| Literature DB >> 35704681 |
Robert M Clancy1, Miranda C Marion2,3, Hannah C Ainsworth2,3, Miao Chang1, Timothy D Howard3,4, Peter M Izmirly1, Mala Masson1, Jill P Buyon1, Carl D Langefeld2,3.
Abstract
Anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, while strongly linked to fetal cardiac injury and neonatal rash, can associate with a spectrum of disease in the mother, ranging from completely asymptomatic to overt Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). This study was initiated to test the hypothesis that the microbiome, influenced in part by genetics, contributes to disease state. The stool microbiome of healthy controls (HC) was compared to that of anti-SSA/Ro positive women whose children had neonatal lupus. At the time of sampling, these women were either asymptomatic (Asym), had minor rheumatic symptoms or signs considered as an undifferentiated autoimmune syndrome (UAS), or were diagnosed with SLE or SS. Differences in microbial relative abundances among these three groups were tested assuming an ordering in clinical severity (HC<Asym/UAS<SS/SLE) and then again without the ordinal assumption. Those taxa that showed differential relative abundances were then tested for whether the effect size differed depending on the women's HLA SLE-risk allele genotype (DRB1*03:01, DRB1*15:01, DQB1*02:01 and DQB1*06:02) or anti-SSA/Ro autoantibody levels. Multiple genera within the families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae showed evidence of an HLA-by-genus interaction (P < .05). Four genera exhibited evidence of an interaction with anti-Ro52 IgA: Lachnoclostridium, Romboutsia, Bacteroides and Actinomyces (P < .01). In addition to documenting differences in microbial relative abundances across clinical severity of disease, these data provide a first-time demonstration that microbial differences are correlated with HLA SLE-risk alleles. Taken together, these data suggest that the clinical spectrum from benign to overt clinical autoimmunity may partially result from or trigger a complex interplay among specific microbial profiles, anti-Ro autoantibodies, and genetics.Entities:
Keywords: Autoantibodies; autoimmunity; human; microbiome
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35704681 PMCID: PMC9225419 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2081474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Microbes ISSN: 1949-0976
Demographic, clinical and serological characteristics of anti-Ro positive mothers at time of stool sample
| Controls (N = 23) | Asym/UAS (N = 43) | SLE/SS (N = 82) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 32.9 ± 10.9 | 38.0 ± 8.0 | 46.2 ± 11.3 |
| Self-reported Race (%) | |||
| White | 43 | 77 | 85 |
| Black | 35 | 9 | 5 |
| Asian | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| Multiethnic | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Not Reported | 13 | 0 | 5 |
| Self-reported Ethnicity (%) | |||
| Hispanic | 22 | 5 | 4 |
| Non-Hispanic | 78 | 95 | 91 |
| Current Medications (%) | |||
| None | 100 | 70 | 30 |
| Anti-malarials only | 0 | 23 | 27 |
| Anti-malarials + NSAIDS | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Anti-malarials + steroids | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Anti-malarials + steroids + NSAIDS | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Anti-malarials + immunosuppressants | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Anti-malarials + steroids + immunosuppressants | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Steroids only | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Steroids + immunosuppressants | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Medications not known | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Alpha diversity in healthy controls and anti-Ro positive mothers
| Taxonomic Level | Healthy Controls (N = 23) H (eH) | Asym/UAS*(N = 43) H (eH) | SS/SLE (N = 82) H (eH) | P-value1 Healthy Controls vs. All RRNL | P-value2 Healthy Controls vs. Asym/UAS vs. SS/SLE | P-value1 Asym/UAS vs. SS/SLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | 0.68 ± 0.25(1.98) | 0.80 ± 0.21(2.22) | 0.76 ± 0.22(2.14) | 0.0195 | 0.065 | 0.9466 |
| Class | 1.11 ± 0.30(3.02) | 1.05 ± 0.22(2.86) | 1.06 ± 0.24(2.89) | 0.4127 | 0.477 | 0.334 |
| Order | 1.11 ± 0.31(3.05) | 1.06 ± 0.22(2.88) | 1.07 ± 0.24(2.92) | 0.3832 | 0.4601 | 0.3404 |
| Family | 1.74 ± 0.31(5.70) | 1.80 ± 0.24(6.03) | 1.69 ± 0.29(5.44) | 0.991 | 0.3422 | 0.1414 |
| Genus | 2.77 ± 0.36(16.02) | 2.74 ± 0.44(15.51) | 2.62 ± 0.53(13.76) | 0.1975 | 0.0593 | 0.0381 |
| Species | 2.50 ± 0.52(12.17) | 2.53 ± 0.43(12.49) | 2.36 ± 0.43(10.56) | 0.1457 | 0.0045 | 0.0029 |
Results reported: mean ± standard deviation of the Shannon entropy-based diversity index (H) and the corresponding effective number of elements eH.
*Asym/UAS represents asymptomatic and undifferentiated autoimmune syndrome (UAS) anti-Ro positive mothers of children with CHB.
1P-value for two group comparison using a t-test.
2P-value for three group using analysis of variance with ordinal alternative reflecting clinical severity.
Figure 1.Experimental approach to evaluating gut dysbiosis and the autoimmune clinical spectrum in anti-Ro positive mothers of children with neonatal lupus. Panel A. Focusing on anti-Ro positive mothers of children with neonatal lupus who reside at preclinical autoimmunity, the initial goal was to identify associated genera using a three-group contrast to test for differences across healthy controls, Asymptomatic/Undifferentiated Autoimmune Syndrome, and Sjögren’s Syndrome/Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, assuming an ordering in clinical severity (HC
All genera meeting FDR Significance for an ordinal test of differential CLR-transformed relative abundances between healthy controls, Asym/UAS, and SS/SLE groups
| Family | Genus | Healthy Controls | Asym/UAS | SS/SLE | 3 Group Ordinal1 | 3 Group Ordinal1 FDR | Control vs. anti-Ro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0011 ± 0.0021 | 0.0006 ± 0.0011 | 0.0006 ± 0.0009 | 1.62E-03 | 2.66E-02 | 1.26E-03 | ||
| 0.0682 ± 0.0968 | 0.1976 ± 0.1600 | 0.2265 ± 0.2169 | 7.38E-07 | 9.37E-05 | 4.03E-09 | ||
| 0.0997 ± 0.0998 | 0.0261 ± 0.0559 | 0.0335 ± 0.0596 | 1.20E-05 | 7.64E-04 | 7.99E-10 | ||
| 0.134 ± 0.0593 | 0.0773 ± 0.0824 | 0.1064 ± 0.1083 | 6.55E-04 | 2.08E-02 | 7.73E-08 | ||
| 0.0034 ± 0.0036 | 0.0029 ± 0.0044 | 0.0023 ± 0.0034 | 1.47E-03 | 2.66E-02 | 1.16E-02 | ||
| 0.0107 ± 0.0099 | 0.0074 ± 0.0163 | 0.0064 ± 0.0101 | 3.91E-03 | 4.13E-02 | 3.85E-03 | ||
| 0.0058 ± 0.0072 | 0.0113 ± 0.0171 | 0.0198 ± 0.0284 | 9.12E-05 | 3.86E-03 | 9.34E-04 | ||
| 0.0247 ± 0.0444 | 0.0233 ± 0.0446 | 0.017 ± 0.037 | 1.67E-03 | 2.66E-02 | 2.12E-03 | ||
| 0.0007 ± 0.0011 | 0.0019 ± 0.0032 | 0.0036 ± 0.0066 | 1.20E-03 | 2.66E-02 | 3.33E-03 | ||
| 0.0004 ± 0.0011 | 0.0012 ± 0.0019 | 0.0015 ± 0.0019 | 3.62E-03 | 4.13E-02 | 1.42E-03 | ||
| 0.001 ± 0.0026 | 0.0036 ± 0.0042 | 0.0043 ± 0.0073 | 3.19E-03 | 4.05E-02 | 3.19E-06 | ||
| 0 ± 0 | 0.0005 ± 0.0013 | 0.0006 ± 0.0018 | 2.30E-03 | 3.25E-02 | 2.38E-03 | ||
| 0.0012 ± 0.0015 | 0.0014 ± 0.0013 | 0.0029 ± 0.0035 | 4.42E-03 | 4.31E-02 | 3.04E-02 |
1An ordinal, three-group contrast within a GLM was used to test for differences across healthy controls, Asym/UAS, and SS/SLE, assuming an ordering in clinical severity (HC
Significant HLA x genus interactions for genera that met FDR-adjusted significance in the differential abundance analysis
| HLA Allele | Family | Genus | Interaction P-value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Overall Mean Abundance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRB1*03:01 | 0.026 | 1.66 (1.06–2.58) | 0.001463 | ||
| DRB1*15:01 | 0.004 | 0.48 (0.29–0.79) | 0.001095 | ||
| DRB1*15:01 | 0.033 | 0.60 (0.37–0.96) | 0.004236 | ||
| DRB1*15:01 | 0.044 | 0.63 (0.40–0.99) | 0.001463 | ||
| DQB1*02:01 | 0.020 | 1.85 (1.10–3.11) | 0.002591 | ||
| DQB1*02:01 | 0.033 | 1.58 (1.04–2.41) | 0.001463 | ||
| DQB1*06:02 | 0.006 | 0.52 (0.33–0.83) | 0.001095 | ||
| DQB1*06:02 | 0.011 | 0.57 (0.36–0.88) | 0.004236 | ||
| DQB1*06:02 | 0.022 | 0.60 (0.39–0.93) | 0.001463 | ||
| DQB1*06:02 | 0.034 | 0.65 (0.44–0.97) | 0.012772 | ||
| DQB1*06:02 | 0.047 | 0.61 (0.38–0.99) | 0.001864 |
Figure 2.Taxon-by-disease interaction plot for anti-Ro52 IgA autoantibody levels. The y-axis shows anti-Ro52 IgA level, and the x-axis reflects the relative abundance of the particular taxon. The curve within each plot represents the general linear model’s predicted value as a function of the taxon’s relative abundance separately for women diagnosed with Asym/UAS (green) and with SS/SLE (purple).
Stool taxa meeting statistical significance (FDR-adjusted P-value < 0.05) using the Taxonomic Stepdown (TSD) Method*
| | Ordinal Test | P-values for pairwise comparisons | Relative abundance: Mean ± (Standard deviation) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Genus Species | TSDPFDR | Asym/UAS vs. SS/SLE | Healthy Control vs. Asym/UAS | Healthy Control vs. SS/SLE | Healthy Controls | Asym/UAS | SS/SLE |
| 1.17E-05 | 0.4555 | 8.34E-09 | 1.09E-08 | 0.0937 ± 0.0943 | 0.0233 ± 0.0494 | 0.0308 ± 0.0545 | |
| 4.00E-05 | 0.4506 | 8.20E-09 | 1.11E-08 | 0.0997 ± 0.0998 | 0.0261 ± 0.0559 | 0.0335 ± 0.0596 | |
| 1.68E-03 | 0.4469 | 0.0086 | 0.0006 | 0.0010 ± 0.0020 | 0.0005 ± 0.0010 | 0.0005 ± 0.0008 | |
| 3.24E-03 | 0.4251 | 0.0094 | 0.0006 | 0.0011 ± 0.0021 | 0.0006 ± 0.0011 | 0.0006 ± 0.0009 | |
| 5.00E-03 | 0.5490 | 0.0050 | 0.0005 | 0.0026 ± 0.0047 | 0.0016 ± 0.0035 | 0.0014 ± 0.0025 | |
| 7.00E-06 | 0.6853 | 2.45E-07 | 5.12E-09 | 0.0641 ± 0.0932 | 0.1862 ± 0.1554 | 0.2149 ± 0.2102 | |
| 7.38E-07 | 0.6853 | 2.45E-07 | 5.12E-09 | 0.0682 ± 0.0968 | 0.1976 ± 0.1600 | 0.2265 ± 0.2169 | |
| 4.34E-03 | 0.4218 | 6.16E-07 | 1.38E-06 | 0.0269 ± 0.0388 | 0.1335 ± 0.1343 | 0.1356 ± 0.1723 | |
*TSD method started at phylum level. Means and standard deviations presented in the table are not CLR-transformed.