Sam Wilson1, Dan-Hong Li1, Alexander V Ruban1. 1. Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Abstract
The major photosystem II light-harvesting antenna (LHCII) is the most abundant membrane protein in nature and plays an indispensable role in light harvesting and photoprotection in the plant thylakoid. Here, we show that "pseudothylakoid characteristics" can be observed in artificial LHCII membranes. In our proteoliposomal system, at high LHCII densities, the liposomes become stacked, mimicking the in vivo thylakoid grana membranes. Furthermore, an unexpected, unstructured emission peak at ∼730 nm appears, similar in appearance to photosystem I emission, but with a clear excimeric character that has never been previously reported. These states correlate with the increasing density of LHCII in the membrane and a decrease in its average fluorescence lifetime. The appearance of these low-energy states can also occur in natural plant membrane structures, which has unique consequences for the interpretation of the spectroscopic and physiological properties of the photosynthetic membrane.
The major photosystem II light-harvesting antenna (LHCII) is the most abundant membrane protein in nature and plays an indispensable role in light harvesting and photoprotection in the plant thylakoid. Here, we show that "pseudothylakoid characteristics" can be observed in artificial LHCII membranes. In our proteoliposomal system, at high LHCII densities, the liposomes become stacked, mimicking the in vivo thylakoid grana membranes. Furthermore, an unexpected, unstructured emission peak at ∼730 nm appears, similar in appearance to photosystem I emission, but with a clear excimeric character that has never been previously reported. These states correlate with the increasing density of LHCII in the membrane and a decrease in its average fluorescence lifetime. The appearance of these low-energy states can also occur in natural plant membrane structures, which has unique consequences for the interpretation of the spectroscopic and physiological properties of the photosynthetic membrane.
Photosystems
I (PSI) and II
(PSII) harvest solar energy to generate oxygen and stable high-energy
chemical compounds that are vital for life on Earth. Light-harvesting
complex II (LHCII) plays a key role in light harvesting in green plants
and algae, allowing efficient delivery of excitation energy into the
reaction centers (RC) of the photosystems.[1] Dynamic changes in the aggregation state of LHCII in the thylakoid
membrane have been shown to be a significant fingerprint inherent
to the regulation of light harvesting.[2−5] Under illumination, photosynthetic electron
transport induces a transthylakoid proton gradient, which acts in
a negative feedback loop as the trigger to switch LHCII from a light-harvesting
to photoprotective state, and thus of LHCII aggregation itself.[2,6] These processes are further promoted by the low-pH activation of
the PsbS protein and de-epoxidation of the LHCII-bound carotenoid
violaxanthin into the more hydrophobic zeaxanthin.[2−4] In this photoprotective
state, excess absorbed light energy is dissipated as heat in a process
termed energy-dependent nonphotochemical quenching (hereafter, qE).[3,7] qE works to prevent photoinhibition of the PSII reaction center
(RCII) and fine-tune the PSII quantum yield.A fundamental technique
for observing the energetic states of both
photosystems has been to monitor chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence emission
at low temperatures where biochemical processes are arrested, the
lifetimes of fluorescent species are longer, and emission peaks are
more narrow and consequently more easily resolved.[8] From these measurements, distinctive spectra can be observed.
In plants, it is commonly accepted that the emission peaks at 680
nm (F680) and 700 nm (F700) arise from LHCII[9,10] while
peaks at ∼685 and ∼695 nm arise from the PSII core antenna
proteins CP43 and CP47, respectively.[11] A broad peak centered at ∼735 nm (F735) has been shown to
be associated with PSI,[12] with the red-most
emission arising from the PSI light-harvesting antenna complex (LHCI).[13] While these assignments are well accepted within
the literature at large, there may be some overlap between the bands.
Concomitant with the formation of the qE state and the quenching of
the F680 band, an increase in the intensity of the F700 band has been
observed at 77 K, and it is often used as a signature of LHCII aggregation.[14−16] However, these states have also been readily observed under experimental
conditions where aggregation is unachievable.[17−19] Thus, it appears
that these states are inherent to individual LHCII trimers, but the
quenched conformational state, in which the F700 emission is prominent,
is stabilized by aggregation.[19] In this
work, we have constructed LHCII-containing proteoliposomes with a
range of protein densities. Static control of LHCII packing allows
for the capture and stabilization of states that have been seen in vivo yet have eluded study due to the heterogeneous nature
of complex natural systems.Recent biochemical analysis has
shown that there is an approximate
1:1 (gram:gram) lipid:Chl ratio in the PSII-enriched stacked grana
of the thylakoid membrane.[20] Accordingly,
we decided to use this as one of the physiological extremes in the
construction of the proteoliposomes, despite differences in bulk lipid
composition. In our system, the average rate of incorporation of Chl
into the membrane was 86.6 ± 6.5% of the initial starting amount,
with no apparent dependence on the initial Chl:lipid ratio. Hereafter,
any ratios in the text and figures represent final calculated Chl:lipid
molar ratios. As the main comparison points, proteoliposomes with
low (∼0.08:1) and high densities (∼0.80:1) of LHCII
were primarily utilized.Here, we show a typical spherical topology
for the low-density
proteoliposomes (Figure A). Each particle reached an average diameter of 59.2 ± 2.58
nm, with an average bilayer thickness of 3.63 ± 0.06 nm (Figure C,D). The bilayer
thicknesses reported here are similar to those reported for in vitro and in silico DOPC membranes[21,22] and in vivo thylakoid membranes.[23] The high-density liposomes, however, display a largely
divergent appressed morphology (Figure B). Particle sizes are larger than those of the low-density
proteoliposomes at 75.8 ± 2.06 nm, with an apparent thickness
of 6.05 ± 0.07 nm (Figure C,D). While the larger particle size may be ascribed to the
greater LHCII:lipid ratio, the increase in the apparent thickness
appears to indicate that the high-density proteoliposomes are stacked.
Stacking of thylakoid grana membranes has been shown to be primarily
reliant on the presence of LHCII[24−26] and the net membrane
surface charge.[26−30] Interestingly, addition of Mg2+ to the high-density proteoliposomes
appeared to promote stacking of the appressed membranes, further mimicking
the in vivo grana structure (Figure S4). These data indicate that LHCII, a bilayer-forming
lipid, and an appropriate net surface charge may be a minimal requirement
for the formation of the classical thylakoid grana superstructure.
Figure 1
Microscopic
analysis of LHCII proteoliposomes. (A) Representative
cryo-EM micrograph of low-density LHCII proteoliposomes. The scale
bar represents 100 nm. The 0.08:1 ratio represents the final chlorophyll:lipid
molar ratio. (B) Representative cryo-EM micrograph of high-density
LHCII proteoliposomes. The scale bar represents 100 nm. The 0.79:1
ratio represents the final chlorophyll:lipid molar ratio. (C) Particle
sizes of low- and high-density proteoliposomes. Statistical significance
determined via a Student’s t test. White dots
represent 5th and 95th percentile values. The x-axis
shows chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios. (D) Apparent membrane thicknesses
of low- and high-density proteoliposomes. Statistical significance
determined via a Student’s t test. White dots
represent 5th and 95th percentile values. The x-axis
shows chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios.
Microscopic
analysis of LHCII proteoliposomes. (A) Representative
cryo-EM micrograph of low-density LHCII proteoliposomes. The scale
bar represents 100 nm. The 0.08:1 ratio represents the final chlorophyll:lipid
molar ratio. (B) Representative cryo-EM micrograph of high-density
LHCII proteoliposomes. The scale bar represents 100 nm. The 0.79:1
ratio represents the final chlorophyll:lipid molar ratio. (C) Particle
sizes of low- and high-density proteoliposomes. Statistical significance
determined via a Student’s t test. White dots
represent 5th and 95th percentile values. The x-axis
shows chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios. (D) Apparent membrane thicknesses
of low- and high-density proteoliposomes. Statistical significance
determined via a Student’s t test. White dots
represent 5th and 95th percentile values. The x-axis
shows chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios.In detergent, LHCII has an average fluorescence lifetime (τavg) of ∼4 ns.[31] However,
addition of LHCII to a liposome initially decreased the τavg to ∼2 ns, independent of protein–protein
interactions in the membrane (Figure A), in line with previous reports.[32−39] As the protein density in the liposome was increased, the τavg decreased progressively to ∼500 ps (Figure A and Supplementary Table 1). Here it is likely that stabilization of the energy-dissipative
conformation of LHCII is promoted in environments in which the probability
of LHCII aggregation is increased. Unexpectedly, however, the dominant
feature of the 77 K emission spectra is the appearance of the broad,
unstructured emission at ∼731 nm (hereafter, F730) that correlates
with increasing LHCII density in the membrane (Figure C). Initially, the spectra of LHCII in a
low-protein density membrane resemble the emission spectra seen in
prior proteoliposomal studies,[40−42] where the appearance of F700
appears to cause a broadening of the F680 peak. However, as the LHCII
protein density is increased, the stoichiometry of F700 and F730 continues
to increase similarly until a τavg of ∼1 ns
is achieved (Figure B). After this point, F730 appears to become more dominant until
the maximum τavg of ∼500 ps, where F700 is
seemingly largely overlapped by it. At 77 K, the τavg of the F730 was ∼5 ns, similar to those in previous reports.[43] Interestingly, at room temperature, there is
only a slight difference in the bulk fluorescence spectra of the proteoliposomes
(Figure S5). The absorption spectrum of
low-density membranes reveals a blue-shifted chlorophyll a maximum indicative of either a change in chlorophyll environment
or an alteration in pigment–protein or pigment–pigment
interactions (Figure S5A). Such blue shifts
are often accompanied by blue-shifted fluorescence. However, in this
case, the fluorescence spectrum remained unchanged (Figure S5B). Therefore, it is possible that in the low-density
membranes the pigment–pigment interactions were perturbed.
This would result in a different excitonic profile, but without compromising
either the efficiency of energy transfer to the terminal emitter or
the state of the terminal emitter chlorophylls, such as their binding
or environment. Furthermore, while the F700 band appears to poorly
correlate with overall fluorescence quenching (Fq) in this system, the relationship between Fq and the F730 band remains approximately linear (Figure D). Therefore, the
amplitude of the F730 band appears to correlate strongly with LHCII
quenching.
Figure 2
Appearance of the F730 band and its correlation with fluorescence
lifetime and LHCII density in the proteoliposome. (A) 293 K fluorescence
lifetimes of LHCII in detergent and a range of LHCII proteoliposomes
with differing chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios. The excitation wavelength
was 468 nm. Emission was measured at 680 nm. (B) Correlation between
the average lifetimes (τavg) of LHCII proteoliposomes
and F700:F680 (black) and F730:F680 (red) 77 K fluorescence peak ratios.
(C) 77 K fluorescence emission spectra of LHCII in detergent and a
range of LHCII proteoliposomes with differing chlorophyll:lipid molar
ratios. The excitation wavelength was 436 nm. Spectra are normalized
to their respective F680 peak. (D) Correlation between 77 K fluorescence
peak ratios and fluorescence quenching (Fq): F700:F680 (black) and F730:F680 (red). Fluorescence quenching
measured as (Fm – Fm′)/Fm′, where Fm represents the ∼2 ns average lifetime
taken from the lowest-density proteoliposomes and Fm′ is the measured average lifetime value of each
proteoliposome preparation.
Appearance of the F730 band and its correlation with fluorescence
lifetime and LHCII density in the proteoliposome. (A) 293 K fluorescence
lifetimes of LHCII in detergent and a range of LHCII proteoliposomes
with differing chlorophyll:lipid molar ratios. The excitation wavelength
was 468 nm. Emission was measured at 680 nm. (B) Correlation between
the average lifetimes (τavg) of LHCII proteoliposomes
and F700:F680 (black) and F730:F680 (red) 77 K fluorescence peak ratios.
(C) 77 K fluorescence emission spectra of LHCII in detergent and a
range of LHCII proteoliposomes with differing chlorophyll:lipid molar
ratios. The excitation wavelength was 436 nm. Spectra are normalized
to their respective F680 peak. (D) Correlation between 77 K fluorescence
peak ratios and fluorescence quenching (Fq): F700:F680 (black) and F730:F680 (red). Fluorescence quenching
measured as (Fm – Fm′)/Fm′, where Fm represents the ∼2 ns average lifetime
taken from the lowest-density proteoliposomes and Fm′ is the measured average lifetime value of each
proteoliposome preparation.While the F700 band is commonly associated with LHCII, the far-red
LHCII emission states have been seen in single-molecule spectroscopy
(SMS) experiments, albeit at a much lower yield and frequency.[19,44] Furthermore, these fluorescence states have been shown to be highly
sensitive to external electric fields[45] and show a strong temperature dependence,[43,46] both of which are features of excited states with a strong charge
transfer (CT) character.[47] Similarly, large
LHCII aggregates have been shown to display strong electron–phonon
coupling in the red-most Chls, indicative of Chl–Chl CT character
under such conditions.[48] It has been hypothesized
that the large red shifts in the fluorescence profile of LHCII are
due to particular protein conformations that induce the aforementioned
CT character that would otherwise have a low probability of access
in detergent.[44] Moreover, we have shown
that the appearance of the F700 and F730 bands can be achieved through
both detergent removal (Figure S6) and
incubation in a glycerol-rich medium (Figure S7). Thus, it appears that environmental perturbations to the conformation
of LHCII due to lipid–protein interactions, changes in the
hydration state and salt content, and changes in specific protein–protein
and packing dynamics in the membrane each can promote and stabilize
the F700 and F730 emission sites, concurrent with quenching of τavg.As there are similar far-red emission bands in the
LHCII proteoliposomes
and PSI, we compared the fluorescence emission and excitation spectra
of both with stacked thylakoid membranes (Figure ). In each emission spectrum, the far-red
region is dominated by a broad band (Figure A). In the excitation spectrum, for both
PSI and thylakoid, the associated Chls display a broad absorption
with maxima at ∼678 nm, with accompanying absorption in the
far-red region up to ∼710 nm (Figure B). However, the LHCII proteoliposomes display
a very different excitation spectrum. In this case, the maximum peak
is blue-shifted by ∼4 nm to 674 nm, and the Chl b peak at 648 nm is much more prominent (Figure B). Most strikingly, the LHCII proteoliposomes
display a sharp cutoff after the 674 nm maximum, with seemingly no
corresponding far-red absorbing Chl, unlike the spectra for both PSI
and the thylakoid membranes. This corresponds well to the absorption
spectra, in which even the red-shifted Q absorption of the high-density proteoliposome is still blue-shifted
with respect to that of isolated PSI (Figures S2 and S5). In PSI, the red-most absorption and emission bands
arise from asparagine-mediated coordination of Chl a603 in the Lhca4 isoform of LHCI. Through site-directed mutagenesis,
removal of this particular coordination results in a large blue shift
of the absorption and emission to spectra that resemble those of LHCII.[49] It is probable that subtle changes in the conformations
of Chl dimers in both LHCI and LHCII are largely responsible for fine-tuning
the absorption and emission characteristics, with a certain shared
plasticity between each.[18]
Figure 3
Identity of the F730
band through spectroscopic homology between
isolated proteins and membranes. (A) 77 K fluorescence emission spectra
of LHCII in a high-density proteoliposome (black), PSI in detergent
(blue), and stacked spinach thylakoid membranes (red). The excitation
wavelength was 436 nm. Spectra are normalized to their respective
maxima. (B) 77 K excitation spectra for LHCII in a high-density proteoliposome
(black), PSI in detergent (blue), and stacked spinach thylakoid membranes
(red). The emission wavelength was 745 nm. Spectra are here normalized
to their respective maxima.
Identity of the F730
band through spectroscopic homology between
isolated proteins and membranes. (A) 77 K fluorescence emission spectra
of LHCII in a high-density proteoliposome (black), PSI in detergent
(blue), and stacked spinach thylakoid membranes (red). The excitation
wavelength was 436 nm. Spectra are normalized to their respective
maxima. (B) 77 K excitation spectra for LHCII in a high-density proteoliposome
(black), PSI in detergent (blue), and stacked spinach thylakoid membranes
(red). The emission wavelength was 745 nm. Spectra are here normalized
to their respective maxima.However, in the LHCII proteoliposomes, the appearance of F730 emission
(Figure A) does not
correspond with any additional far-red absorption (Figure B), again in agreement with
the observed bulk absorption spectra. This raises fundamental questions
about the nature of these states. It is thus likely that the F730
state results from an excited state Chl–Chl or Chl–carotenoid
interaction that does not exist in the ground state. In solution,
similar behavior has been observed due to the formation of excimers
or exciplexes, i.e., molecular dimers that are associated in the excited
state yet dissociate during the transition to the ground state.[50,51] These states result in an unstructured red-shifted emission that
lacks a ground state absorption and were often proposed to originate
from a mixture of CT and pure exciton states.[50,51] Therefore, due to these features, the F730 band may likely arise
from excimer or exciplex fluorescence in LHCII. While some reports
have ascribed the F735 band in PSI to excimer fluorescence,[52] the F735 band has associated far-red-absorbing
chlorophylls that exist in the ground state, unlike the F730 band
we have characterized in LHCII (Figure B). Hence, the F730 fluorescence appears to arise from
chlorophylls that interact when excited yet exist as single monomers
in the ground state. Even though the F730 and F735 bands appear with
a similar fluorescence fingerprint, their ground state characteristics
are highly divergent.Mixed CT-exciton states are broadly accepted
to be an intrinsic
property of the PSI antenna protein LHCI,[52−54] responsible
for the majority of the broad F735 emission traditionally known as
the fingerprint of PSI (Figure and Figure S2). In LHCI, these
states have been previously associated with a Chl a/b heterodimer located in the lutein (Lut) 2 site.[18,53,54] Structural homology between the Lut2 sites
in LHCI and LHCII had initially led to the hypothesis that the red-most
emission states may arise from the Chl a603–b609–Lut2 locus in LHCII.[44] While SMS measurements have shown that F700 does not correlate with
fluorescence blinking,[19] Stark fluorescence
(SF) measurements on quenched LHCII show that F730 displays an inverse
response to the electric field relative to F700, suggesting that the
two states may act as competitive decay channels.[45] Instead, the F730 state has been shown to strongly correlate
with fluorescence blinking and increased qE conditions.[19] These data have led to the suggestion that while
F700 originates in the Lut2 locus, F730 arises from the terminal emitter
Chl a610–a611–a612–Lut1 locus, which is also the putative site
of qE.[19,55] SF measurements have further identified
far-red emission bands in the aggregated minor antenna proteins CP24
and CP26, each of which contains regions that resemble the Lut1 site
of LHCII.[56] Moreover, there is an absence
of far-red emission bands in aggregated core antenna proteins where
there are no loci analogous to the Lut1 domain of LHCII.[57] Thus, the unique excimeric properties of F730,
relative to F700 and F735, may arise from the environmental characteristics
of the LHCII Lut1 locus.The data presented thus far raise the
questions of whether the
LHCII F730 states exist in vivo and what physiological
role these states may play. These far-red emission states may have
been previously observed in in vivo systems but have
mainly so far been ascribed to a population of PSI or uncoupled LHCI.[4,58−60] To address this, we isolated thylakoid membranes
and grana from wild type (WT) and lincomycin-grown (Linc-WT) Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). Thylakoid
membranes from plants grown on the chloroplast ribosome inhibitor
lincomycin represent a physiological extreme where LHCII is largely
overexpressed relative to RCII and PSI, similar to plants grown under
low light.[24,32,61] Relative to the WT thylakoids, we show that there is a large enrichment
of LHCII in the isolated grana and Linc-WT membranes, relative to
decreased levels of LHCI and PSI core complexes (Figure A and Figure S8). For the WT condition, this has an expected effect on the
emission spectra, where the RCII-associated emission bands at 683
and 692 nm are largely unaffected, while there is a large decrease
in the far-red emission and a subtle reduction in the F680 shoulder
(Figure B and Figure S9). However, in the Linc-WT grana, the
emission spectrum is dominated by the appearance of F730 emission,
despite the reduction in overall PSI content. Furthermore, the blue
shift of F730 in the Linc-WT grana relative to the WT grana may reflect
a smaller contribution of F735-emitting species. Moreover, the presence
of RCII in the WT grana may act to prevent formation of larger LHCII
aggregates, diminishing the predominance of the F730-emitting states.
Figure 4
F730 band in vivo. (A) Western blot analysis of
Lhcb1, Lhca1, and PsaB in WT Arabidopsis thylakoid
membranes, WT Arabidopsis grana membranes, and Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana membranes. 100% corresponds to 3 μg
of total chlorophyll mL–1. (B) 77 K fluorescence
emission spectra of WT Arabidopsis thylakoid membranes
(black), WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (red), and
Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (blue). The excitation
wavelength at 436 nm. Spectra are normalized to their respective maxima
at ∼680–685 nm. (C) 77 K excitation spectra of WT Arabidopsis thylakoid membranes (black), WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (red), and Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana
membranes (blue). The emission wavelength was 745 nm. Spectra are
normalized to their respective maxima.
F730 band in vivo. (A) Western blot analysis of
Lhcb1, Lhca1, and PsaB in WT Arabidopsis thylakoid
membranes, WT Arabidopsis grana membranes, and Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana membranes. 100% corresponds to 3 μg
of total chlorophyll mL–1. (B) 77 K fluorescence
emission spectra of WT Arabidopsis thylakoid membranes
(black), WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (red), and
Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (blue). The excitation
wavelength at 436 nm. Spectra are normalized to their respective maxima
at ∼680–685 nm. (C) 77 K excitation spectra of WT Arabidopsis thylakoid membranes (black), WT Arabidopsis grana membranes (red), and Linc-WT Arabidopsis grana
membranes (blue). The emission wavelength was 745 nm. Spectra are
normalized to their respective maxima.To try to deconvolute the nature of these bands, we further measured
excitation spectra for the far-red emission under each condition (Figure C and Figure S9). The WT thylakoid spectrum again reflects
a predominant contribution of PSI to the far-red emission, with a
maximum located at 678 nm and a broad tail into the far-red region
(Figures B and 4C). Similarly, the WT grana excitation still displays
a far-red absorption tail, albeit at a lower amplitude. However, here
the maximum is blue-shifted to 675 nm, with a slight increase in the
Chl b-associated 648 nm band, each feature likely
indicative of a stronger influence of LHCII on the emission spectrum.
Interestingly, there are noteworthy differences in the excitation
spectrum for the Linc-WT F730 band. Here, the far-red absorption tail
is nearly absent, the maximum is blue-shifted to 674 nm, and the 648
nm peak becomes much more dominant. This again likely indicates an
overwhelming contribution of LHCII to the large F730 seen in these
membranes. While these emission states do likely represent an admixture
of LHCI/PSI and LHCII, it is clear that the amplitude of F730 may
not correlate with PSI content and may be influenced by the LHCII
packing conditions, even in in vivo membranes. Thus,
particular care should be taken in the physiological analysis of 77
K emission spectra, for example in the analysis of state transitions
or the PSII:PSI ratio. This may be an issue in transgenic organisms
or under growth conditions where LHCII is principally affected.As the appearance of F730 is strongly linked to quenching of LHCII,
its relevance to qE remains a key question. In previous studies on
WT[15] and lincomycin-grown plants[43,60] and native LHCII aggregates,[4] the F730
band appears to become largely quenched in the qE state. Thus, it
is unlikely that this state plays a role as a direct quencher itself.
As the putative location of the F730 band is shared with the qE locus
in the LHCII Lut1 site,[19] alterations in
the coupling of the Lut1 S1 state to the Chl a611–a612 homodimer in the qE state may quench
F730 emission. Therefore, we propose that F730 may be an indicator
of an LHCII aggregation state and environment tuned for qE.To summarize, we have constructed a range of minimal LHCII proteoliposomes
that display variable characteristics that resemble the thylakoid
as a whole. High densities of LHCII in the membrane cause stacking
of the proteoliposomes, which can form larger superstructures that
resemble the in vivo grana membranes of plants. Furthermore,
we have shown that the specific conformational substates of LHCII
that display the F700 and F730 states are promoted by aggregation
in the proteoliposomal membrane. These states are likely due to specific
environmental alterations to the structure of LHCII and the pigment–pigment
interactions therein. Despite initial similarities to F735 of PSI,
we have shown F730 to be distinct in nature and present in natural
membranes under certain conditions. We suggest that F730 results from
excimer fluorescence originating from the pigments of the LHCII Lut1
site. Thus, this is the first direct evidence of the occurrence of
such associates within LHCII complexes that can be established only
in the excited state, a feature of a true localized exciton.
Experimental
Methods
Plant Material and Growth Conditions. Spinach
(Spinacia oleracea) was obtained from a local market
and adapted to the dark for 45 min prior to any experiment. WT Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Col-0)
seeds were sterilized in 50% (v/v) ethanol and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100
and stored for 48 h at 4 °C before being sown on a 6:6:1 Levington
M3 compost/John Innes No. 3 soil/Perlite mixture (Scotts). Control
experiments on WT Arabidopsis were carried out on
4–5-week-old plants grown at 200 μmol of photons m–2 s–1, with a 10 h photoperiod at
22 °C. Lincomycin-treated WT plants (Linc-WT) were treated as
previously described,[32] under the same
growth conditions as control plants. Plants were grown in a Percival
AR-75L3 plant growth cabinet (Percival Scientific Inc.) equipped with
Phillips MASTER TL-D Super 80 36 W/840 bulbs, which emit a cool white
light (Koninklijke Philips N.V.). Before each experiment, plants were
adapted to the dark for 45 min.Sample Preparation and
Biochemical Analysis. Stacked
thylakoid membranes were isolated as previously described,[4] as were isolated grana membranes.[20] LHCII was isolated from PSII-enriched spinach
BBY particles,[62] using a ratio of 0.6%
(w/v) β-DM to 1 mg of Chl mL–1 to solubilize;
PSI was similarly isolated from spinach stacked thylakoid membranes,
using a ratio of 1% (w/v) β-DM to 1 mg of Chl mL–1 to solubilize. Either solubilized protein extract, at a concentration
of 250–300 μg of total Chl, was loaded on a seven-step
0.15 to 1 M exponential sucrose density gradient and centrifuged for
18–20 h at 40 000 rpm and 4 °C, as previously described.[63] The protein purity was confirmed through the
characteristic absorption and fluorescence spectra (Figures S1 and S2) and sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) analysis (Figure S3). Western blot and SDS–PAGE experiments were
undertaken on isolated proteins and membranes as previously described,[4,64] with equal amounts of total Chl (1–3 μg) loaded onto
each lane per sample. Chl was quantified as described previously.[65] Prior to any experiment, the isolated protein
complex was run through a PD-10 desalting column into a buffer containing
10 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), and 0.03% (w/v) β-DM [or 0.01%
(w/v) β-DM for overnight glycerol incubation, as in Figure S7]. The pigment composition was further
analyzed through reverse-phase HPLC (Supplementary Table 2) using a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 column with a 5 μm
particle size (Merck) and a Dionex Summit chromatography system (Dionex),
as previously described.[66]In vitro aggregation of LHCII was achieved using
BioBeads SM-2 resin (Bio-Rad), as described previously.[55] For glycerol incubation experiments, LHCII was
incubated in a buffer containing 70% (v/v) glycerol, 10 mM NaCl, 20
mM HEPES (pH 7.6), and 0.01% β-DM for 20 h at 4 °C. For
all other experiments, no sample was left in a glycerol medium for
more than 1 h to avoid artifacts induced by a glycerol-rich solvent.Proteoliposomes were formed in a manner similar to multiple previously
published protocols,[40,41,67−70] with the following minor alterations. Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
(DOPC) in chloroform (Avanti Polar Lipids) was placed in a glass vial
and with the solvent evaporated under a steady flow of N2, while being rotated to form a thin film. The film was then resuspended
in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6) and 10 mM NaCl for a final
DOPC concentration of 1 mg mL–1. The resulting solution
was vortexed for 2 min and subsequently passed through a 100 nm pore
extruder, as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Avanti Polar
Lipids). Then, 0.03% (w/v) β-DM was added to the lipid solution
and the mixture incubated at 4 °C for 15 min. Isolated LHCII
was then added at the required Chl:lipid ratio and sonicated in a
water bath for 5 min. To remove detergent from the LHCII/lipid liposomes,
45 mg mL–1 BioBeads SM-2 resin (Bio-Rad) was added
and the mixture incubated while rotating for 2 h at room temperature,
followed by an additional 45 mg mL–1 overnight at
4 °C. BioBeads were then removed by running the resultant mixture
through one layer of muslin cloth, before centrifugation at 15 000
rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to pellet any LHCII aggregates that were
not incorporated into proteoliposomes. Thereafter, the proteoliposomal
solution was separated from the large aggregates and stored at 4 °C.
Chl was quantified in the pellet and proteoliposomal solution, as
previously described.[65]Cryo-Electron
Microscopy. For visualization, proteoliposomes
were loaded onto a lacey grid and plunge frozen using a Leica EM GP2
instrument (Leica Microsystems) before imaging on a JEOL JEM-2100plus
electron microscope (JEOL) equipped with a OneView Gatan camera (AMETEK)
using the SerialEM software package.[71] Images
were analyzed using ImageJ.[72] Statistical
significance between results was determined using a Student’s t test. For experiments that examined the stacking of the
proteoliposomes, 5 mM MgCl2 was added to the final preparation
of high-density proteoliposomes and the mixture incubated for 1 h
prior to grid preparation.Spectroscopic Analysis. Steady state fluorescence
spectra were recorded for samples at a concentration of 6 μg
of total Chl mL–1 using a FluoroMax-3 spectrofluorimeter
(HORIBA Jobin Yvon, Longjumeau, France). The 77 K measurements were
taken in 1 cm path length cuvettes in an Optistat DN liquid nitrogen-cooled
bath cryostat (Oxford Instruments). Protein and proteoliposome samples
were resuspended in a buffer containing 70% (v/v) glycerol, 10 mM
NaCl, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), with 0.03% (w/v) β-DM added
to the buffer for isolated protein, while in vivo membrane samples were resuspended in a reaction medium containing
70% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.33 M sorbitol, and 20
mM HEPES (pH 7.6). For emission spectra, samples were excited at 436
nm and emission was detected between 600 and 800 nm, with the detector
defined by a long-pass filter with a sharp cutoff at 650 nm. Excitation
spectra of the F730 band were recorded at 745 nm and measured from
620 to 735 nm, with the detector defined by a long-pass filter with
a sharp cutoff at 715 nm. The optical path length was 1 cm. The spectral
correction was applied within the FluorEssence software, according
to the manufacturer’s specifications (HORIBA Jobin Yvon).Time-correlated single-photon counting (FluoTime 200 Fluorimeter,
PicoQuant) measurements were performed to quantify the fluorescence
lifetime of a sample. Samples were excited at 468 nm using a 0.6 mW
laser diode at a 20 MHz repetition rate, with fluorescence detected
at 680 nm with a 2 nm slit width. The optical path length was 1 cm.
All samples were measured at a concentration of 6 μg of total
Chl mL–1. This setup has been previously demonstrated
to have a negligible probability of singlet–singlet annihilation
artifacts.[35] These data were analyzed using
the FluoFit software (PicoQuant), with the χ2 parameter
and autocorrelation functions used to assess the quality of the fit.
Average lifetimes were calculated as described previously.[64,73] Fluorescence quenching was calculated as Fq = (Fm – Fm′)/Fm′, where Fm and Fm′
are the maximum fluorescence yields in the dark and light, respectively. Fm was taken as the ∼2 ns lifetime taken
from the 0.08:1 proteoliposomes, corresponding to the Fm fluorescence lifetime previously reported for LHCII
in intact thylakoid membranes.[32−39]Room-temperature absorption spectra were recorded on samples
at
a concentration of 6 μg of total Chl mL–1 on
a modernized Aminco DW-2000 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Olis
Inc.), with an x-axis resolution of 1 nm. The optical
path length was 1 cm.
Authors: Jevgenij Chmeliov; Andrius Gelzinis; Egidijus Songaila; Ramūnas Augulis; Christopher D P Duffy; Alexander V Ruban; Leonas Valkunas Journal: Nat Plants Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 15.793
Authors: Alexander V Ruban; Rudi Berera; Cristian Ilioaia; Ivo H M van Stokkum; John T M Kennis; Andrew A Pascal; Herbert van Amerongen; Bruno Robert; Peter Horton; Rienk van Grondelle Journal: Nature Date: 2007-11-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yuliya Miloslavina; Irina Grouneva; Petar H Lambrev; Bernard Lepetit; Reimund Goss; Christian Wilhelm; Alfred R Holzwarth Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2009-05-29