Fritjof Reinhardt 1 , Nikolaos Scarmeas 2 , Rajesh Karan 3 , Uday Kiran Veldandi 4 , Sunil Modali 4 , Krishna Duvvuri 4 , Rashid Khan Pathan 4 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transdermal patches are convenient to use, especially in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated dementia. However, various identified risks of errors in ad- ministering the patches cannot be disregarded. Patient Reminder Cards (PRCs, included a Medica- tion record sheet [MRS]) have been recently introduced as a risk minimisation tool to prevent incor- rect patch use (IU). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PRCs to prevent IU and to investigate the dose titration pattern of rivastigmine patches in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multinational, observational, 11-month study included patients with AD currently using rivastigmine patches (4.6 mg/day, 9.5 mg/day, 13.3 mg/day) accompanied by a caregiver. Study outcomes were IU, including multiple patch use (MPU), incorrect patch placement, other IUs, perceived usefulness of the PRCs, and titration patterns of the patches. RESULTS: Of the total 614 patients included, most were aged ≥65 years and had mild-to-moderate AD. Before and during the study, 27.7% and 18.0% of patients reported IU, respectively. Most pa- tients used MRS, and 73.5% rated it 'helpful' and reported lower rates of IU than those who report- ed it 'not helpful' (13.9%-16.5% vs. 20.2%). Overall, 141 patients had dose titrations, with 75.8% being up-titrated from 4.6 mg/day to 9.5 mg/day after a mean duration of 58 days. Safety findings were consistent with the established profile for the rivastigmine patch. CONCLUSION: PRC was effective as a risk minimisation tool in limiting the inappropriate use of ri- vastigmine patches. The majority of patients requiring dose-change were up-titrated to 9.5 mg/day patches. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
BACKGROUND: Transdermal patches are convenient to use, especially in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD )-associated dementia . However, various identified risks of errors in ad - ministering the patches cannot be disregarded. Patient Reminder Cards (PRCs, included a Medica- tion record sheet [MRS]) have been recently introduced as a risk minimisation tool to prevent incor- rect patch use (IU). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PRCs to prevent IU and to investigate the dose titration pattern of rivastigmine patches in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multinational, observational, 11-month study included patients with AD currently using rivastigmine patches (4.6 mg/day, 9.5 mg/day, 13.3 mg/day) accompanied by a caregiver. Study outcomes were IU, including multiple patch use (MPU), incorrect patch placement, other IUs, perceived usefulness of the PRCs, and titration patterns of the patches. RESULTS: Of the total 614 patients included, most were aged ≥65 years and had mild-to-moderate AD . Before and during the study, 27.7% and 18.0% of patients reported IU, respectively. Most pa- tients used MRS, and 73.5% rated it 'helpful' and reported lower rates of IU than those who report- ed it 'not helpful' (13.9%-16.5% vs. 20.2%). Overall, 141 patients had dose titrations, with 75.8% being up-titrated from 4.6 mg/day to 9.5 mg/day after a mean duration of 58 days. Safety findings were consistent with the established profile for the rivastigmine patch. CONCLUSION: PRC was effective as a risk minimisation tool in limiting the inappropriate use of ri- vastigmine patches. The majority of patients requiring dose-change were up-titrated to 9.5 mg/day patches. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
Alzheimer<s dementia; Rivastigmine patch; inappropriate medication use; multiple patch use
Year: 2021
PMID: 34279198 DOI: 10.2174/1567205018666210716120540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res ISSN: 1567-2050 Impact factor: 3.498