| Literature DB >> 35696097 |
Reham S Ibrahim1, Nesrine S El-Mezayen2, Asmaa Khairy1, Hala H Zaatout1, Hala M Hammoda1, Aly M Metwally1.
Abstract
Hyperthyroidism is a common endocrine disorder associated with increased risk of cardiovascular complications and mortality. Although antithyroid drugs (ATDs) are approved as first line option for many hyperthyroidism cases, including pregnancy and childhood, they exert significant toxic profile. Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) also called "The father of all food" was among the diet consumed by mares that gave birth to foals with congenital hypothyroidism. Since, greenfeed was accused for the development of such condition, alfalfa may possess constituents with promising antithyroid potential that could be a valuable substitute for the conventional ATDs. The current work was designed to identify the most biologically active antithyroid phytoconstituent separated from alfalfa sprouts and comparing its antithyroid mechanism, efficacy and toxic profile to the standard ATD; propylthiouracil (PTU). The most biologically active solvent fractions from alfalfa sprouts extract were identified by in vitro screening for anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) activity, from which different phytoconstituents were separated and identified by interpretation of spectroscopic data. These compounds were then in vitro screened for anti-TPO and virtually screened via GLIDE XP docking into the crystal structures of the enzymes; bovine lactoperoxidase, as an alternative to TPO, and mammalian selenocysteine-dependent iodothyronine deiodinase (IDI), that are both uniquely dually prohibited by PTU. The compound that showed the least TPO IC50 and highest combined docking XP score was elected for comparing its antithyroid mechanism, efficacy, tendency to reverse hyperthyroidism-triggered complications and toxicity to PTU using L-thyroxine-induced hyperthyroidism model in rats. Seven compounds (1-7) were isolated from the most biologically active fraction, whilst, compounds (4-7) were reported for the first time from alfalfa sprouts. Compound 5 (apigenin) showed the least TPO IC50 and highest in-silico combined score, thus, apigenin was selected for further in-vivo investigations. Apigenin was found to more effectively interfere with type 1-IDI than with TPO in vivo. Apigenin therapy resulted in nearly euthyroid state, without incidence of hypothyroidism, thyroid hypertrophy, hepatotoxity or WBCs count reduction. In addition, apigenin, but not PTU, corrected hyperthyroidism-induced left ventricular hypertyrophy. Therefore, apigenin is a natural lead antithyroid drug that represents a possible safer alternative to conventional ATDs.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35696097 PMCID: PMC9261795 DOI: 10.38212/2224-6614.1242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
TPO IC50 of different alfalfa sprout extract fractions, separated compounds from the most biologically active fractions and of PTU.
| Extract Fraction | IC50 (mg/mL) | Separated Compound | IC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Petroleum ether | NA | —— | —— |
| Methylene chloride | 1.78 | Spinasterol | NA |
| Liquiritigenin | 84.37 | ||
| Isoliquiritigenin | 76.55 | ||
| Ethyl acetate | 1.67 | 4′,7-dihydroxyflavone | 112.04 |
| Apigenin | 41.07 | ||
| Medicarpin-3- | NA | ||
| Medicagenic acid-3- | NA | ||
| n-butanol | NA | —— | —— |
| PTU | 42.67 |
All measurements were done in triplicates and expressed as mean ± SD. (NA: not applicable; the compound did not produce an inhibition curve, PTU: propylthiouracil).
Fig. 1Extra-precision (XP) scores in (Kcal/mol) of the docked compounds in to the crystalline structures of lactoperoxidase (4gn6), IDI-1 (4tr3) and the combined scores for both enzymes.
Fig. 22D and 3D interaction diagrams of propylthiouracil and apigenin with lactoperoxidase (4gn6) and IDI-1 enzyme (4tr3).
Fig. 3The effect of apigenin and PTU on thyroidal TPO, hepatic IDI-1 expression and thyroid related hormones levels.
A: mRNA expression of thyroidal TPO and hepatic IDI-1; B-D: serum T3, T4 and TSH, respectively. ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey).*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), 2−ΔΔCt: normalized expression ratio, n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD. (PTU: propylthiouracil, TPO: thyroid peroxidase, IDI-1: type 1 iodothyronine deiodinase, T3: triiodothyronine, T4: thyroxine and TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone).
Fig. 4Effect of different therapies on thyroid gland histology.
A; H&E-stained thyroid gland tissue sections obtained from rats of different groups. B; Quantitative analysis of the thickness of thyroid gland follicular lining epithelium. All images were captured under magnification power ×400. Black arrows point to the lining epithelium of the follicles, Red arrow points to scalloping in colloid (C: colloid). The mean cross thickness of follicular lining epithelium was measured in twenty follicles in thyroid gland sections obtained from each rat for all groups using ImageJ software. ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey).*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 5Effect of different therapies on lipid profile of rats with induced hyperthyroidism.
ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey).*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 6Effect of different therapies on left ventricular hypertrophy.
A; Upper row shows H&E stained left ventricular tissue sections showing cardiomyocytes with longitudinal circular midwall muscle bundles obtained from different groups under magnification ×400 (double headed white arrows show examples of some selected sites for measuring myocyte width), lower row shows Masson’s trichrome left ventricular-stained tissue sections under magnification ×400. B; assessment of the percentage of left ventricular weight (LVW) in mg relative to total body weight (BW) in g in different experimental groups. C; Quantification of the mean myocyte width measured in 50 cells per each H&E stained sections of left ventricle samples using ImageJ software. D; Quantification of the mean blue color intensity (representing the amount of fibrous tissue) in Masson’s trichrome stained left ventricles sections. ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey). *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 7Effect of different drugs on liver histology and enzymes.
A; H&E-stained liver tissue sections obtained from different groups under magnification power ×200. B; biochemical assessment of liver enzymes in sera obtained from rats of different groups (ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase). C; quantitative estimation of mean hepatic sinusoidal width measured in H & E stained liver tissue sections using imageJ software. ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey). *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 8Effect of different therapies on white blood cell count in rats with L-thyroxine-induced hyperthyroidism
ANOVA test was used to compare between the different groups with Post Hoc Test (Tukey). *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, **: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001, N.S: Statistically non-significant (p > 0.05), n = 8; all results are presented as mean ± SD.
1H and 13C NMR data of compounds 1 and 7
| Position | 1 (CDCl3) | 7 (MeOH-d4) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 37.15 | 1.09 (H-1a, m), 1.82 (H-1b, m) | 43.26 | 1.30 (H-1a, m), 2.10 (H-1b, m) |
| 2 | 31.49 | 1.39 (H-2a, m), 1.77 (H-2b, m) | 69.75 | 4.30 (1H, dd, |
| 3 | 71.07 | 3.61 (1H, m) | 84.70 | 4.10 (1H, d, |
| 4 | 38.01 | 1.27 (H-4a, m), 1.70 (H-4b, m) | 67.70 | – |
| 5 | 40.2 | 1.40 (1H, m) | 51.62 | 1.60 (1H, m) |
| 6 | 29.77 | 1.22 (H-6a, m), 1.74 (H-6b, m) | 20.20 | 1.20 (H-6a, m), 70 (H-6b, m) |
| 7 | 117.46 | 5.16 (1H, br s) | 32.25 | 1.32 (1H, m) |
| 8 | 139.50 | – | 39.51 | – |
| 9 | 49.46 | 1.65 (1H, m) | 48.48 | 1.60 (1H, m) |
| 10 | 34.20 | – | 35.90 | – |
| 11 | 21.56 | 1.48 (2H, m) | 23.25 | 2.06 (H-11a, m), 2.16 (H-11b, m) |
| 12 | 39.47 | 1.23 (H-12a, m), 2.02 (H-12b, m) | 122.10 | 5.30 (1H, t, |
| 13 | 43.30 | – | 143.80 | – |
| 14 | 41.67 | – | ||
| 15 | 27.30 | 1.10 (H-15a, m), 1.80 (H-15b, m) | ||
| 16 | 55.14 | 1.81 (1H, m) | 22.66 | 1.60 (H-16a, m), 2.05 (H-16b, m) |
| 17 | 22.98 | 1.40 (H-15a, m), 1.52 (H-15b, m) | 46.24 | – |
| 18 | 28.52 | 1.25 (2H, m) | 41.35 | 2.85 (IH, dd, |
| 19 | 55.90 | 1.25 (1H, m) | 45.85 | 1.16 (H-19a, m) 1.70 (H-19b, m) |
| 20 | 12.00 | 0.57 (3H, s) | 30.23 | – |
| 21 | 13.06 | 0.80 (3H, s) | 32.43 | 1.59 (H-21a, m) 1.80 (H-21b, m) |
| 22 | 40.84 | 2.05 (1H, m) | 33.52 | 1.20 (H-22a, m) 1.40 (H-22b, m) |
| 23 | 21.39 | 1.03 (3H, d, | 181.00 | – |
| 24 | 138.10 | 5.14 (1H, dd, | 12.50 | 1.40 (3H, s) |
| 25 | 129.4 | 5.02 (1H, dd, | 15.70 | 1.30 (3H, s) |
| 26 | 51.26 | 1.55 (1H, m) | 16.20 | 0.84 (3H, s) |
| 27 | 31.89 | 1.55 (1H, m) | 25.10 | 1.18 (3H, s) |
| 28 | 21.11 | 0.86 (3H, d, | 180.00 | – |
| 29 | 19.01 | 0.84 (3H, d, | 32.21 | 0.94 (3H, s) |
| 30 | 22.60 | 0.97 (3H, s) | ||
| Glu | ||||
| 1′ | 103.47 | 4.40 (d, | ||
| 2′ | 73.80 | 3.26 (1H, m) | ||
| 3′ | 76.35 | 3.29 (1H, m) | ||
| 4′ | 69.63 | 3.40 (1H, m) | ||
| 5′ | 76.33 | 3.39 (1H, m) | ||
| 6′ | 60.86 | 3.70 (H-6′a, m) 3.80 (H-6′b, m) | ||
Int: integration of the NMR signal (showing the number of H); mult.: multiplicity of the NMR signal; J: coupling constant; s: singlet; bs: broad singlet; d: doublet; dd: doublet of doublet; m: mutiplet.
1H and 13C NMR data of compounds 2, 4 and 5 in MeOH-d4
| 2 | 4 | 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 2 | 79.62 | ( | 164.53 | – | 167.05 | – |
| 3 | 43.56 | ( | 103.67 | 6.69 (1H, s) | 102.45 | 6.61 (1H, s) |
| ( | ||||||
| 4 | 192.07 | – | 184.11 | – | 182.50 | – |
| 5 | 128.42 | 7.75 (1H, d, | 126.27 | 7.98 (1H, d, | 163.50 | – |
| 6 | 110.56 | 6.51 (1H, dd, | 115.16 | 6.93 (1H, dd, | 98.87 | 6.23 (1H, d, |
| 7 | 164.11 | – | 161.29 | – | 165.03 | – |
| 8 | 102.47 | 6.36 (1H, d, | 102.15 | 6.97 (1H, d, | 93.75 | 6.48 (1H, d, |
| 9 | 169.90 | – | 160.12 | – | 159.50 | – |
| 10 | 113.70 | – | 117.17 | – | 105.30 | – |
| 1′ | 129.98 | – | 125.11 | – | 121.98 | – |
| 2′,6′ | 127.59 | 7.38 (2H, d, | 127.95 | 7.9 (2H, d, | 128.07 | 7.88 (2H, d, |
| 3′,5′ | 114.90 | 6.88 (2H, d, | 115.62 | 6.95 (2H, d, | 115.76 | 6.95 (2H, d, |
| 4′ | 159.00 | – | 162.01 | – | 161.34 | – |
Int: integration of the NMR signal (showing the number of H); mult.: multiplicity of the NMR signal; J: coupling constant; d: doublet; dd: doublet of doublet.
1H and 13C NMR data of compound 3 in DMSO-d6
| 1 | 126.22 | – |
| 2,6 | 131.65 | 7.78 (2H, d, |
| 3,5 | 116.31 | 6.84 (2H, d, |
| 4 | 160.74 | – |
|
| 117.91 | 7.76 (1H, d, |
|
| 144.60 | 7.77(1H, d, |
| 191.89 | – | |
| 1′ | 114.20 | – |
| 2′ | 166.29 | – |
| 3′ | 103.07 | 6.26 (1H, d, |
| 4′ | 167.50 | – |
| 5′ | 108.75 | 6.39 (1H, dd, |
| 6′ | 133.27 | 8.15 (1H, d, |
| 2′ –OH | – | 13.67 (1H,s) |
Int: integration of the NMR signal (showing the number of H); mult.: multiplicity of the NMR signal; J: coupling constant; s: singlet; d: doublet; dd: doublet of doublet.
1H and 13C NMR data of compound 6 in DMSO-d6
| 1 | 132.45 | 7.38 (1H, d, |
| 2 | 110.89 | 6.72 (1H, dd, |
| 3 | 160.61 | – |
| 4 | 104.43 | 6.54 (1H, d, 2.5 Hz) |
| 4a | 158.80 | – |
| 6 | 66.39 | 3.73 (1H, dd, |
| 191.89 | 4.27 (1H, dd, | |
| 6a | 40.20 | 3.59 (1H, ddd, |
| 6b | 119.61 | – |
| 7 | 125.69 | 7.24 (1H, d, |
| 8 | 106.61 | 6.45 (1H, dd, |
| 9 | 161.58 | – |
| 10 | 96.72 | 6.40 (1H, d, |
| 10a | 160.97 | – |
| 11a | 78.21 | 5.60 (1H, d, |
| 11b | 114.79 | – |
| OCH3 | 55.74 | 3.69 (3H, s) |
| 1′ | 100.62 | 4.80 (1H, d, |
| 2′ | 73.41 | 3.10–3.27 (4H, m) |
| 3′ | 76.60 | |
| 4′ | 69.96 | |
| 5′ | 77.27 | |
| 6′ | 60.95 | 3.30 (H-6′a, m) |
Int: integration of the NMR signal (showing the number of H); mult.: multiplicity of the NMR signal; J: coupling constant; s: singlet; d: doublet; dd: doublet of doublet; m: mutiplet.