Literature DB >> 35706572

Exploratory data structure comparisons: three new visual tools based on principal component analysis.

Anne Helby Petersen1, Bo Markussen2, Karl Bang Christensen1.   

Abstract

Datasets are sometimes divided into distinct subsets, e.g. due to multi-center sampling, or to variations in instruments, questionnaire item ordering or mode of administration, and the data analyst then needs to assess whether a joint analysis is meaningful. The Principal Component Analysis-based Data Structure Comparisons (PCADSC) tools are three new non-parametric, visual diagnostic tools for investigating differences in structure for two subsets of a dataset through covariance matrix comparisons by use of principal component analysis. The PCADCS tools are demonstrated in a data example using European Social Survey data on psychological well-being in three countries, Denmark, Sweden, and Bulgaria. The data structures are found to be different in Denmark and Bulgaria, and thus a comparison of for example mean psychological well-being scores is not meaningful. However, when comparing Denmark and Sweden, very similar data structures, and thus comparable concepts of well-being, are found. Therefore, inter-country comparisons are warranted for these countries.
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  62H25; 62P15; Principal component analysis; covariance matrix; data structure; exploratory data analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 35706572      PMCID: PMC9042046          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1773772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  7 in total

1.  Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.

Authors:  D Y Lin; L J Wei; Z Ying
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

Authors:  R B Cattell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1966-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Monitoring Countries in a Changing World: A New Look at DIF in International Surveys.

Authors:  Robert J Zwitser; S Sjoerd F Glaser; Gunter Maris
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Analyses of model fit and robustness. A new look at the PISA scaling model underlying ranking of countries according to reading literacy.

Authors:  Svend Kreiner; Karl Bang Christensen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Differences in mail and telephone responses to self-rated health: use of multiple imputation in correcting for response bias.

Authors:  J R Powers; G Mishra; A F Young
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  A comparison of responses to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey.

Authors:  D J Brambilla; S M McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.897

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.