Literature DB >> 29244641

Pavlovian Control of Escape and Avoidance.

Alexander J Millner1, Samuel J Gershman1, Matthew K Nock1, Hanneke E M den Ouden2.   

Abstract

To survive in complex environments, animals need to have mechanisms to select effective actions quickly, with minimal computational costs. As perhaps the computationally most parsimonious of these systems, Pavlovian control accomplishes this by hardwiring specific stereotyped responses to certain classes of stimuli. It is well documented that appetitive cues initiate a Pavlovian bias toward vigorous approach; however, Pavlovian responses to aversive stimuli are less well understood. Gaining a deeper understanding of aversive Pavlovian responses, such as active avoidance, is important given the critical role these behaviors play in several psychiatric conditions. The goal of the current study was to establish a behavioral and computational framework to examine aversive Pavlovian responses (activation vs. inhibition) depending on the proximity of an aversive state (escape vs. avoidance). We introduce a novel task in which participants are exposed to primary aversive (noise) stimuli and characterized behavior using a novel generative computational model. This model combines reinforcement learning and drift-diffusion models so as to capture effects of invigoration/inhibition in both explicit choice behavior as well as changes in RT. Choice and RT results both suggest that escape is associated with a bias for vigorous action, whereas avoidance is associated with behavioral inhibition. These results lay a foundation for future work seeking insights into typical and atypical aversive Pavlovian responses involved in psychiatric disorders, allowing us to quantify both implicit and explicit indices of vigorous choice behavior in the context of aversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29244641     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advancing the Understanding of Suicide: The Need for Formal Theory and Rigorous Descriptive Research.

Authors:  Alexander J Millner; Donald J Robinaugh; Matthew K Nock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Aversive motivation and cognitive control.

Authors:  Debbie M Yee; Xiamin Leng; Amitai Shenhav; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Reinforcement learning with associative or discriminative generalization across states and actions: fMRI at 3 T and 7 T.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas; Neil M Dundon; Raphael T Gerraty; Natalie M Saragosa-Harris; Karol P Szymula; Koranis Tanwisuth; J Michael Tyszka; Camilla van Geen; Harang Ju; Arthur W Toga; Joshua I Gold; Dani S Bassett; Catherine A Hartley; Daphna Shohamy; Scott T Grafton; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  Caution Influences Avoidance and Approach Behaviors Differently.

Authors:  Ji Zhou; Sebastian Hormigo; Muhammad S Sajid; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 5.  Driven by Pain, Not Gain: Computational Approaches to Aversion-Related Decision Making in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.

Authors:  Steven Miletić; Russell J Boag; Anne C Trutti; Niek Stevenson; Birte U Forstmann; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Asymmetric coupling of action and outcome valence in active and observational feedback learning.

Authors:  Jutta Peterburs; Alena Frieling; Christian Bellebaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-22

8.  Dorsal striatal dopamine D1 receptor availability predicts an instrumental bias in action learning.

Authors:  Lieke de Boer; Jan Axelsson; Rumana Chowdhury; Katrine Riklund; Raymond J Dolan; Lars Nyberg; Lars Bäckman; Marc Guitart-Masip
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling.

Authors:  Nitzan Shahar; Tobias U Hauser; Michael Moutoussis; Rani Moran; Mehdi Keramati; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.779

10.  A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Norman H Lam; John D Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.