| Literature DB >> 35698651 |
Bowen Wu1, Li Tan2, Weihua Wang3, Xingzhong Feng4, Dan Yan1,5,6.
Abstract
Background: Imidazole Propionate (ImP) is a new marker of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which can induce impaired glucose metabolism and weaken the efficacy of metformin. An extensive exploration into literature suggests that ImP may be associated with stool consistency. Purpose: Through an in-depth study of the relationship between stool consistency, bile acids, fecal microbiota and ImP, we intend to explore the mechanism driving the ImP content difference in T2DM. Patients Under Study andEntities:
Keywords: ImP; T2DM; bile acids; stool consistency
Year: 2022 PMID: 35698651 PMCID: PMC9188368 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S362715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.249
Patient Characteristics According to Stool Consistency
| Characteristic | Stool Consistency (Normal) (n=56) | Stool Consistency (Abnormal) (n=40) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImP (nmol/L) | 9.4±3.44 | 18.5±4.23 | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 54.8±3.27 | 60.0±3.19 | 0.017 |
| Course of disease (years) | 9.4±2.64 | 14.8±3.24 | 0.012 |
| Weight (kg) | 76.3±4.14 | 68.7±3.75 | 0.032 |
| Height (cm) | 169.5±3.12 | 168.2±8.16 | 0.491 |
| BMI | 26.3±2.04 | 24.4±4.12 | 0.031 |
| Waist (cm) | 95.4±3.47 | 92.1±3.52 | 0.116 |
| Hip (cm) | 98.5±3.02 | 97.1±3.04 | 0.376 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 1.0±0.25 | 0.9±0.25 | 0.147 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg): systolic | 129.8±5.35 | 130.8±4.43 | 0.456 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg): diastolic | 77.3±3.34 | 77.1±3.21 | 0.797 |
| Capillary plasma glucose (mmol/L): fasting | 7.3±1.55 | 7.4±2.78 | 0.854 |
| Capillary plasma glucose (mmol/L): 2 h | 16.0±2.07 | 15.2±2.03 | 0.419 |
| Insulin (pmol/L): fasting | 10.3±2.80 | 7.2±2.24 | 0.076 |
| Insulin (pmol/L): 2 h | 52.5±7.32 | 27.9±4.29 | 0.036 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.8±1.40 | 8.8±1.34 | 0.928 |
| HOMA-β | 74.2±8.62 | 60.2±7.76 | 0.069 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.2±1.80 | 2.2±4.19 | 0.445 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.5±1.07 | 4.3±1.16 | 0.18 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 0.9±0.46 | 1.0±0.50 | 0.314 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.6±0.87 | 2.4±0.92 | 0.066 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.0±1.10 | 1.9±1.25 | 0.111 |
Abbreviations: ImP, imidazole propionate; BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1Imidazole propionate is associated with the stool consistency. (A and B) Plasma levels of imidazole propionate (ImP) in subjects with Type 2 diabetes divided according to the stool consistency. (C) Plasma levels of ImP in healthy subjects divided according to the stool consistency. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of the ImP
| Characteristics | Correlation | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Stool consistency Normal | −0.326 | 0.002 |
| Stool consistency Hard | 0.279 | 0.009 |
| Capillary plasma glucose (mmol/L): 2 h (mmol/L) | 0.249 | 0.020 |
| Weight (kg) | −0.197 | 0.067 |
| BMI | −0.178 | 0.100 |
| Course of disease (years) | 0.140 | 0.196 |
| Insulin (uIU/mL): 2 h | −0.135 | 0.212 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg): diastolic | 0.135 | 0.213 |
| Age (years) | 0.129 | 0.233 |
| Insulin (uIU/mL): fasting | −0.128 | 0.236 |
| Stool consistency Soft | 0.110 | 0.309 |
| Capillary plasma glucose (mmol/L): fasting | 0.109 | 0.316 |
| HbA1c (%) | 0.103 | 0.344 |
| HOMA-IR | −0.099 | 0.362 |
| HOMA-β | −0.083 | 0.446 |
| Height (cm) | −0.081 | 0.457 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | −0.080 | 0.460 |
| Waist (cm) | −0.043 | 0.693 |
| TC (mmol/L) | −0.039 | 0.718 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 0.035 | 0.747 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg): systolic | 0.033 | 0.764 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.032 | 0.767 |
| Sex Female | −0.031 | 0.772 |
| Sex Male | 0.031 | 0.772 |
| Hip (cm) | −0.008 | 0.939 |
| TG (mmol/L) | <0.001 | 0.999 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 2Imidazole propionate is associated with bile acids. (A) Imidazole propionate (ImP) level of subjects with LCA ≤ 30% was significantly higher than that of those with LCA > 30%. (B) Subjects with CDCA ≥ 5% had significantly higher ImP levels than those with CDCA < 5%. **P < 0.01.
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of the ImP and Bile Acids
| Bile Acid | Correlation (Feces) | P value (Feces) | Correlation (Plasma) | P value (Plasma) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | −0.075 | 0.233 | −0.003 | 0.015 |
| CDCA | −0.03 | 0.59 | −0.008 | 0.836 |
| DCA | 0.022 | 0.399 | 0.007 | 0.394 |
| LCA | 0.006 | 0.415 | −0.038 | 0.780 |
| TUDCA | −0.141 | 0.091 | 0.694 | 0.633 |
| HDCA | −0.056 | 0.328 | −0.025 | 0.111 |
| GUDCA | 0.441 | 0.074 | −0.015 | 0.755 |
| GDCA | −0.019 | 0.414 | −0.013 | 0.501 |
| TDCA | 0.006 | 0.421 | 0.221 | 0.003 |
| UDCA | 0.017 | 0.056 | 0.012 | 0.468 |
| GCDCA | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.020 | 0.021 |
| GCA | −0.083 | 0.086 | −0.040 | 0.031 |
| TCA | 0.102 | 0.003 | 0.0140 | 0.440 |
Abbreviations: CA, cholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; LCA, lithocholic acid; TUDCA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid; HDCA, hyodeoxycholic acid; GUDCA, glycoursodeoxycholic acid; GDCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; TDCA, taurodeoxycholate; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholate; GCA, glycocholic acid; TCA, taurocholic acid.
Figure 3Classification of microbial diversity in patients with different fecal consistencies. (A) The Shannon index of group N was significantly higher than that of Group H and Group S. (B) These three groups were separated into different clusters in the UniFrac PCoA. (C and D) Bar plots of the relative abundances of the three groups at the phylum level and the genus level. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.