Literature DB >> 35705490

Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.

Ji Zhou1, Sebastian Hormigo1, Muhammad S Sajid1, Manuel A Castro-Alamancos2.   

Abstract

While conflict between incompatible goals has well-known effects on actions, in many situations the same action may produce harmful or beneficial consequences during different periods in a nonconflicting manner, e.g., crossing the street during a red or green light. To avoid harm, subjects must be cautious to inhibit the action specifically when it is punished, as in passive avoidance, but act when it is beneficial, as in active avoidance or active approach. In mice of both sexes performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution depended on task signaling, contingency, and reinforcement type. Interestingly, caution became persistent when the signaled action was avoidance motivated by danger but was only transient when it was approach motivated by reward. Although caution is represented by the activity of neurons in the midbrain, it developed independent of frontal cortex or basal ganglia output circuits. These results indicate that caution disrupts actions in different ways depending on the motivational state and may develop from unforeseen brain circuits.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Actions, such as crossing the street at a light, can have benefits during one light signal (getting somewhere) but can be harmful during a different signal (being run over). Humans must be cautious to cross the street during the period marked by the appropriate signal. In mice performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled, delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution became persistent when the signaled action was motivated by danger, but not when it was motivated by reward. Moreover, the development of caution did not depend on prototypical frontal cortex circuits.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  approach; avoidance; basal ganglia; frontal cortex; midbrain

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35705490      PMCID: PMC9337599          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1892-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  33 in total

1.  Absence of rapid sensory adaptation in neocortex during information processing states.

Authors:  Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Circuits That Mediate Expression of Signaled Active Avoidance Converge in the Pedunculopontine Tegmentum.

Authors:  Sebastian Hormigo; German Vega-Flores; Victor Rovira; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Basal Ganglia Output Has a Permissive Non-Driving Role in a Signaled Locomotor Action Mediated by the Midbrain.

Authors:  Sebastian Hormigo; Ji Zhou; Dorian Chabbert; Bharanidharan Shanmugasundaram; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process.

Authors:  D Caroline Blanchard; Guy Griebel; Roger Pobbe; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Scott D Brown; Tom Eichele; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tiffany Ho; John Serences; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional organization of the rat amygdala with respect to avoidance behavior.

Authors:  S P Grossman; L Grossman; L Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-02

7.  Pavlovian Control of Escape and Avoidance.

Authors:  Alexander J Millner; Samuel J Gershman; Matthew K Nock; Hanneke E M den Ouden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Impact of anxiety on prefrontal cortex encoding of cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Junchol Park; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect.

Authors:  Marc Guitart-Masip; Quentin J M Huys; Lluis Fuentemilla; Peter Dayan; Emrah Duzel; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Diazepam causes sedative rather than anxiolytic effects in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Marina Pádua-Reis; Diana Aline Nôga; Adriano B L Tort; Martina Blunder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.