| Literature DB >> 35702306 |
Mustafa A M Alsharafani1, Taghreed Abdullah1, Zahraa A Jabur1, Abdulwahed Ahmed Hassan2,3, Abeer S Alhendi4, Amir Abdulmawjood3,5, Izhar U H Khan3.
Abstract
Commercial vegetable and fruit juices with probiotics are new functional type of beverages; however, limitations including persistence and impact of probiotic bacteria on palatability and shelf life may prevent their industrial development. This study evaluated the effect of antioxidant compounds (ascorbic acid, astaxanthin, and ginseng) on viability and persistence of Bifidobacterium spp. in Jerusalem Artichoke (JA) juice; and determine the impact of these antioxidants on the sensory (color, texture, flavor, acidity) properties, free reducing sugar (inulin and fructose), and shelf life in the fortified JA juice. Overall, the JA juice fortified with ascorbic acid showed a significant impact on the rate of persistence of two targeted bifidobacterial strains from 1 to 28 days at 5°C. Both strains produced slight acidity in ascorbic acid fortified JA juice as compared to other tested samples. Similarly, the JA juice fortified with ascorbic acid showed a significantly high increase in the total number of bifidobacterial cells of both species, enhanced palatability, and shelf life as compared to astaxanthin and ginseng extract. The quadratic model indicated a strong association between ascorbic acid, ginseng extract, and astaxanthin with a bifidobacterial cell concentration in the fortified JA juices. The Box-Behnken design was considered a feasible analysis for describing fortified JA juice and the rate of viability and persistence of bifidobacteria during 28 days of storage at 5°C in all trials. In conclusion, JA juice fortified with ascorbic acid showed a significant impact on improving the cell viability and persistence of probiotic bacteria, enhanced palatability, and shelf life as compared to other compounds tested.Entities:
Keywords: Bifidobacterium spp.; Jerusalem Artichoke juice; antioxidants; inulin; shelf life; viability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35702306 PMCID: PMC9179157 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 3.553
Box–Behnken design (BBD) data of fortified JA juices for three variables of the independent factors with experimental values of each Bifidobacterium breve M4A (Y 1) and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1 (Y 2) strain for, a dependent factor, response during 4‐week storage at 5°C
| Run | Factor 1 = | Factor 2 = | Factor 3 = | Response | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.318 | 8.017 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.428 | 8.157 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 7.791 | 8.167 |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 6.862 | 6.826 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 7.631 | 7.733 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 6.842 | 7.821 |
| 7 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 7.623 | 7.977 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.268 | 8.069 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.257 | 8.007 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.318 | 8.021 |
| 11 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 7.245 | 7.345 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 7.417 | 7.341 |
| 13 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 7.311 | 7.411 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.268 | 8.021 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8.518 | 8.249 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.247 | 8.047 |
| 17 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 7.953 | 7.676 |
FIGURE 1Data showing total sugar, free sugar (fructose), and inulin contents in individual and combination of fortified JA juice samples after 12 h of fermentation at 37°C and stored at 5°C for 4 weeks
FIGURE 2pH values of JA juice and supplemented juice incubated at 37°C for 18 h and 4‐week storage at 5°C; (a) Bifidobacterium breve M4A, (b) Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1
ANOVA‐based data results for the response surface quadratic model for Bifidobacterium breve M4A and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1 strains
| Source |
| Sum of squares | Mean square |
|
| Statistical value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Model | 11 | 4.83 | 2.35 | 0.4393 | 0.2133 | 308.55 | 344.34 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | Significant |
|
| 1 | 0.3522 | 0.8400 | 0.3522 | 0.8400 | 247.40 | 1356.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 0.0755 | 0.0008 | 0.0755 | 0.0008 | 53.00 | 1.32 | 0.0008 | 0.3019 | |
|
| 1 | 0.0219 | 0.0827 | 0.0219 | 0.0827 | 15.38 | 133.44 | 0.0112 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 0.1636 | 0.0000 | 0.1636 | 0.0000 | 114.92 | 0.0791 | 0.0001 | 0.7898 | |
|
| 1 | 0.3764 | 0.0062 | 0.3764 | 0.0062 | 264.35 | 9.95 | <0.0001 | 0.0253 | |
|
| 1 | 0.2285 | 0.0002 | 0.2285 | 0.0002 | 160.48 | 0.2942 | <0.0001 | 0.6108 | |
|
| 1 | 1.15 | 0.3231 | 1.15 | 0.3231 | 809.37 | 521.56 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 0.0069 | 0.0001 | 0.0069 | 0.0001 | 4.83 | 0.2056 | 0.0794 | 0.6692 | |
|
| 1 | 0.5997 | 0.1383 | 0.5997 | 0.1383 | 421.21 | 223.31 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1 | 0.4182 | 0.0240 | 0.4182 | 0.0240 | 293.69 | 38.71 | <0.0001 | 0.0016 | |
|
| 1 | 0.0171 | 0.0048 | 0.0171 | 0.0048 | 12.02 | 7.67 | 0.0179 | 0.0394 | |
| Residual | 5 | 0.0071 | 0.0031 | 0.0014 | 0.0006 | |||||
| Lack of fit | 1 | 0.0029 | 0.0011 | 0.0029 | 0.0011 | 2.79 | 2.15 | 0.1701 | 0.2169 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 4 | 0.0042 | 0.0020 | 0.0010 | 0.0005 | |||||
| Cor total | 16 | 4.84 | 2.35 | |||||||
| Std. dev. | 0.0377 | 0.0249 | ||||||||
| Mean | 7.84 | 7.82 | ||||||||
| C.V. % | 0.4812 | 0.3184 | ||||||||
|
| .9985 | .9987 | ||||||||
| Adjusted | .9953 | .9958 | ||||||||
| Predicted | .9943 | .9741 | ||||||||
| Adeq. precision | 52.8671 | 68.0525 | ||||||||
Sensory data analysis of Jerusalem Artichoke juice fortified with ascorbic acid (X 1), astaxanthin (X 2), and ginseng extract (X 3) after 4‐week storage at 5°C
| Strain | Code of treated sample | Sensory criterion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Texture | Flavor | Overall acceptance | Notes | ||
|
| Control | 2.55 ± 0.52a | 2.77 ± 0.65a | 2.33 ± 0.50a | 2.88 ± 0.60a | Satisfactory |
|
| 2.66 ± 0.50a | 2.88 ± 0.60a | 3.44 ± 0.52a | 3.33 ± 0.50a | Good | |
|
| 3.55 ± 0.53b | 2.89 ± 0.60a | 2.66 ± 0.50ab | 2.78 ± 0.44ab | Satisfactory | |
|
| 3.11 ± 0.60ab | 2.78 ± 0.44a | 3.22 ± 0.65b | 2.89 ± 0.33ab | Satisfactory | |
|
| 3.00 ± 0.50ab | 2.78 ± 0.44a | 3.22 ± 0.44b | 3.10 ± 0.33ab | Good | |
|
| 3.00 ± 0.50ab | 2.89 ± 0.33a | 3.22 ± 0.44b | 3.22 ± 0.44ab | Good | |
|
| 3.55 ± 0.52b | 2.77 ± 0.66a | 3.00 ± 0.50a | 3.11 ± 0.33ab | Good | |
|
| 3.22 ± 0.65ab | 3.22 ± 0.44a | 3.44 ± 0.52b | 3.22 ± 0.44b | Good | |
|
| Control | 2.66 ± 0.50 a | 2.89 ± 0.78a | 2.22 ± 0.44a | 2.89 ± 0.60a | Satisfactory |
|
| 2.77 ± 0.44a | 3.00 ± 0.71a | 3.44 ± 0.53c | 3.33 ± 0.50a | Good | |
|
| 3.55 ± 0.52b | 2.89 ± 0.33a | 2.66 ± 0.50ab | 2.77 ± 0.44a | Satisfactory | |
|
| 3.00 ± 0.50ab | 2.88 ± 0.60a | 3.22 ± 0.66bc | 3.00 ± 0.50a | Good | |
|
| 2.77 ± 0.44a | 2.78 ± 0.44a | 3.22 ± 0.44bc | 3.00 ± 0.50a | Good | |
|
| 3.11 ± 0.60ab | 2.89 ± 0.33a | 3.33 ± 0.50bc | 3.11 ± 0.33a | Good | |
|
| 3.44 ± 0.53b | 3.00 ± 0.50a | 3.00 ± 0.50bc | 3.00 ± 0.50ab | Good | |
|
| 3.33 ± 0.50ab | 3.22 ± 0.44a | 3.55 ± 0.57a | 3.33 ± 0.50a | Good | |
a,b,cdifferent letters indicate significant differences (p < .05). Sensory scale: 4.1–5.0 = very good; 3.1–4.0 = good; 2.1–3.0 = satisfactory; 1.1–2.0 = sufficient; 0.0–1.0 = not acceptable.
FIGURE 3Diagnostic plot for developed model adequacy in actual response vs. predicted response for Bifidobacterium breve M4A (a) and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1 (b) strains. The internally studentized residual vs. predicted strain numbers of the B. breve M4A (c) and B. longum subsp. longum FA1 (d)
FIGURE 4Response surface design of Log number of cells (CFU/ml) for Bifidobacterium breve M4A (models a–c) and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1 (models e–f). Where X 1 X 2 represented in models a & b; X 1 X 3 illustrated in models b & e and X 2 X 3 illustrated in models c & f. However, the third variable of each graph was kept constant at the central point
FIGURE 5Models a & b represent two‐dimensional contour plot of factors X 1 vs. X 2 without adding prediction power effect of X 3, a mid‐level slice (0 level) of the coded level third factor of Bifidobacterium breve M4A and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum FA1 strains. Models c & d represent the graph indicating currently shown surface hot of the third‐factor effect of X 3 at a higher coded level (+1) on the contour plot of B. breve M4A and B. longum subsp. longum FA1 strains