Literature DB >> 35701833

Antitumoral RNA-targeted oligonucleotide therapeutics: The third pillar after small molecule inhibitors and antibodies.

Hiroaki Taniguchi1,2, Yasunori Suzuki1, Kohzoh Imai3, Yasushi Adachi4.   

Abstract

Oligonucleotide therapeutics, drugs consisting of 10-50 nucleotide-long single- or double-stranded DNA or RNA molecules that can bind to specific DNA or RNA sequences or proteins, include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), aptamers, and decoys. These oligonucleotide therapeutics could potentially become the third pillar of drug development. In particular, ASOs and siRNAs are advanced tools that are widely used to silence gene expression. They are used in clinical trials, as they have high specificity for target mRNAs and non-coding RNAs and limited toxicity. However, their clinical application remains challenging. Although chemotherapy has benefits, it has severe adverse effects in many patients. Therefore, new modalities for targeted molecular therapy against tumors, including oligonucleotide therapeutics, are required, and they should be compatible with diagnosis using next-generation sequencing. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic uses of ASOs, siRNAs, and miRNAs in clinical studies on malignant tumors. Understanding previous research and development will help in developing novel oligonucleotide therapeutics against malignant tumors.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antisense oligonucleotide; drug delivery; microRNA; oligonucleotide therapeutics; small interfering RNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35701833      PMCID: PMC9459246          DOI: 10.1111/cas.15461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.518


antisense oligonucleotide argonaute 2 drug delivery system hepatocellular carcinoma lipid nanoparticle microRNA non‐small cell lung cancer pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma poly (lactic‐co‐glycolic) acid RNA‐induced silencing complex splice switching oligonucleotide vascular endothelial growth factor stable nucleic acid lipid particle

INTRODUCTION

Oligonucleotide therapy involves the use of drugs consisting of single‐stranded DNA or RNA that can bind to specific sequences of DNA, RNA, or protein and inhibit gene expression or intercept protein functions. Oligonucleotide therapeutics include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), aptamers, and decoys. Antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs are widely used advanced tools to silence gene expression because of their high specificity and limited toxicity. Oligonucleotides are even suitable for targets that are not druggable via other therapeutic modalities; thus, oligonucleotide therapeutics have the potential to become the third pillar of drug development. The advantages of oligonucleotide therapeutics include the simple design of the drug constructs based only on the genomic sequences of target genes, and they require less time for development. However, their applications in clinical studies are limited because of the off‐target effects of ASO and siRNA sequences and poor stability due to the degradation by ribonucleases when injected systemically. They also activate the innate immune system via Toll‐like receptors. ASO–mRNA interactions depending on mRNA structure, thermodynamic stability, and hybridization site position have been well understood; however, design methods of ASO sequence have not been established. Design methods for the siRNA sequence are important to reduce potential off‐target effects in siRNA, and the homology of the seed region of siRNA should be minimized to the 3' UTR of non‐target mRNA. Chemical modifications, such as the introduction of phosphorothioate backbones and sugar‐modified nucleic acids, including 2‐O‐methyl, 2‐O‐methoxyethyl, 2‐flouro, locked nucleic acid (LNA), and bridged nucleic acids (BNA), increase not only resistance to nuclease degradation and avoid immunologic reactions but also prevent toxicity. Therapeutic oligonucleotides are filtered by the kidneys because of their small size, resulting in poor accumulation in their target sites. Furthermore, ASOs of high concentrations can penetrate the lipophilic cell membranes. However, siRNAs cannot completely diffuse across them. Drug delivery systems (DDSs) for oligonucleotides play an important role in overcoming these difficulties (Figures 1 and 2). After the penetration of ASOs and siRNAs into the cell membrane, they must escape from endosomes to reach their target RNAs in the cytosol. siRNAs are loaded onto Argonaute2 (Ago2), which is a component of RNA‐induced silencing complexes (RISCs) (Figure 2). , Although ASOs and siRNAs possess considerable therapeutic potential, complete remission cannot be achieved with only a single ASO or siRNA, as cancers and tumors are heterogeneous.
FIGURE 1

Strategies to overcome difficulties associated with oligonucleotide therapeutics

FIGURE 2

Drug delivery system (DDS) for oligonucleotide therapeutics

Strategies to overcome difficulties associated with oligonucleotide therapeutics Drug delivery system (DDS) for oligonucleotide therapeutics Herein, we focused on ASO and siRNA drugs currently used to treat malignant tumors, mainly in clinical trials. Understanding oligonucleotide therapeutics will help develop novel therapeutic strategies against tumors.

ANTITUMORAL ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES

Antisense oligonucleotides are 12–25 nucleotide‐long single‐stranded DNA molecules. They modulate the function of their RNA targets via several mechanisms, such as RNase H‐mediated degradation, mRNA modification, and miRNA inhibition. Antisense oligonucleotides are classified by their mechanisms of action into (a) gapmers, which are composed of DNA antisense with chemically modified RNA segments on both sides of the sequence, and act as substrates for RNase H (Figure 3A); (b) RNase H‐independent splice switching oligonucleotides (SSOs), which bind to pre‐mRNAs and disrupt their recognition by splicing factors ; and (c) modified ASOs, which inhibit miRNA function. The ASO drugs used to treat malignant tumors in clinical trials are as follows (Table 1).
FIGURE 3

Modes of action of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). (A) Gapmer‐type ASO binds to the target RNA and forms the RNA/DNA heteroduplex in the central gap region, and RNase H cleaves the RNA strand of the heteroduplex. (B) Effect of siRNA. siRNA is composed of two complementary strands, the passenger strand and the guide strand. The latter binds to AGO2, inducing the degradation of complementary mRNA

TABLE 1

List of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) in clinical trials

Development product nameTargetApplicationStageDevelopment company/UniversityNCT#
Ongoing clinical trials
AZD4785/IONIS‐KRAS‐2.5RxKRASAdvanced solid tumorsPhase IAstraZenecaNCT03101839
AZD5312/IONIS‐AR‐2.5RX/ARRxAndrogen receptor (AR)Cancer – prostaticPhase I/IIUniversity of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterNCT03300505 NCT02144051
BP1001/PrexigebersenGRB‐2CancerPhase I/IIBio‐Path HoldingsNCT04196257
NCT02923986
NCT02781883
NCT01159028
BP1002Bcl‐2Advanced lymphoid malignancyPhase IBio‐Path HoldingsNCT04072458
EZN‐2968/Anti‐HIF‐1a/LNA AS ODNHIF‐1aSolid tumorPhase INational Cancer Institute (NCI)NCT01120288
NCT00466583
NCT02564614
EZN‐4176AR exon 4Prostatic neoplasmPhase IEnzon PharmaceuticalsNCT01337518
G4460/C‐MYB asODNC‐MybHematological malignancyPhase IIAbramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaNCT00002592
GRN163L/Imetelstat®RNA component of telomeraseCancerPhase II/IIIGeron CorporationNCT02598661
GTI‐2040R2 component of R2CancerPhase IIAptose BiosciencesNCT00565058
NCT00068588
NCT00087165
IGV‐001/IGF‐1R/AS ODNIGF‐1RGlioblastomaPhase I Phase IIDavid Andrews, Thomas Jefferson UniversityNCT02507583
NCT01550523 NCT04485949
IONIS‐STAT3RX/AZD9150/DanvatirsenSTAT3CancerPhase I/IIIonis PharmaceuticalsNCT01563302 NCT02417753
ISIS 5132/CGP69846AC‐Raf‐1Ovarian/breast cancerPhase IIEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupNCT00003236
NCT00003892
LErafAON‐ETUC‐Raf‐1CancerPhase IINSYS TherapeuticsNCT00100672
LY900003/ISIS 3521PKC‐αCancerPhase IIIIonis PharmaceuticalsNCT00017407
NCT00034268
MRG‐106/CobomarsenmiR‐155Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma/mycosis fungoidesPhase I/IImiRagen TherapeuticsNCT02580552
NCT03713320
NCT03837457
OGX‐011/CustirsenClusterinCancerPhase IIIAchieve Life SciencesNCT01188187
NCT01578655
OGX‐427/ApatorsenHSP27CancerPhase IIBritish Columbia Cancer AgencyNCT01120470
NCT02423590
NCT01829113 NCT01780545
NCT01454089
RO7070179HIF‐1aHepatocellular carcinomaPhase IHoffmann‐La RocheNCT02564614
SPC2996Bcl‐2Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaPhase I/IISantaris Pharma A/SNCT00285103
Discontinued and terminated clinical trials
AEG35156XIAPCancerPhase IIAegera TherapeuticsNCT00363974
Multiple studies terminatedNCT00882869 NCT00558545 NCT00557596
EL625/Cenersen/Aezeaa P53Myelodysplastic syndromes/Leukemia/LymphomaPhase II, TerminatedEleosNCT00074737
G3139/Oblimersen/Genasenseb Bcl‐2Cancer/Waldenstroms MacroglobulinemiaPhase II/III, TerminatedM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNCT00030641 NCT00017602 NCT00016263 NCT00024440 NCT01200342
NCT00543205
VEGF‐AS/Veglinb VEGFMesotheliomaPhase I/II, TerminatedUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNCT00668499

Note: Termination reasons are (a) lack of funding and (b) withdrawn from business.

Modes of action of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). (A) Gapmer‐type ASO binds to the target RNA and forms the RNA/DNA heteroduplex in the central gap region, and RNase H cleaves the RNA strand of the heteroduplex. (B) Effect of siRNA. siRNA is composed of two complementary strands, the passenger strand and the guide strand. The latter binds to AGO2, inducing the degradation of complementary mRNA List of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) in clinical trials Note: Termination reasons are (a) lack of funding and (b) withdrawn from business. AZD9150 (danvatirsen) is an STAT3 ASO. In heavily pretreated patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), AZD9150 was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy. In a phase 1b trial of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, AZD9150 plus durvalumab helped achieve the primary endpoint and was well tolerated; however, its antitumor activity was limited. BP1001 is an ASO for liposomal growth factor receptor‐bound protein 2 (Grb2). In a phase 1/1b trial of patients with relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies, BP1001 exhibited antitumor activity in combination with low‐dose cytarabine. EZN‐4176 binds to the hinge region (exon 4) of androgen receptor mRNA. In a phase 1 study of patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), EZN‐4176 activity was minimal. GRN163L (imetelstat) is a telomerase inhibitor targeting the template region of functional telomerase RNA subunits. In a phase 2 study of patients with intermediate‐2 or high‐risk myelofibrosis relapsed/refractory to Janus‐associated kinase inhibitors, GRN163L improved the symptom response rate and bone marrow fibrosis. In a phase 2 trial of patients with low‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes, GRN163L resulted in a meaningful and durable transfusion independence rate. In a phase 2 study of patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), GRN163N did not improve progression‐free survival (PFS). However, there was a trend toward improvement in the median PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with short telomeres. In a phase 2 study of children with recurrent central nervous system tumors, GRN163N demonstrated intratumoral and peripheral blood mononuclear cell target inhibition, although the regimen was toxic. GTI‐2040 is an ASO of the R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). The prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response rate in a phase 2 trial of GTI‐2040 plus docetaxel/prednisone for patients with CRPC met the minimum phase 2 criteria for further enrolment. In another phase 2 trial of patients with previously treated NSCLC, the activity of GTI‐2040 plus docetaxel was not superior to that of docetaxel alone. In a phase 1 study of patients with advanced solid tumors, although GTI‐2040 plus gemcitabine showed no clear evidence of antitumor activity, several patients had prolonged stable disease (SD). IMV‐001 is an ASO against type‐1 insulin‐like growth factor receptor (IGF‐1R). Both IGF ligands and their receptor IGF‐1R are overexpressed in several tumors. IGFs stimulate the proliferation and prevent the apoptosis of cancer cells. Thus, IGF signaling is also critical in tumor dissemination in addition to carcinogensis. Previously, we reported that anti‐IGF‐1R therapies may be a potential treatment strategy for several cancers. , In a phase 1 trial of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IGV‐001, which combines autologous tumor cells and IMV‐001, was well tolerated. The PFS of patients on IGV‐001 was longer than that of patients in the standard of care arms, and the immune system was stimulated by IGV‐001. ISIS 3521 inhibits the expression of protein kinase C‐alpha (PKCα), which presents increased expression in tumor tissues and is implicated in malignant transformation, proliferation, and anti‐apoptosis. Inhibition of PKCα has been reported to arrest the growth of several tumors. ISIS 3521 has demonstrated anti‐tumor activity in a phase 2 study of patients with relapsed low‐grade NHL. ISIS 3521 plus cisplatin/gemcitabine exhibited antitumor activity in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, neither ISIS 3521 nor ISIS 5132, which inhibits the expression of PKC‐alpha and Raf‐1, showed clinically significant single‐agent antitumor activity in a phase 2 trial of patients with chemotherapy‐naive CRPC or those with untreated colorectal cancer (CRC). OGX011 (custirsen) inhibits the production of clusterin, the secretory isoform of which protects the cancer cells from apoptosis induced by cellular stress, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or androgen/estrogen depletion. Researchers have revealed that clusterin promotes cell survival via the inhibition of BAX and activation of the PI3K pathway or ERK 1/2 signaling in several cancers. Inhibition of clusterin in cancer cells induces a significant reduction in cell growth and apoptosis; additionally, it increases the effectiveness of chemo drugs via p53 activation. In a phase 3 trial of patients with metastatic CRPC, OGX011 plus cabazitaxel/prednisone provided no survival benefits. In a phase 1/2 trial of patients with untreated advanced NSCLC, 31% patients on OGX011 plus gemcitabine/platinum showed an overall response, and the 2‐year survival rate of the patients was 30%. OGX011 decreased the serum clusterin level. Patients with low clusterin levels presented longer median survival. In a phase 2 trial of patients with metastatic breast cancer, OGX011 plus docetaxel was well tolerated and clinical activity was observed, although the number of responses to meet the criteria for the next stage was insufficient. OGX‐427 (apatorsen) is an ASO for heat shock protein 27 (HSP27). In a phase 2 study of patients with CRPC, OGX‐427 plus prednisone failed to alter the proportion of patients without disease progression compared with prednisone alone but significantly decreased PSA. In another phase 2 trial of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the first‐line setting, OGX‐427 plus chemotherapy did not improve outcomes, although a trend toward prolonged PFS and OS in patients with high baseline serum HSP27 level was observed. In a phase 2 trial for patients with untreated metastatic non‐squamous NSCLC, OGX‐427 plus carboplatin/pemetrexed, although well tolerated, did not improve outcomes.

ANTITUMORAL SMALL INTERFERING RNAS

RNA interference is a conserved biological response that causes sequence‐specific gene silencing via 21‐bp dsRNAs known as siRNAs. siRNAs are composed of two complementary strands, passenger (sense) and guide (antisense) strands. The guide strand binds to AGO2 and is activated through the RISC, leading to the degradation of complementary mRNA (Figure 3B). The siRNA drugs used to treat malignant tumors, mainly in clinical phases, are as follows (Table 2).
TABLE 2

List of siRNAs in clinical trials

Development product nameTargetDDSApplicationStageDevelopment company/hospitalNCT# and others
Ongoing clinical trials
ALN‐VSP02KSP/VEGFSNALPHepatocellular carcinomaPhase IAlnylam PharmaceuticalsNCT00882180
NCT01158079
APN 401Cbl‐bnone (in vitro electroporation)Solid tumorsPhase IAPEIRON BiologicNCT03087591
ARO‐HIF2HIF2αUndisclosed (TRiM™ platform)Clear cell renal cell carcinomaPhase IArrowhead PharmaceuticalsNCT04169711
Atu027PKN3AtuPLEXPancreatic carcinomaPhase Ib/IIaSilence TherapeuticsNCT00938574
NCT01808638
EPHARNAEphA2DOPCSolid tumorsPhase IM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNCT01591356
iExosomesKRASG12D ExosomePancreatic CancerPhase IM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNCT03608631
NBF‐006GST‐πLNPNSCLCPhase INitto BioPharmaNCT03819387
NU‐0129BCL2L12Gold core SNPRecurrent glioblastoma/gliosarcomaEarly Phase INorthwestern UniversityNCT03020017
siG12D‐LODERKRASG12D LODER (bio‐degradable matrix)Pancreatic cancer/pancreatic ductal carcinomaPhase IISilenseedNCT01676259
SRN‐14PRDM14PEG‐PLOBreast cancerPhase IThe Cancer Institute Hospital Of JFCR(jRCT2031190181)
STNM01CHST15Pancreatic cancerPhase IIaKeio University(jRCT2031190055)
STP705TGF‐β1/COX‐2Polypeptide nanoparticle (PNP)Hepatocellular carcinoma /isSCC, Bowen's diseasePhase I/IISirnaomicsNCT04676633
NCT04293679
NCT04844983
SXL01ARUndisclosedProstate cancerPhase IInstitut Claudius RegaudNCT02866916
TKM‐080301PLK1SNALPHepatocellular carcinomaPhase I/IIArbutus BiopharmaNCT02191878
NCT01262235
Discontinued and terminated clinical trials
Development product nameTargetDDSApplicationStageDevelopment company/hospitalNCT# and others
CALAA‐01RRM2CAL101/AD‐PEG/AD‐PEG‐TfSolid tumorsPhase I, terminatedCalando PharmaceuticalsNCT00689065
DCR‐MYCa c‐MycLNPHepatocellular carcinomaPhase Ib/2, terminatedDicerna PharmaceuticalsNCT02314052
Nek2 siRNANek2AtelocollagenPancreatic CancerPhase I, terminatedNagoya University(UMIN000016330)
TDM‐812b RPN2A6KBreast cancerPhase I, terminatedSt. Luke’s International Hospital(jRCT2031200057)

Note: Termination reasons are (a) withdrawn from business and (b) COVID‐19 pandemic.

List of siRNAs in clinical trials Note: Termination reasons are (a) withdrawn from business and (b) COVID‐19 pandemic. ALN‐VSP02 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation containing two chemically modified siRNAs against kinesin spindle protein and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), with stable nucleic acid lipid particles (SNALPs) as DDSs and is introduced intravenously. In a phase 1 trial for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other tumors with liver involvement, 8.3% of patients receiving doses ≤0.4 mg/kg presented SD for at least 2 months and 46.6% of patients receiving doses ≥0.7 mg/kg presented SD or PR. In particular, human tissue samples showed RNAi‐mediated target mRNA cleavage. ARO‐HIF2 is composed of HIF2 siRNA targeting HIF2α and uses a proprietary targeted‐RNAi molecule (TRiM) delivery platform, which comprises targeting ligands, such as RGD motifs designed to transport siRNA to cancer cells. ARO‐HIF2 use resulted in HIF2α mRNA knockdown, tumor growth inhibition, and OS improvement in a xenograft model of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, frequently involving the inactivation of the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor, leading to the accumulation of HIFs. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals reported that seven of nine tumor samples had a low HIF2α level, and one patient achieved partial response with tumor shrinkage of approximately 65% in a phase 1 study. Atu027 is a liposomal siRNA formulation targeting human PKN3, which acts as a Rho effector downstream of phosphoinositide 3‐kinase signaling, with AtuPLEX comprising three types of lipids. In a phase 1 study of patients with advanced solid tumors, 41% patients had SD for at least 8 weeks. Combination of Atu027 with gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced PDAC in a phase 1b/2a study was safe, and twice‐weekly Atu027 dosing was observably superior to the once‐weekly regimen. EPHARNA, an EphA2 siRNA incorporated into 1,2‐dioleoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (DOPC) nanoliposomes, has been highly effective in reducing the EphA2 level in ovarian cancer cells in vivo. Patients with advanced recurrent solid tumors were enrolled and treated in the dose‐escalation phase (Table 2). iExosomes, exosomes expressing CD47, purified from human fibroblast cultures and electroporated to introduce the siRNA targeting KRASG12D, most prevalent in PDAC, were used in a preclinical trial. , In a phase 1 trial, participants with metastatic PDAC with KRASG12D were treated with mesenchymal stromal cell‐derived exosomes with iExosomes (Table 2). NBF‐006 is an lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation delivering an encapsulated siRNA that inhibits the expression of glutathione‐S‐transferase P (GST‐π). GST‐π weakens the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs by promoting their in vitro extrusion and functions as an MAPK‐pathway inhibitor to prevent the apoptosis of cells with KRAS and BRAF mutations. NBF‐006 significantly inhibits tumors in KRAS‐mutant animal models of NSCLC. Patients with progressive/metastatic NSCLC, PDAC, or CRC will be prescribed dose escalation, and those with previously treated KRAS‐mutated NSCLC under a high dose will be subjected to dose expansion in a clinical trial (Table 2). NU‐0129 is a gold‐base spherical nucleic acid nanoconjugate siRNA against BCL2‐like protein 12 (BCL2L12), an anti‐apoptotic factor expressed in glioma cells. NU‐0129 can permeate the blood–brain and blood–tumor barriers and reach glioblastoma cells. In an early phase 1 study of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, followed by tumor resection, NU‐0129 uptake into glioma cells correlated with the reduction in tumor‐associated BCL2L12 expression. siG12D‐LODER, a miniature biodegradable matrix, is a copolymer of high‐molecular weight poly (lactic‐co‐glycolic) acid (PLGA) encompassing a novel siRNA targeting KRASG12D and all additional G12 mutations. It is placed in PDAC using an endoscopic ultrasound biopsy procedure. In an open‐label phase 1/2a study, siG12D‐LODER plus gemcitabine or modified FOLFIRINOX was well tolerated and safe, and it demonstrated potential efficacy in patients with locally advanced PDAC. SRN‐14 is a PRDM14‐specific double‐stranded RNA/DNA chimera combined with a novel branched PEGylated polyaminoacid‐based intravenous DDS. PRDM14 is expressed at considerable levels in several cancers but is not expressed in normal tissues; it confers stem cell‐like properties to cancer cells. , The use of PEGylated poly‐L‐ornithine, a novel DDS, leads to the accumulation of the siRNA in target cancer tissues, rather than the liver and spleen, owing to its narrow and monodisperse size distribution. This siRNA drug reduced the size of inoculated tumors, suppressed distant metastasis, relieved chemo‐drug resistance, and improved prognosis in nude mice. Our package of pre‐clinical tests and production of an investigational new drug using GMP‐grade active pharmaceutical ingredients has been approved by PMDA. A physician‐initiated phase 1 trial of patients with triple‐negative breast cancer has been started (Table 2). STNM01 selectively inhibits the expression of carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15, an enzyme that promotes tumor invasion and correlates with a poor prognosis in PDAC. Repeated endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided fine‐needle injection of STNM01 in PDAC as a second‐line treatment was safe and feasible in a phase 1/2a study. The 6‐month survival rate of patients treated with 10,000 nM STNM01 was 83.3%. STP705 is composed of siRNA oligonucleotides targeting TGFB1 and COX‐2 mRNAs formulated with nanoparticles containing a unique histidine‐lysine copolymer peptide. , Clinical trials for STP705 with intravenous or intralesional administration in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors in phase 1 or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (in situ) in phase 2 are currently underway. TKM‐080301 is an SNALP formulation against Polo‐like kinase 1, a serine/threonine kinase associated with poor prognoses. Phase 1/2 studies for adrenocortical cancer and advanced HCC have been conducted; preliminary antitumor efficacy has been observed. ,

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Antisense oligonucleotides and siRNAs are not commercially available for cancer treatment, and several problems discussed in the review impede their use in oligonucleotide therapy. Oligonucleotide therapeutics must be based on biological engineering, such as nucleic acid chemistry, especially related to stability in vivo, and avoidance of off‐target effects, focusing on DDS. Due to space limitations, we referred to recent advances and problems of DDS in nucleic acid medicine with an actual case of siRNA drugs for patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis developed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. LNPs have been used as a DDS of patisiran targeting transthyretin mRNA via intravenous administration once every 2 weeks. LNPs accumulate in the liver in an apolipoprotein E‐dependent manner. Later, vutrisiran was developed using enhanced stabilization chemistry technology for the modification of siRNA‐conjugated GalNAc via subcutaneous administration once every 3 months. GalNAc binds to the liver‐expressed asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 with high affinity. Therefore, drug efficacy of ligand conjugation with chemically modified siRNA is more effective than that of LNPs. However, the accumulation of siRNA drugs in target lesions except the liver has not been successful. Ligand‐conjugated siRNAs or new types of DDS, such as PEGylated poly‐L‐ornithine, have the potential to solve this difficulty. Consequently, researchers will be able to overcome the existing problems regarding the application of oligonucleotide therapeutics in the clinical context.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

H.T. is a supervisor, contributed to the concept, and wrote and edited the manuscript. Y.A. contributed to the concept and wrote and edited the manuscript. Y.S edited the figures and tables. K.I. is a supervisor and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Hiroaki Taniguchi has received research funding from NanoCarrier Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
  47 in total

1.  Generation and testing of clinical-grade exosomes for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mayela Mendt; Sushrut Kamerkar; Hikaru Sugimoto; Kathleen M McAndrews; Chia-Chin Wu; Mihai Gagea; Sujuan Yang; Elena V Rodriges Blanko; Qian Peng; Xiaoyan Ma; Joseph R Marszalek; Anirban Maitra; Cassian Yee; Katayoun Rezvani; Elizabeth Shpall; Valerie S LeBleu; Raghu Kalluri
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-04-19

2.  A randomized phase 2 study of a HSP27 targeting antisense, apatorsen with prednisone versus prednisone alone, in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evan Y Yu; Susan L Ellard; Sebastien J Hotte; Joel R Gingerich; Anthony M Joshua; Martin E Gleave; Kim N Chi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Therapeutic EphA2 gene targeting in vivo using neutral liposomal small interfering RNA delivery.

Authors:  Charles N Landen; Arturo Chavez-Reyes; Corazon Bucana; Rosemarie Schmandt; Michael T Deavers; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A phase I/II study of LY900003, an antisense inhibitor of protein kinase C-alpha, in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Miguel A Villalona-Calero; Paul Ritch; Jose A Figueroa; Gregory A Otterson; Robert Belt; Edward Dow; Sebastian George; James Leonardo; Spence McCachren; G Lance Miller; Manuel Modiano; Manuel Valdivieso; Richard Geary; Jennifer W Oliver; Jon Holmlund
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Atu027, a liposomal small interfering RNA formulation targeting protein kinase N3, inhibits cancer progression.

Authors:  Manuela Aleku; Petra Schulz; Oliver Keil; Ansgar Santel; Ute Schaeper; Britta Dieckhoff; Oliver Janke; Jens Endruschat; Birgit Durieux; Nadine Röder; Kathrin Löffler; Christian Lange; Melanie Fechtner; Kristin Möpert; Gerald Fisch; Sibylle Dames; Wolfgang Arnold; Karin Jochims; Klaus Giese; Bertram Wiedenmann; Arne Scholz; Jörg Kaufmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  First-in-humans trial of an RNA interference therapeutic targeting VEGF and KSP in cancer patients with liver involvement.

Authors:  Josep Tabernero; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Patricia M LoRusso; Andres Cervantes; Gary K Schwartz; Glen J Weiss; Luis Paz-Ares; Daniel C Cho; Jeffrey R Infante; Maria Alsina; Mrinal M Gounder; Rick Falzone; Jamie Harrop; Amy C Seila White; Iva Toudjarska; David Bumcrot; Rachel E Meyers; Gregory Hinkle; Nenad Svrzikapa; Renta M Hutabarat; Valerie A Clausen; Jeffrey Cehelsky; Saraswathy V Nochur; Christina Gamba-Vitalo; Akshay K Vaishnaw; Dinah W Y Sah; Jared A Gollob; Howard A Burris
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Silencing PRDM14 expression by an innovative RNAi therapy inhibits stemness, tumorigenicity, and metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Taniguchi; Daisuke Hoshino; Chiharu Moriya; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Nobuhiro Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Kazunori Kataoka; Kohzoh Imai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

8.  STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide AZD9150 in a subset of patients with heavily pretreated lymphoma: results of a phase 1b trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Reilley; Patricia McCoon; Carl Cook; Paul Lyne; Razelle Kurzrock; Youngsoo Kim; Richard Woessner; Anas Younes; John Nemunaitis; Nathan Fowler; Michael Curran; Qinying Liu; Tianyuan Zhou; Joanna Schmidt; Minji Jo; Samantha J Lee; Mason Yamashita; Steven G Hughes; Luis Fayad; Sarina Piha-Paul; Murali V P Nadella; Xiaokun Xiao; Jeff Hsu; Alexey Revenko; Brett P Monia; A Robert MacLeod; David S Hong
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  Overexpression of carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15 in pancreatic cancer stroma is associated with worse prognosis.

Authors:  Yoko Matsuda; Yuko Fujii; Miho Matsukawa; Toshiyuki Ishiwata; Makoto Nishimura; Tomio Arai
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Antitumoral RNA-targeted oligonucleotide therapeutics: The third pillar after small molecule inhibitors and antibodies.

Authors:  Hiroaki Taniguchi; Yasunori Suzuki; Kohzoh Imai; Yasushi Adachi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.518

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.