Literature DB >> 35711776

Microbial Community, Fermentation Quality, and in vitro Degradability of Ensiling Caragana With Lactic Acid Bacteria and Rice Bran.

Jingtao You1, Huan Zhang1, Hongfu Zhu1, Yanlin Xue2, Yimin Cai3, Guijie Zhang1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of microbial inoculants and growth stage on fermentation quality, microbial community, and in vitro degradability of Caragana silage from different varieties. Caragana intermedia (CI) and Caragana korshinskii (CK) harvested at the budding (BU) and blooming (BL) stages were used as raw materials to prepare silage, respectively. The silages at each growth stage were treated for ensiling alone (control), with 5% rice bran (RB), a combination of RB with commercial Lactobacillus plantarum (RB + LP), and a combination of RB with a selected strain Lactobacillus plantarum L694 (RB + L694). The results showed that the crude protein (CP) content of CI was higher than that of CK, and delay in harvest resulted in greater CP content in Caragana at BL stage. After 60 days of fermentation, the concentrations of lactic acid (LA) in the RB + L694 treatments were higher than those in control treatments (p < 0.05), while the pH, concentrations of NH3-N, neutral detergent fiber with the addition of α-amylase (aNDF) were lower than those in control treatments (p < 0.05). RB + L694 treatments could decrease acid detergent fiber (ADF) content except in CIBL. In CK silages, adding RB + L694 could reduce bacterial diversity and richness (p < 0.05). Compared with the control, RB + L694 treatment contained higher Lactobacillus and Enterobacter (p < 0.05). In vitro NDF and DM degradability (IVNDFD and IVDMD) was mostly affected by growth period, and additive RB + l694 treatment had higher IVDMD and lower IVNDFD than other treatments (p < 0.05). Consequently, the varieties, growth stages, and additives could influence the fermentation process, while the blooming stage should be selected in both Caragana. Furthermore, the results showed that RB and L. plantarum could exert a positive effect on fermentation quality of Caragana silage by shifting bacterial community composition, and RB + L694 treatments outperformed other additives.
Copyright © 2022 You, Zhang, Zhu, Xue, Cai and Zhang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caragana silage; Lactobacillus; conserved forage; fermentation quality; microbial population; rice bran

Year:  2022        PMID: 35711776      PMCID: PMC9195136          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.804429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   6.064


  25 in total

1.  Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and bacterial diversity in corn silage contaminated with the pathogen and treated with chemical or microbial additives.

Authors:  I M Ogunade; Y Jiang; D H Kim; A A Pech Cervantes; K G Arriola; D Vyas; Z G Weinberg; K C Jeong; A T Adesogan
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Genetic divergence and gene flow among Mesorhizobium strains nodulating the shrub legume Caragana.

Authors:  Zhaojun Ji; Hui Yan; Qingguo Cui; Entao Wang; Wenxin Chen; Wenfeng Chen
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Dynamic profiles of fermentation characteristics and bacterial community composition of Broussonetia papyrifera ensiled with perennial ryegrass.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Hongsen Zhang; Yanhua Gao; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media.

Authors:  G A Broderick; J H Kang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Monitoring of the microbiota profile in nukadoko, a naturally fermented rice bran bed for pickling vegetables.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ono; Shoko Nishio; Jun Tsurii; Tetsuhiro Kawamoto; Kenji Sonomoto; Jiro Nakayama
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives.

Authors:  R E Muck; E M G Nadeau; T A McAllister; F E Contreras-Govea; M C Santos; L Kung
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar.

Authors:  M L Zheng; D Z Niu; D Jiang; S S Zuo; C C Xu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Lactobacillus silagei sp. nov., isolated from orchardgrass silage.

Authors:  Masanori Tohno; Maki Kitahara; Tomohiro Irisawa; Takaharu Masuda; Ryuichi Uegaki; Moriya Ohkuma; Kiyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Community of natural lactic acid bacteria and silage fermentation of corn stover and sugarcane tops in Africa.

Authors:  Yimin Cai; Zhumei Du; Seishi Yamasaki; Damiao Nguluve; Benedito Tinga; Felicidade Macome; Tetsuji Oya
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Assessing quality of Medicago sativa silage by monitoring bacterial composition with single molecule, real-time sequencing technology and various physiological parameters.

Authors:  Weichen Bao; Zhihui Mi; Haiyan Xu; Yi Zheng; Lai Yu Kwok; Heping Zhang; Wenyi Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.