OBJECTIVE: Maternal anti-Ro autoantibodies are associated with cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus (cardiac NL), yet only 2% of women with this reactivity have an affected child. Identification of a more specific marker would channel intense monitoring to fetuses at greater risk. This study aimed to determine whether autoantibodies against Ro 52 amino acids 200-239 (p200) confer added risk over autoantibodies to full-length Ro 52, Ro 60, or La. METHODS: Anti-Ro-exposed pregnancies resulting in cardiac NL or no cardiac manifestations were identified from the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus and the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation study. Umbilical cord (n = 123) and maternal (n = 115) samples were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The frequencies of p200, Ro 52, Ro 60, and La autoantibodies were not significantly different between affected and unaffected children. However, neonatal anti-Ro 52 and Ro 60 titers were highest in cardiac NL and their unaffected siblings compared to unaffected neonates without a cardiac NL sibling. Although both maternal anti-Ro 52 and p200 autoantibodies were less than 50% specific for cardiac NL, anti-p200 was the least likely of the Ro autoantibodies to be false-positive in mothers who have never had an affected child. Titers of anti-Ro 52 and p200 did not differ during a cardiac NL or unaffected pregnancy from the same mother. CONCLUSION: Maternal reactivity to p200 does not confer an added risk to fetal conduction defects over full-length Ro 52 or Ro 60 autoantibodies. Mothers who may never be at risk for having an affected child have lower anti-Ro 60 titers and may require less stringent echocardiographic monitoring compared to women with high-titer autoantibodies.
OBJECTIVE: Maternal anti-Ro autoantibodies are associated with cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus (cardiac NL), yet only 2% of women with this reactivity have an affected child. Identification of a more specific marker would channel intense monitoring to fetuses at greater risk. This study aimed to determine whether autoantibodies against Ro 52 amino acids 200-239 (p200) confer added risk over autoantibodies to full-length Ro 52, Ro 60, or La. METHODS: Anti-Ro-exposed pregnancies resulting in cardiac NL or no cardiac manifestations were identified from the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus and the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation study. Umbilical cord (n = 123) and maternal (n = 115) samples were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The frequencies of p200, Ro 52, Ro 60, and La autoantibodies were not significantly different between affected and unaffected children. However, neonatal anti-Ro 52 and Ro 60 titers were highest in cardiac NL and their unaffected siblings compared to unaffected neonates without a cardiac NL sibling. Although both maternal anti-Ro 52 and p200 autoantibodies were less than 50% specific for cardiac NL, anti-p200 was the least likely of the Ro autoantibodies to be false-positive in mothers who have never had an affected child. Titers of anti-Ro 52 and p200 did not differ during a cardiac NL or unaffected pregnancy from the same mother. CONCLUSION: Maternal reactivity to p200 does not confer an added risk to fetal conduction defects over full-length Ro 52 or Ro 60 autoantibodies. Mothers who may never be at risk for having an affected child have lower anti-Ro 60 titers and may require less stringent echocardiographic monitoring compared to women with high-titer autoantibodies.
Authors: Peter M Izmirly; Amit Saxena; Mimi Y Kim; Dan Wang; Sara K Sahl; Carolina Llanos; Deborah Friedman; Jill P Buyon Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Boutjdir; L Chen; Z H Zhang; C E Tseng; F DiDonato; W Rashbaum; A Morris; N el-Sherif; J P Buyon Journal: Circ Res Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Aurélie Ambrosi; Vijole Dzikaite; Jeongsook Park; Linn Strandberg; Vijay K Kuchroo; Eric Herlenius; Marie Wahren-Herlenius Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J P Buyon; R Hiebert; J Copel; J Craft; D Friedman; M Katholi; L A Lee; T T Provost; M Reichlin; L Rider; A Rupel; S Saleeb; W L Weston; M L Skovron Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert M Clancy; Chelsea B Backer; Xiaoming Yin; Raj P Kapur; Yair Molad; Jill P Buyon Journal: J Immunol Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: J P Buyon; E Ben-Chetrit; S Karp; R A Roubey; L Pompeo; W H Reeves; E M Tan; R Winchester Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1989-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Pilar Brito-Zerón; Peter M Izmirly; Manuel Ramos-Casals; Jill P Buyon; Munther A Khamashta Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Joanne H Reed; Miroslaw K Gorny; Liuzhe Li; Timothy Cardozo; Jill P Buyon; Robert M Clancy Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2017-01-22 Impact factor: 7.094
Authors: A Hoxha; A Ruffatti; A Ambrosi; V Ottosson; M Hedlund; L Ottosson; M Anandapadamanaban; M Sunnerhagen; S-E Sonesson; M Wahren-Herlenius Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Caroline Grönwall; Robert M Clancy; Lelise Getu; Katy A Lloyd; Don L Siegel; Joanne H Reed; Jill P Buyon; Gregg J Silverman Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 7.094
Authors: R M Clancy; M C Marion; H C Ainsworth; M J Blaser; M Chang; T D Howard; P M Izmirly; C Lacher; M Masson; K Robins; J P Buyon; C D Langefeld Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 7.094
Authors: Sara De Carolis; Cristina Garufi; Ester Garufi; Maria Pia De Carolis; Angela Botta; Sara Tabacco; Silvia Salvi Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 3.418