Literature DB >> 27416269

Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.

Jacqueline A Speir1, Nicole Richetelli2, Michael Fagert2, Michael Hite2, William J Bodziak3.   

Abstract

Footwear evidence has tremendous forensic value; it can focus a criminal investigation, link suspects to scenes, help reconstruct a series of events, or otherwise provide information vital to the successful resolution of a case. When considering the specific utility of a linkage, the strength of the connection between source footwear and an impression left at the scene of a crime varies with the known rarity of the shoeprint itself, which is a function of the class characteristics, as well as the complexity, clarity, and quality of randomly acquired characteristics (RACs) available for analysis. To help elucidate the discrimination potential of footwear as a source of forensic evidence, the aim of this research is to further characterize the chance association in position, shape, and geometry of RACs on a semi-random selection of footwear. To accomplish this goal in an efficient manner, a partially automated image processing chain was required, including steps for automated feature characterization. This technical note details the methods, procedures, and type of results available for subsequent statistical analysis after processing a collection of more than 1000 shoes and 57,426 randomly acquired characteristics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accidentals; Feature vectors; Footwear; Fourier descriptors; Randomly acquired characteristics; Shoeprints

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27416269     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

1.  Quantifying the similarity of 2D images using edge pixels: an application to the forensic comparison of footwear impressions.

Authors:  Soyoung Park; Alicia Carriquiry
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 2.  Interpol review of shoe and tool marks 2016-2019.

Authors:  Martin Baiker-Sørensen; Koen Herlaar; Isaac Keereweer; Petra Pauw-Vugts; Richard Visser
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.

Authors:  Naomi Kaplan-Damary; Micha Mandel; Yoram Yekutieli; Yaron Shor; Sarena Wiesner
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.