| Literature DB >> 31815147 |
Sahar Mohsin1, Suneesh Kaimala1, Jens Jolly Sunny1, Ernest Adeghate1, Eric Mensah Brown1.
Abstract
T2DM is linked to an increase in the fracture rate as compared to the nondiabetic population even with normal or raised bone mineral density (BMD). Hence, bone quality plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skeletal fragility due to T2DM. This study analyzed the changes in the trabecular bone microstructure due to T2DM at various time points in ovariectomized and nonovariectomized rats. Animals were divided into four groups: (I) control (sham), (II) diabetic (sham), (III) ovariectomized, and (IV) ovariectomized with diabetes. The trabecular microarchitecture of the femoral head was characterized using a micro-CT. The differences between the groups were analyzed at 8, 10, and 14 weeks of the onset of T2DM using a two-way analysis of variance and by post hoc multiple comparisons. The diabetic group with and without ovariectomies demonstrated a significant increase in trabecular separation and a decrease in bone volume fraction, trabecular number, and thickness. BMD decreased in ovariectomized diabetic animals at 14 weeks of the onset of T2DM. No significant change was found in connectivity density and degree of anisotropy among groups. The structural model index suggested a change towards a weaker rod-like microstructure in diabetic animals. The data obtained suggested that T2DM affects the trabecular structure within a rat's femoral heads negatively and changes are most significant at a longer duration of T2DM, increasing the risk to hip fractures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31815147 PMCID: PMC6878775 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3876957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Figure 1Plots of changes in various structural parameters of trabecular bone: (a) bone volume/total volume BV/TV, (b) bone surface density (BS/TV), (c) trabecular number (Tb.N), (d) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (e) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), (f) mean 1 (vBMD), (g) structural model index (SMI), (h) connectivity density (Conn-Dens), and (i) degree of anisotropy (DA) of a rat's femur head from Gp. I—control/sham-operated, Gp. II—sham-T2DM, Gp. III—OVX, and Gp. IV—T2DM+OVX which were compared over the period of 8, 10, and 14 weeks of onset of diabetes. Two-way ANOVA was performed with Bonferroni's posttest multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 5. Adjusted p value (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Error bars = mean ± SD.
Figure 2Representation of 3D microarchitecture of the trabecular bone at the head of the femur from 12 rats from four groups: Gp. I—control/sham-operated, Gp. II—sham-T2DM, Gp. III—OVX, and Gp. IV—T2DM+OVX obtained by micro-CT examination at 6, 8, and 10 weeks after surgery.
| VOX BV/TV (%) | |||
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.09 |
| Gp. II | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.06a | 0.47 ± 0.06b |
| Gp. III | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.00 |
| Gp. IV | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.04c,d |
a% difference to Gp. I (-23.80) (∗p < 0.05). b% difference to Gp. I (-24.1) (∗p < 0.05). c% difference to Gp. III (-25.3) (∗p < 0.05). d% difference to Gp. III (-30.15) (∗∗p < 0.01).
| TRI-BS/TV (mm−1) | |||
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 14.69 ± 1.02 | 14.21 ± 1.14 | 12.88 ± 0.86 |
| Gp. II | 14.77 ± 0.74 | 13.93 ± 0.47 | 14.07 ± 0.35 |
| Gp. III | 14.02 ± 1.30 | 13.33 ± 0.62 | 15.00 ± 1.22a |
| Gp. IV | 15.14 ± 1.11 | 14.90 ± 1.91 | 13.67 ± 0.32 |
a% difference to Gp. I (16.52) (∗p < 0.05).
| DT-TB.N (1/mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 7.35 ± 0.54 | 7.25 ± 0.52 | 6.47 ± 0.27 |
| Gp. II | 8.01 ± 0.72 | 6.48 ± 0.07a | 6.37 ± 0.11b |
| Gp. III | 7.07 ± 0.94 | 6.57 ± 0.60 | 7.83 ± 0.61c,d,e |
| Gp. IV | 7.06 ± 0.53 | 7.13 ± 0.49 | 6.08 ± 0.41 |
a% difference to Gp. I (21.02) (p < 0.05). b% difference to 8 weeks in Gp. II (-19.10) (p < 0.05). c% difference to 8 weeks in Gp. II (-20.47) (p < 0.05). d% difference to Gp. II (22.91) (p < 0.01). e% difference to Gp. IV (28.78) (p < 0.01).
| DT-Tb.Th ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| Gp. II | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.00a |
| Gp. III | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| Gp. IV | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.00b |
a% difference to Gp. I (-20) (p < 0.05). b% difference to Gp. I (-20) (p < 0.05).
| DT-Tb.Sp ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Gp. II | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.00a,b | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Gp. III | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00c,d,e |
| Gp. IV | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
a% difference to Gp. I (20) (p < 0.05). b% difference to Gp. I (-25) (p < 0.05). c% difference to 8 weeks in Gp. II (20) (p < 0.05). d% difference to Gp. II (33) (p < 0.01). e% difference to Gp. IV (44) (p < 0.001).
| Mean 1/v BMD | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 713.91 ± 28.29 | 733.09 ± 45.67 | 703.05 ± 100.41 |
| Gp. II | 723.56 ± 80.66 | 601.41 ± 57.03a | 615.87 ± 45.78 |
| Gp. III | 679.41 ± 30.16 | 678.59 ± 87.01 | 740.24 ± 10.18 |
| Gp. IV | 607.56 ± 45.38 | 649.28 ± 76.17 | 558.88 ± 43.70b,c |
a% difference to Gp. I (-17.97) (p < 0.05). b% difference to Gp. I (-20.5) (p < 0.05). c% difference to Gp. III (-24.5) (p < 0.01).
| TRI-SMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | ‐2.52 ± 0.67 | ‐3.44 ± 1.64 | ‐2.53 ± 1.52 |
| Gp. II | ‐3.45 ± 1.95a | ‐1.42 ± 0.75 | ‐1.77 ± 0.48 |
| Gp. III | ‐2.02 ± 0.85 | ‐2.22 ± 1.43 | ‐3.44 ± 0.10b |
| Gp. IV | ‐1.05 ± 0.68 | ‐1.70 ± 1.35 | ‐0.46 ± 0.42 |
a% difference to Gp. IV (-69) (p < 0.05). b% difference to Gp. IV (-86) (p < 0.05).
| Conn-Dens | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks | 10 weeks | 14 weeks | |
| Gp. I | 239.30 ± 60.24 | 238.45 ± 183.92 | 163.451 ± 112.91 |
| Gp. II | 217.70 ± 54.22 | 177.56 ± 47.33 | 138.773 ± 8.98 |
| Gp. III | 217.53 ± 88.57 | 160.22 ± 31.02 | 176.888 ± 50.66 |
| Gp. IV | 270.09 ± 103.62 | 308.704 ± 201.93 | 223.662 ± 18.52 |