| Literature DB >> 35702527 |
Shanshan Li1, Shaoda Hu2, Sanyuan Shi3, Lu Ren3, Wei Yan1, Huabing Zhao3.
Abstract
The activated sludge process can effectively remove polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from wastewater via biodegradation. However, the degradable microorganisms and functional enzymes involved in this process remain unclear. In this study, we successfully employed a laboratory-scale sequential batch reactor to investigate variations in microbial community and protein expression in response to the addition of different PAHs and process time. The analysis of bacterial community structure by 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene indicated that bacteria from Burkholderiales order were dominant in PAHs treated sludge. Mass spectrometry performed with 2D protein profiles of all sludge samples demonstrated that most proteins exhibiting differential expression profiles during the process were derived from Burkholderiales populations; these proteins are involved in DNA replication, fatty acid and glucose metabolism, stress response, protein synthesis, and aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism. Nevertheless, the protein expression profiles indicated that naphthalene, but not anthracene, can induce the expression of PAH-degrading proteins and accelerate its elimination from sludge. Though only naphthalene and anthracene were added into our experimental groups, the differentially expressed enzymes involved in other PAHs (especially biphenyl) metabolism were also detected. This study provides apparent evidence linking the metabolic activities of Burkholderiales populations with the degradation of PAHs in activated sludge processes. Overall, our findings highlighted the successful application of metaproteomics integrated with microbial diversity analysis by high-throughput sequencing technique on the analysis of environmental samples, which could provide a convenience to monitor the changes in proteins expression profiles and their correlation with microbial diversity. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35702527 PMCID: PMC9116109 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04674g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Classification of experiment groups in this studya
| Time point | 30 days | 90 days | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | C-30 | TN-30 | TA-30 | TC-30 | C-90 | TN-90 | TA-90 | TC-90 |
| PAHs addition | None | Naphthalene | Anthracene | Naphthalene + anthracene | None | Naphthalene | Anthracene | Naphthalene + anthracene |
| NAPinf (mg L−1) | 0 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 25 |
| ANTinf (mg L−1) | 0 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 25 |
NAPinf: influent naphthalene concentration; ANTinf: influent anthracene concentration.
Summary of biosolids samples from different experimental groupsa,b
| Parameter | C-30 | TN-30 | TA-30 | TC-30 | C-90 | TN-90 | TA-90 | TC-90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLSS (g L−1) | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| NAPeff (mg L−1) | — | 23.5 ± 0.5 | — | 18.8 ± 0.7 | — | 5.4 ± 0.2 | — | 15.5 ± 0.4 |
| NAPsludge (mg L−1) | — | 38.6 ± 1.5 | — | 25.8 ± 1.0 | — | 23.4 ± 0.7 | — | 12.3 ± 0.2 |
|
| — | 53.0 ± 0.8 | — | 24.8 ± 0.2 | — | 89.2 ± 1.9 | — | 38.2 ± 1.0 |
|
| — | 50.4 ± 0.5 | — | 21.4 ± 0.6 | — | 88.7 ± 1.4 | — | 37.4 ± 0.9 |
| ANTeff (mg L−1) | — | — | 40.3 ± 1.2 | 20.7 ± 1.0 | — | — | 32.2 ± 0.8 | 18.6 ± 1.1 |
| ANTsludge (mg L−1) | — | — | 45.3 ± 2.1 | 34.9 ± 0.8 | — | — | 62.8 ± 1.6 | 52.4 ± 1.7 |
|
| — | — | 19.4 ± 0.8 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | — | — | 35.6 ± 0.5 | 25.4 ± 0.9 |
|
| — | — | 16.4 ± 0.3 | 12.5 ± 0.2 | — | — | 34.2 ± 0.6 | 23.3 ± 0.6 |
NAPeff: average effluent naphthalene concentration; ANTeff: average effluent anthracene concentration; NAPsludge: naphthalene in sludge; ANTsludge: anthracene in sludge; ENAP: naphthalene removal efficiency; EANT: anthracene removal efficiency; E-BIONAP: biodegradation efficiency of naphthalene; E-BIOANT: biodegradation efficiency of anthracene.
n = 3, mean ± SD.
Alpha diversity indices of all the sludge samples
| Sample ID | Clean reads | OTU number | ACE | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-30 | 21 260 | 505 | 550.55 | 561.72 | 3.54 | 0.13 |
| TN-30 | 25 719 | 576 | 607.96 | 611.66 | 3.95 | 0.05 |
| TA-30 | 58 652 | 604 | 618.92 | 631.77 | 3.88 | 0.06 |
| TC-30 | 63 134 | 627 | 637.75 | 647.31 | 4.09 | 0.04 |
| C-90 | 55 060 | 471 | 516.87 | 520.58 | 3.61 | 0.10 |
| TN-90 | 63 991 | 562 | 607.85 | 615.20 | 3.83 | 0.07 |
| TA-90 | 21 887 | 454 | 524.84 | 521.91 | 3.74 | 0.04 |
| TC-90 | 55 566 | 513 | 566.00 | 587.17 | 3.60 | 0.11 |
Fig. 1Relative abundance of the dominant bacteria at order level in the sludge samples. C: control group without PAHs addition; TN: naphthalene addition in the influent; TA: anthracene addition in the influent; TC: naphthalene and anthracene addition in the influent. 30: sampling at 30 d; 90: sampling at 90 d.
Fig. 2Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of sludge microbial community. Blue point denote the samples cultured for 30 day, red point denote the samples cultured for 90 day.
Classification and quantity of the identified proteins in the different groupsa
| Group | Total number of proteins detected | Proteins with typical functions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate metabolism | Protein synthesis | Lipid metabolism | PAH metabolism | ||
| C-30 | 122 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 10 |
| TN-30 | 129 | 14 | 20 | 2 | 11 |
| TA-30 | 157 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 9 |
| TC-30 | 163 | 13 | 15 | 2 | 10 |
| C-90 | 135 | 11 | 16 | 2 | 9 |
| TN-90 | 141 | 15 | 16 | 2 | 13 |
| TA-90 | 63 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 6 |
| TC-90 | 83 | 9 | 13 | 1 | 7 |
The results were the average value of triplicate tests.
Fig. 32D PAGE profiles of proteins extracted from the experimental groups. Potential protein molecular mass ranges are indicated on the left and isoelectric point ranges are provided on the top of the gel images.
Differentially expressed proteins and putative function from different treatment groups at various time points
| Function | Description | Accession number | Assigned order | Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN-30 | TA-30 | TC-30 | TN-90 | TA-90 | TC-90 | ||||
| Protein synthesis | Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) | A2SLF9 | Burkholderiales | 1.16 | 1.50 | 1.88 | 1.15 | −1.22 | — |
| Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) | Q46WC7 | Burkholderiales | 1.42 | 1.63 | 1.84 | 1.35 | — | — | |
| Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) | B3EU83 | Bacteroidetes | — | — | — | 1.11 | — | — | |
| Diaminopimelate epimerase (DapF) | Q0S1N7 | Actinomycetales | — | — | — | 3.14 | 1.05 | −1.10 | |
| Chorismate synthase (CS) | Q3MFM3 | Nostocales | — | — | — | 1.59 | — | −1.81 | |
| ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease (FtsH) | C5CES8 | Asterales | 1.06 | 1.53 | 1.34 | 1.34 | — | — | |
| Alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) | A8YTJ0 | Actinomycetales | — | — | — | 1.24 | — | — | |
| 50S ribosomal protein | P0A5W1 | Actinomycetales | 1.56 | 1.68 | 1.20 | −1.70 | −3.29 | −1.43 | |
| DNA replication | Chromosomal replication initiator protein (DnaA) | A6W3V4 | Actinomycetales | — | — | — | 1.84 | — | −2.03 |
| Energy metabolism | ATP synthase subunit beta | A1TJ41 | Burkholderiales | — | — | — | −1.75 | −3.40 | −1.12 |
| ATP synthase subunit alpha | A7HIX9 | Myxococcales | 1.41 | 1.18 | 2.21 | −1.16 | — | −1.05 | |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | Isocitrate dehydrogenase kinase/phosphatase (IDH kinase) | Q8Y2Q7 | Burkholderiales | — | — | — | −1.30 | — | — |
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | P54226 | Actinomycetales | — | — | — | −1.53 | −7.81 | −3.52 | |
| Enolase | C5CSV6 | Burkholderiales | −1.84 | 1.05 | 1.26 | ||||
| 2-Dehydro-3-deoxyphosphooctonate aldolase (KDO 8-P synthase) | A1K7F7 | Rhodocyclales | — | — | — | −1.05 | — | −1.24 | |
| Stress response | Chaperone protein DnaK | A0L4Z2 | Magnetococcales | — | — | — | −1.16 | — | — |
| 60 kDa chaperonin (GroEL) | A2SCV1 | Burkholderiales | 1.68 | 1.87 | 1.43 | — | — | — | |
| PAH metabolism | Naphthalene 1,2-dioxygenase subunit alpha (NahA3) | P0A110 | Pseudomonadales | — | — | — | 9.12 | — | — |
| 2-Dihydroxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene dehydrogenase (NagB) | O52384 | Burkholderiales | — | — | — | 8.43 | — | — | |
| Biphenyl 2,3-dioxygenase (BphA1) | Q52438 | Pseudomonadales | 3.08 | 2.93 | 3.35 | 4.22 | −1.12 | −1.17 | |
| 2-Hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate hydrolase (BphD) | Q2VLB9 | Burkholderiales | 3.21 | 1.59 | 1.78 | 1.26 | — | −2.85 | |
| 4-Hydroxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase 1 (BphF) | Q9S152 | Burkholderiales | 1.60 | 1.74 | 1.25 | 1.40 | — | −1.10 | |
| 4-Hydroxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase 1 (BphF) | P51018 | Pseudomonadales | 1.60 | 1.74 | 1.25 | 1.40 | — | −1.10 | |
| Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (BphG) | Q2VLC6 | Burkholderiales | 1.77 | 1.66 | 1.52 | 1.38 | −4.28 | −1.13 | |
Fig. 4Proposed metabolic pathway for the degradation of naphthalene and anthracene in the activated sludge. Red squares denote the enzyme-encoding genes found to exhibit differential expression profile in the stress of naphthalene and anthracene.