Literature DB >> 35706708

Quantifying the similarity of 2D images using edge pixels: an application to the forensic comparison of footwear impressions.

Soyoung Park1, Alicia Carriquiry1.   

Abstract

We propose a novel method to quantify the similarity between an impression (Q) from an unknown source and a test impression (K) from a known source. Using the property of geometrical congruence in the impressions, the degree of correspondence is quantified using ideas from graph theory and maximum clique (MC). The algorithm uses the x and y coordinates of the edges in the images as the data. We focus on local areas in Q and the corresponding regions in K and extract features for comparison. Using pairs of images with known origin, we train a random forest to classify pairs into mates and non-mates. We collected impressions from 60 pairs of shoes of the same brand and model, worn over six months. Using a different set of very similar shoes, we evaluated the performance of the algorithm in terms of the accuracy with which it correctly classified images into source classes. Using classification error rates and ROC curves, we compare the proposed method to other algorithms in the literature and show that for these data, our method shows good classification performance relative to other methods. The algorithm can be implemented with the R package shoeprintr.
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  62-07; 62H30; 62H35; 94C15; Maximum clique; image analysis; learning algorithms; pattern matching; shoe outsole comparison

Year:  2020        PMID: 35706708      PMCID: PMC9041871          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1779194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  8 in total

1.  Automated processing of shoeprint images based on the Fourier transform for use in forensic science.

Authors:  P de Chazal; J Flynn; R B Reilly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  A novel technique for automatic shoeprint image retrieval.

Authors:  Gharsa AlGarni; Madina Hamiane
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Classification of footwear outsole patterns using Fourier transform and local interest points.

Authors:  Nicole Richetelli; Mackenzie C Lee; Carleen A Lasky; Madison E Gump; Jacqueline A Speir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Automatic retrieval of shoeprint images using blocked sparse representation.

Authors:  Sayyad Alizadeh; Cemal Kose
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Shoeprint retrieval: Core point alignment for pattern comparison.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Gwo; Chia-Hung Wei
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Speir; Nicole Richetelli; Michael Fagert; Michael Hite; William J Bodziak
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Inherent variation in multiple shoe-sole test impressions.

Authors:  Yaron Shor; Sarena Wiesner; Tsadok Tsach; Ron Gurel; Yoram Yekutieli
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Dependence among randomly acquired characteristics on shoeprints and their features.

Authors:  Naomi Kaplan Damary; Micha Mandel; Sarena Wiesner; Yoram Yekutieli; Yaron Shor; Clifford Spiegelman
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.395

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.