| Literature DB >> 35692883 |
Qingchang Hu1, Qi Wang2, Fan Liu3, Lishuai Yao2, Lei Zhang2, Guangdong Chen4.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of calcitriol combined with zoledronic acid in posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures of the knee joint in patients with diabetic osteoporosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35692883 PMCID: PMC9187434 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6053410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Comparison of bone mineral density between the two groups (, mg/cm3).
| Groups |
| Greater trochanter | Femoral neck | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.13∗ | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.14∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.14∗ | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.73 ± 0.16∗ |
|
| / | 1.519 | 3.154 | 1.403 | 4.122 |
|
| / | 0.134 | 0.003 | 0.166 | <0.001 |
Note: compared with the same group before treatment, ∗p < 0.05.
Comparison of bone metabolism indexes between the two groups ().
| Groups |
|
| PINP (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02∗ | 38.26 ± 3.04 | 15.05 ± 2.15∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.04∗ | 38.37 ± 3.18 | 19.54 ± 2.36∗ |
|
| / | 1.155 | 8.573 | 0.137 | 7.703 |
|
| / | 0.253 | <0.001 | 0.892 | <0.001 |
Note: compared with the same group before treatment, ∗p < 0.05.
Comparison of VAS scores and Lysholm scores between the two groups (, point).
| Groups |
| VAS | Lysholm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 6.32 ± 1.04 | 1.84 ± 0.14∗ | 48.94 ± 4.43 | 78.42 ± 6.57∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 6.29 ± 1.01 | 2.96 ± 0.23∗ | 49.32 ± 4.52 | 68.34 ± 5.77∗ |
|
| / | 0.113 | 22.783 | 0.329 | 6.314 |
|
| / | 0.910 | <0.001 | 0.743 | <0.001 |
Note: compared with the same group before treatment, ∗p < 0.05.
Comparison of the incidence of refracture between the two groups (%).
| Groups |
| Number of refractures | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 2 | 6.7 |
| Control group | 30 | 8 | 26.7 |
|
| / | 4.320 | |
|
| / | 0.038 | |