Literature DB >> 3570993

Effects of excitatory and non-excitatory suppressor tones on two-tone rate suppression in auditory nerve fibers.

J A Costalupes, N C Rich, M A Ruggero.   

Abstract

Recordings were obtained from individual auditory nerve fibers in anesthetized chinchillas. Rate versus level functions were obtained for best frequency (BF) tones alone and for simultaneously-gated tone pairs comprising a BF tone and a second tone at a fixed intensity that produced evidence of two-tone rate suppression. Care was taken in selecting a range of suppressor tone levels that included excitatory (i.e., the suppressor tone evoked a rate change by itself) and non-excitatory (i.e., no suppressor tone-evoked rate increase) suppressor tone levels. Addition of a suppressor tone produced a shift of the dynamic range portion of the BF rate versus level function to higher test intensities. A parallel shift of the dynamic range portion of the rate versus level function was associated with a non-excitatory suppressor tone. The shift produced by an excitatory suppressor tone was characterized by a decrease in slope. Results indicated that the magnitude of shift increased monotonically as suppressor tone intensity was raised and that there was a gradual transition from a non-excitatory response to an excitatory response. The rate of shift (i.e., dB of shift per dB change in suppressor tone intensity) did not differ for non-excitatory versus excitatory responses, but was substantially greater for below-BF suppressor tones (1.38 dB/dB) than for above-BF suppressor tones (0.54 dB/dB). The rate of shift did not, however, appear to be related systematically to suppressor tone frequency separation from BF. Above- and below-BF suppression was noted for fibers over the range of best frequencies tested (110 Hz to 16.4 kHz).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3570993     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90107-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Basilar membrane responses to two-tone and broadband stimuli.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich; A Recio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

4.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones.

Authors:  A N Temchin; N C Rich; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?

Authors:  Mark Fletcher; Jessica de Boer; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.