| Literature DB >> 35695526 |
María Milagro Montero1,2,3,4,5, Sandra Domene-Ochoa1,2,3,4, Carla López-Causapé6, Inmaculada López-Montesinos1,2,3,4, Sonia Luque7,5, Luisa Sorlí1,2,3,4,5, Núria Campillo7, Eduardo Padilla8, Núria Prim8, Lorena Ferrer Alapont1,2,3,4, Santiago Grau7,5, Antonio Oliver6,5, Juan P Horcajada1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intermittent (1-h), extended (4-h), and continuous ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) infusion against three extensively drug-resistant (XDR) sequence type (ST) 175 P. aeruginosa isolates with different susceptibilities to C/T (MIC = 2 to 16 mg/L) in a 7-day hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). C/T in continuous infusion achieved the largest reduction in total number of bacterial colonies in the overall treatment arms for both C/T-susceptible and -resistant isolates. It was also the only regimen with bactericidal activity against all three isolates. These data suggest that continuous C/T infusion should be considered a potential treatment for infections caused by XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, including nonsusceptible ones. Proper use of C/T dosing regimens may lead to better clinical management of XDR P. aeruginosa infections. IMPORTANCE Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is an antipseudomonal antibiotic with a high clinical impact in treating infection caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, but resistance is emerging. Given its time-dependent behavior, C/T continuous infusion can improve exposure and therefore the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. We compared the efficacy of intermittent, extended, and continuous C/T infusion against three XDR ST175 P. aeruginosa isolates with different C/T MICs by means of an in vitro dynamic hollow-fiber model. We demonstrated that C/T in continuous infusion achieved the largest reduction in bacterial density in the overall treatment arms for both susceptible and resistant isolates. It was also the only regimen with bactericidal activity against all three isolates. Through this study, we want to demonstrate that developing individually tailored antimicrobial treatments is becoming essential. Our results support the role of C/T level monitoring and of dose adjustments for better clinical management and outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: PK/PD; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; XDR; ceftolozane/tazobactam; hollow-fiber
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35695526 PMCID: PMC9241897 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00892-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Mean reduction in number of bacterial colonies (CFU/mL) over 7 days in an in vitro HFIM model testing three C/T infusion regimens (1-h, 4-h, and continuous infusion) against three XDR ST175 P. aeruginosa isolates: (A) P. aeruginosa (10-023), (B) P. aeruginosa (09-012), and (C) P. aeruginosa (07-016), with respective C/T MIC values of 2, 8, and 16 mg/L. Experiments were conducted in duplicate. C/T, ceftolozane/tazobactam; CI, continuous infusion; Css, steady-state concentration; q8h, every 8 h; LLOD, lower limit of detection.
Mean overall reduction in number of bacterial colonies grown with alternative C/T infusion regimens for each ST175 isolate; parameters included log10 CFU/mL ± standard deviation, and LR of AUCFU
| Infusion regimen | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log diff day 7 | LR of AUCFU | Log diff day 7 | LR of AUCFU | Log diff day 7 | LR of AUCFU | |
| C/T 2/1 g q8h 1-h infusion vs control | −2.26 ± 0.19 | −3.37 | −2.53 ± 0.04 | −3.66 | −0.83 ± 0.22 | −2.90 |
| C/T 2/1 g q8h 4-h infusion vs control | −3.47 ± 0.10 | −3.38 | −3.19 ± 0.37 | −3.64 | −1.7 ± 0.33 | −3.15 |
| C/T 6 g q24h CI Css45 vs control | −4.46 ± 0.05 | −3.53 | −5.45 ± 0.18 | 3.69 | −4.94 ± 0.37 | −3.24 |
| C/T 6 g q24h CI Css45 vs C/T 2/1 g q8h 1-h infusion | −2.2 ± 0.1 | −1.01 | −2.92 ± 0.01 | −1.52 | −4.11 ± 0.12 | −2.1 |
| C/T 6 g q24h CI Css45 vs C/T 2/1 g q8h 4-h infusion | −0.99 ± 0.33 | −0.65 | −2.26 ± 0.2 | −1.23 | −3.24 ± 0.05 | −1.85 |
| C/T 2/1 g q8h 4-h infusion vs C/T 2/1 g q8h 1-h infusion | −1.21 ± 0.05 | −0.87 | −0.66 ± 0.15 | −0.10 | −0.87 ± 0.28 | −0.15 |
Log difference at the end of the assay for each regimen compared with the control.
The log difference is presented as the log ratio (LR), which is used to compare any number of log10 CFU of two regimens (test/reference). AUCFU, area under the curve for CFU; C/T, ceftolozane-tazobactam; CI, continuous infusion; Css, steady-state concentration; q8h, every 8 h.
Observed versus predicted antibiotic concentrations achieved in each HFIM model
| Dosing regimen | Free peak concn (mg/L) ± SD | Free trough concn (mg/L)/Css ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted value | Observed value | Predicted value | Observed value | |
| C/T 2/1 g q8h 1-h infusion | 74.45 | 61.96 ± 6.80 | 14.77 | 25.67 ± 3.7 |
| C/T 2/1 g q8h 4-h infusion | 54.55 | 53.10 ± 7.92 | 19.7 | 27.29 ± 5.63 |
| C/T 6 g q24h CI | 45 | 47.29 ± 5.43 | ||
Data are presented as the mean concentration ± standard deviation. Css, steady-state concentration; q8h 1-h, infusion over 1 h every 8 h (intermittent infusion); q8h 4-h, infusion over 4 h every 8 h (extended infusion); SD, standard deviation.
FIG 2Relationship between observed and predicted ceftolozane concentrations for intermittent (1-h), extended (4-h), and continuous C/T infusion regimens in the overall experiments. inf, infusion; CI, continuous infusion; Css, steady-state concentration.