| Literature DB >> 35708020 |
Xiao-Yi Zhong1, Yi Guo2, Zhen Fan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial DNA (MtDNA) exposed to the extracellular space due to cell death and stress has immunostimulatory properties. However, the clinical significance of circulating MtDNA in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and the precise mechanism of its emergence have yet to be investigated.Entities:
Keywords: anuria; inflammation; maintenance hemodialysis; mitochondrial DNA; mitochondrial damage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35708020 PMCID: PMC9279998 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 3.124
Characteristics of the MHD and healthy control groups
| Variable | HC ( | MHD ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.78 ± 9.09 | 51.59 ± 11.15 | −0.775 | 0.441 |
| Male ( | 18 (56.2%) | 29 (55.8%) | 0.002 | 0.966 |
| Cause of ESRD ( | ||||
| Glomerulonephritis | NR | 18 (34.6%) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | NR | 11 (21.1%) | ||
| Hypertension | NR | 6 (11.5%) | ||
| Nephrosclerosis | NR | 3 (5.7%) | ||
| Others | NR | 14 (26.9%) | ||
| Dialysis vintage (years) | NR | 3.95 ± 1.74 | ||
| Anuria ( | NR | 38 (73.1%) | ||
| Cr (μmol/L) | 77.56 ± 16.42 | 888.16 ± 388.34 | −15.030 | <0.05 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 132.63 ± 16.50 | 149.21 ± 36.58 | −2.832 | <0.05 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 82.04 ± 12.15 | 89.21 ± 27.89 | −1.618 | 0.173 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.90 ± 1.05 | 3.77 ± 1.64 | 0.396 | 0.692 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.65 ± 0.73 | 2.11 ± 1.60 | −1.747 | 0.084 |
| LDL‐C (mmol/L) | 2.82 ± 1.11 | 3.04 ± 1.36 | −0.781 | 0.437 |
| FBS (mmol/L) | 5.97 ± 1.18 | 7.64 ± 3.99 | −2.296 | <0.05 |
| Ab (g/L) | 46.83 ± 7.15 | 26.71 ± 9.45 | 10.347 | <0.05 |
| Hb (g/L) | 142.09 ± 18.28 | 88.09 ± 25.60 | 10.399 | <0.05 |
| VitD (ng/ml) | 34.12 ± 9.33 | 27.82 ± 9.14 | 3.209 | <0.05 |
| ccf‐MtDNA | 1.78 (1.03, 3.10) | 3.54 (2.56, 5.05) | −4.360 | <0.05 |
Abbreviations: Ab, albumin (g/L); ccf‐MtDNA, circulating cell‐free mitochondrial DNA (105 × 105 copies/μl); Cr, creatinine (μmol/L); DBP, diastolic blood pressure (mmHg); FBS, fasting blood sugar (mmol/L); Hb, hemoglobin (g/L); LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L); NR, not recorded; SBP, systolic blood pressure (mmHg); TC, total cholesterol (mmol/L); TG, triglyceride (mmol/L); VitD, vitamin D (ng/ml).
Plasma cytokine levels among the groups
| Variable | HC ( | MHD ( | t/Z |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF‐α (pg/ml) | 14.5 (11.71, 18.03) | 20.13 (12.87, 36.51) | −3.058 | 0.002 |
| IL‐1 | 5.65 ± 1.18 | 6.15 ± 2.68 | −1.152 | 0.253 |
| IL‐6 (pg/ml) | 1.53 ± 0.68 | 3.73 ± 1.35 | −9.893 | <0.001 |
FIGURE 1Correlation analysis between plasma TNF‐α/IL‐6 and ccf‐MtDNA in MHD patients. The results are represented as scatter plots, where each dot represents data obtained from one subject sample. Spearman correlation, r: Correlation coefficient. n = 52
Baseline characteristics of MHD patients grouped by the median value of ccf‐MtDNA
| Variable | Low ccf‐MtDNA ( | High ccf‐MtDNA ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.57 ± 11.56 | 50.61 ± 10.87 | 0.630 | 0.531 |
| Male ( | 14 (53.8%) | 15 (57.6%) | 0.078 | 0.780 |
| Glomerulonephritis ( | 10 (43.4%) | 8 (34.7%) | 0.365 | 0.546 |
| Dialysis vintage (years) | 3.32 ± 1.82 | 4.58 ± 1.44 | −2.757 | 0.008 |
| Anuria ( | 3 (11.5%) | 11 (42.3%) | 4.78 | 0.029 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 865.83 ± 273.48 | 910.50 ± 481.48 | −0.411 | 0.683 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 147.93 ± 34.26 | 150.50 ± 39.41 | −0.251 | 0.803 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 87.56 ± 29.71 | 90.85 ± 26.43 | −0.423 | 0.674 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.82 ± 1.755 | 3.72 ± 1.56 | 0.218 | 0.828 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.97 ± 1.14 | 2.23 ± 1.97 | −0.582 | 0.564 |
| LDL‐C (mmol/L) | 3.15 ± 1.41 | 2.93 ± 1.33 | 0.576 | 0.567 |
| FBS (mmol/L) | 8.42 ± 4.32 | 6.86 ± 3.55 | 1.424 | 0.161 |
| Ab (g/L) | 24.82 ± 8.11 | 28.60 ± 10.44 | −1.456 | 0.152 |
| Hb (g/L) | 86.64 ± 29.90 | 89.54 ± 20.94 | −0.406 | 0.687 |
| VitD (ng/ml) | 30.42 ± 8.59 | 25.23 ± 9.07 | 2.12 | 0.039 |
Logistic regression analysis results of the association between ccf‐MtDNA content and clinical characteristics in MHD patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Dialysis vintage | 1.60 (1.10–2.33) | 0.013 | 1.62 (1.07–2.45) | 0.021 |
| Anuria | 5.62 (1.34–23.56) | 0.018 | 6.05 (1.26–29.09) | 0.025 |
| VitD | 0.93 (0.87–1.00) | 0.045 | 0.95 (0.88–1.02) | 0.133 |
FIGURE 2Spearman's correlation between urinary MtDNA and ccf‐MtDNA in patients with residual urine production. The results are represented as scatter plots, where each dot represents data obtained from one subject sample. r: Correlation coefficient. n = 14. *p < 0.05
FIGURE 3Mitochondria appear to be impaired more severely in patients with higher ccf‐MtDNA. (A, B) ROS generation was analyzed by flow cytometry using DCFH‐DA. (C, D) Loss of Δψm was measured by flow cytometry using the JC‐1 mitochondrial probe. Low ccf‐MtDNA groups, n = 10; High ccf‐MtDNA groups, n = 10. *p < 0.05
FIGURE 4Schematic representation of MtDNA generation and diffusion and its role as a DAMP in inflammation. Mitochondria are impaired in cells in a subset of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, which may lead to the release of MtDNA from damaged mitochondria to the extracellular fluid. Some MtDNAs are excreted into the urinary space, while the MtDNAs remaining in the blood are recognized and combine with PRRs, such as TLR9, in immune cells, leading to the transcriptional activation of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Pro‐inflammatory cytokines then mature and transform into inflammatory cytokines, amplifying the inflammatory cascade, which ultimately results in inflammatory injuries