Literature DB >> 35696054

Bioavailability Study of a Transdermal Patch Formulation of Rivastigmine Compared with Exelon in Healthy Subjects.

Adelaida Morte1, Anna Vaqué1, Marc Iniesta2, Barbara Schug3, Cornelius Koch3,4, Rafael De la Torre5, Bjoern Schurad6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rivastigmine is a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of all stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Transdermal patch formulation allows smooth and continuous drug delivery. Its tolerability, efficacy and convenience of use increase treatment compliance. This study was designed to evaluate the bioavailability and to assess the bioequivalence of two rivastigmine transdermal patches at steady state (RIV-TDS Test Product versus Exelon Marketed Reference Product), with a release rate of 13.3 mg/24 h, after multiple patch applications. As secondary objectives, safety, patch adhesion and skin irritation were evaluated.
METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, balanced, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study of healthy adults (n = 31). The treatment period consisted of two 5-day study periods during which consecutive daily application of the investigational patches with a release rate of 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine took place. Serial blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentrations. Adhesion and skin irritation assessments were performed after application of patches.
RESULTS: Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of pharmacokinetic parameters at steady state, viz. area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from dosing time to the end of the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [AUC0-τ,ss] (97.4; 88.8-106.9), maximum plasma concentration within the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [Cmax,ss] (99.6; 90.4-109.7) and trough plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [Cτ,ss] (96.8; 86.2-108.9), demonstrated that both patches were bioequivalent. Evaluation of patch adhesion showed better skin adherence for RIV-TDS as well as dermal response scores (skin tolerability after removal).
CONCLUSIONS: For both products, bioequivalence was shown and systemic tolerability was in accordance with the safety profile of the drug substance. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03573050 and EudraCT: 2018-000968-28.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35696054     DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00778-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  12 in total

Review 1.  An update on the safety of current therapies for Alzheimer's disease: focus on rivastigmine.

Authors:  Rita Khoury; Jayashree Rajamanickam; George T Grossberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2018-01-08

Review 2.  Use of transdermal drug formulations in the elderly.

Authors:  Laure-Zoé Kaestli; Anne-Florence Wasilewski-Rasca; Pascal Bonnabry; Nicole Vogt-Ferrier
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Real-world Utilisation of the Rivastigmine Transdermal Patches Accompanying the use of Risk Minimisation Tools in Patients with Dementia.

Authors:  Fritjof Reinhardt; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Rajesh Karan; Uday Kiran Veldandi; Sunil Modali; Krishna Duvvuri; Rashid Khan Pathan
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patches versus capsules for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Rafael Blesa; Clive Ballard; Jean-Marc Orgogozo; Roger Lane; Simu K Thomas
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  IDEAL: a 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the first skin patch for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  B Winblad; G Grossberg; L Frölich; M Farlow; S Zechner; J Nagel; R Lane
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease:: getting on and staying on.

Authors:  George T Grossberg
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-04

Review 7.  Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Gabriella Marucci; Michela Buccioni; Diego Dal Ben; Catia Lambertucci; Rosaria Volpini; Francesco Amenta
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching from Oral Cholinesterase Inhibitors to Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch with 1-Step Titration in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A 24-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Study in Japan.

Authors:  Kengo Ueda; Sadao Katayama; Tetsuaki Arai; Nobuo Furuta; Shinichiro Ikebe; Yoshinori Ishida; Kiyoshi Kanaya; Shinji Ouma; Hirofumi Sakurai; Masato Sugitani; Makio Takahashi; Toshihisa Tanaka; Norifumi Tsuno; Yosuke Wakutani; Ankita Shekhawat; Ayan Das Gupta; Kazuki Kiyose; Kazuhiro Toriyama; Yu Nakamura
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2019-08-15

9.  The Efficacy of Transdermal Rivastigmine in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease with Concomitant Small Vessel Cerebrovascular Disease: Findings from an Open-Label Study.

Authors:  Chathuri Yatawara; Fatin Zahra Zailan; Esther Vanessa Chua; Linda Lay Hoon Lim; Eveline Silva; Joanna Sihan Wang; Adeline Ng; Kok Pin Ng; Nagaendran Kandiah
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Comparative safety and effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai-Xin Dou; Meng-Shan Tan; Chen-Chen Tan; Xi-Peng Cao; Xiao-He Hou; Qi-Hao Guo; Lan Tan; Vincent Mok; Jin-Tai Yu
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 6.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.