique characteristics are discussed. The exploitation of eggshell waste in various construction materials have resulted into an overall improvement in the physical-mechanical properties. The results from reviewed work show that, the incorporation of 5-30 % of eggshell powder has developed green sustainable construction materials with properties that are within the range for the established engineering standards. In the current paper, it was indicated that the valorisation of eggshell waste has a potential to replace cement material for production of cheap and sustainable construction materials with improved engineering properties. Based on circular economy, valorisation is regarded to be a cost-effective solution to provide eco-friendly industrial raw materials while ensuring a waste free environment in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Agro waste; Biocomposite and sustainable construction materials; Eggshell; Valorisation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35711973 PMCID: PMC9193877 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Annual egg production by the top 5 countries in 2020.
| Country | Number of eggs produced in (billions) |
|---|---|
| China | 466 |
| USA | 109 |
| India | 95 |
| Mexico | 57 |
| Brazil | 54 |
Chemical composition of calcined eggshell powder.
| Composition in (wt.%) | Eggshell powder | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
| CaO | 79.28 | 50.70 | 52.10 | 52.10 | 46.69 | 64.83 |
| Al2O3 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| SiO2 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.58 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.06 |
| Na2O | 0.19 | - | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 1.48 |
| K2O | 0.11 | - | 0.25 | - | 0.21 | 0.08 |
| MgO | 1.12 | - | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| SO3 | 0.79 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.06 |
| Cl | 0.25 | - | - | 0.09 | ||
| LOI | 17.48 | 47.80 | 45.42 | 45.42 | - | 14.4 |
Physical properties of powdered eggshell.
| Physical properties | Eggshell powder |
|---|---|
| Shape | Spherical/irregular |
| Average particle size(μm) | 1–155 |
| Specific gravity | 2.07–2.50 |
| Bulk density(g/cm3) | 2.50–2.62 [ |
| BET surface area(m2/kg) | 307–1400 |
Figure 1Preparation and potential uses of eggshell waste in development of construction materials.
Mechanical performance of concrete with Eggshell Powder.
| Reference | ESP variation(%) | ESP Optimum content | 7 days | 28 days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength (MPa) | Split tensile strength (MPa) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Compressive | Split tensile strength (MPa) | Flexural strength (MPa) | |||
| [ | 5,10,15 and 20 | 15 | 27 | 2.4 | - | 38 | 3.2 | - |
| [ | 5, 10, 15 and 20 | 15 | - | - | - | 48 · 36 | - | 10.1 |
| [ | 5, 10 and 15 | 5 | 28 | 2.2 | 5.6 | - | - | |
| [ | 5,10 and 15 | 5 | 14.4 | 1.3 | - | 24 | 2.4 | - |
| [ | 20,30 and 40 | 20 | 15.43 | 3.6 | - | 24.59 | 7.4 | - |
| [ | 10, 20 and 30 | 10 | - | - | - | 78 | - | 8.6 |
| [ | 5,10,15 and 20 | 15 | 34 | - | 2.8 | 37 | - | 3.2 |
| [ | 5,10 and 15 | 5 | 18.5 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 35 | 3.3 | 4.8 |
| [ | 0,5,10 and 15 | 5 | 15.1 | 20.19 | 2.23 | 3.51 | ||
Properties of clay bricks blended with Eggshell Powder.
| Reference | brick | Other material | ESP variation(%) | Optimum ESP(%) | Water absorption(%) | density(g/cm3) | Hardness (HV) | Max. Compressive strength(MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Fired | Granite and clay | 5.10 and 15 | 10 | 12.2 | 1.76 | 3.12 | |
| [ | Fired | - | 5,10 and 15 | 15 | 11.1 | 2.1 | 4.8 | |
| [ | Fired clay | - | 5, 10, 15 and 20 | 20 | 14.36 | 1.75 | 8.79 | 8.28 |
| [ | Fired clay | 10, 14 and 20 | 10 | <25 | - | 14.38 | ||
| [ | Fired clay | 5, 10, 15 and 20 | 20 | 14.36 | 1.75 | 8.79 | 8.28 |
Properties of ceramic tiles with Eggshell Powder as a flux.
| Reference | Tile | ESP variation (%) | Optimum ESP content(%) | Other materials (%) | Water absorption (%) | Bulk density (g/cm3) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Compressive strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Wall | 15 | 15 | Red clay and quartz | 22.71 | 1.65 | 15.29 | - |
| [ | Roof | 10, 15 and 20 | 15 | Clay and Plastic | 25 | - | 7.97 | 0.125 |
| [ | Floor | 9 | 9 | White cement and silica | 3.1 | 2.43 | 4.5 | 17.95 |
| [ | Floor | 10 and 20 | 20 | Plastic and sand | 0.15 | 1.83 | 11.7 | - |
Properties of CSBs with eggshell powder.
| Reference | Type | ESP variation(%) | ESP Optimum content | Other materials | 28 days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water absorption | Apparent density (g/cm3) | Max. Compressive strength(MPa) | |||||
| [ | Sandcrete | 5, 10,15 20,25,30,35 and 40 | 30 | Sand and cement | - | - | 4.7 |
| [ | Soil-cement block | 10, 20 and 30 | 10 | Soil and cement | 9.0 | 2.00 | 4.8 |
| [ | Soil-cement block | 10, 20 and 30 | 10 | Soil, cement and welding flux sludge | 9.5 | 1.85 | 4.85 |
| [ | Laterite-block | 10,20, 30 and 40 | 30 | Laterite | 3.94 | 2.04 | 2.87 |
| [ | Laterite-block | 2,4,8 and 16 | 2 and 4 | Sawdust ash and laterite | - | 1.75 | 1.2 |