| Literature DB >> 35692290 |
Dawei Wei1,2, Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza3, Xingping Wang1,2, Rajwali Khan4, Zhaoxiong Lei1, Guijie Zhang1,2, Jiupan Zhang5, Zhuoma Luoreng1,2, Yun Ma1,2, Muna O Alamoudi6, Bandar Hamad Aloufi6, Ahmed Mohajja Alshammari6, Ayman Hassan Abd El-Aziz7, Majid Alhomrani8,9, Abdulhakeem S Alamri8,9.
Abstract
As a member of the large tumor suppressor (LATS) gene family, LATS1 plays an important role in regulating muscle growth and development. In this study, we determined the distinct exhibit patterns of tissue expression of bovine LATS1. Further, we determined the functional proximal minimal promoter of bovine LATS1 and identified the key transcription factors in the core promoter region to elucidate its molecular regulation mechanism. The results showed that bovine LATS1 was highly expressed in the longissimus thoracis and upregulation in infancy muscle. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay in combination with site-directed mutation and small interfering RNA (siRNA) interference demonstrated that myogenic differentiation 1 (Myod1) and myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) binding in the core promoter region (-298/-123 bp) play important roles in the transcriptional regulation of the bovine LATS1 promoter. Taken together, these interactions provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms of LATS1 transcription in mediating skeletal muscle growth in cattle.Entities:
Keywords: LATS1 gene; core promoter; expression; factor; transcription
Year: 2022 PMID: 35692290 PMCID: PMC9185948 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.853819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Primers utilized in this study.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | GAPDH | F:CCAACGTGTCTGTTGTGGAT | 60.0 | 80 | 320–521 | NM_001034034.2 |
| R:CTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGA | ||||||
| F:GTTGGTAGGACAGCCGCCTTTC | 60.0 | 96 | 3,310–3,406 | NM_001192866.1 | ||
| Promotercloning | F:CGACTGAGCGACTGAACTGAAG | 65.5 | 1,950 | −1,783/+167 | NC_037336.1 | |
| F: | 64.0 | 1,950 | −1,783/+167 | |||
| F: | 61.5 | 1,616 | −1,449/+167 | |||
| F: | 63.5 | 1,316 | −1,149/+167 | |||
| F: | 65.0 | 1,004 | −837/+167 | |||
| F: | 61.5 | 722 | −555/+167 | |||
| F: | 62.0 | 465 | −298/+167 | |||
| F: | 59.5 | 290 | −123/+167 | |||
| R: | +167 | |||||
| Site-mutand EMSA | Myod1 forward | AGAGGGCAACTCA | ||||
| Myod1 reverse | TTTCTCAGAAGGAAACA | |||||
| mMyod1 forward | AGAGGGCAACTCA | |||||
| mMyod1 reverse | TTTCTCAGAAGGAAACA | |||||
| MEF2A forward | GCATCTTTTATTCTA | |||||
| MEF2A reverse | CTCTTTCTGTGGCCG | |||||
| mMEF2A forward | GCATCTTTTATTCTA | |||||
| mMEF2A reverse | CTCTTTCTGTGGCCG | |||||
| ChIP | ChIP-Myod1 | F: GCAAAATTCTAGTTATTTCAAAGTC | 126 | −290/−165 | ||
| ChIP-MEF2A | F: ACTCCTTCGGATACGCATCTT | 100 | −188/−89 | |||
| ChIP-control | F: TGGTTATACAAGCTCTTCAGA | 137 | 18,978/19114 | 3 |
The forward (F) and reverse (R) primers for promoter cloning and the italicized letters indicate the enzyme cutting sites (KpnI and BglII). The underlined bases are core putative transcription factor binding sites.
Figure 1Expression pattern analysis of the bovine large tumor suppressor 1 (LATS1). (A) Analysis of the bovine LATS1 expression pattern in tissues and organs. (B) Expression pattern of the bovine LATS1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in longissimus thoracis at different developmental stages. The value of each column represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Different uppercases and lowercases represent p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 2Structural characteristics of the bovine LATS1 gene. (A) The detailed genomic, mRNA, and protein components are containing the 5′/3′-untranslated region (5′/3′-UTR) and the open reading frame (ORF). (B) 5′-regulatory region sequence of the bovine LATS1 gene. Arrows mark the transcription initiation sites. The transcription factor binding sites are boxed. (C) Dashed lines indicate the GC percentage as represented on the y-axis and the x-axis denotes the bp position in the 5'-untranslated region. Coordinates are given relative to the translational start site (shown as + 1).
Figure 3The construction of LATS1 protein phylogenetic tree. On the left side, there is the clustering of LATS1 protein in different species and on the right side, there is the architecture and characteristics of LATS1 protein amino acid length in corresponding species.
Figure 4Isolation and analysis of the functional proximal minimal promoter of LATS1. A series of plasmids containing 5' unidirectional deletions of the promoter region of the LATS1 gene fused in-frame to the luciferase gene were transfected into myoblasts and myotube cells. The results are expressed as the means ± SD in arbitrary units based on the firefly/Renilla luciferase activity in triplicate transfections. “*” p < 0.05 and “**” p < 0.01.
Figure 5Analysis of transcriptional activity for the corresponding transcription factor in Qinchuan cattle myoblast cells (QCMCs). (A) Site-directed mutagenesis for homeobox A5 (HOXA5), myogenic differentiation 1 (Myod1), forkhead box O1 (FoxO1), and myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) sites were carried out in the construct pGL−298/+167. The correspondence constructs were transiently transfected into QCMCs and pGL−123/+167 construct was used as a negative control. (B) Myod1 and MEF2A knockdown by small interfering RNA (siRNA) co-transfected with pGL−298/+167 in QCMCs. The NC siRNA was used as a negative control. The results are expressed as the means ± SD in arbitrary units based on the firefly/Renilla luciferase activity for triplicate transfections. (C) Multialignment sequence analysis of the Myod1 and MEF2A transcription factor binding sites in the promoter region of the LATS1 gene in cattle, sheep, horse, and goats. “*” p < 0.05 and “**” p < 0.01.
Figure 6Identification of Myod1 and MEF2A bind to the proximal minimal promoter of LATS1 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) in vitro. (A,B) Nuclear protein extracts were incubated with 5′-biotin-labeled probe containing the Myod1- and MEF2A-binding site in the presence or absence of competitor (lane 2), 50X mutation probe (lane 3), and 50X unlabeled probes (lane 4). The supershift assay was conducted using 10 μg of anti-Myod1 and anti-MEF2A antibodies (lane 5). The arrows mark the main complexes and supershifted, respectively.
Figure 7Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay of Myod1 and MEF2A binding to the LATS1 promoter in vivo. ChIP-PCR products of Myod1 (A) and MEF2A (B) input and immunoprecipitated were amplified and identified by 1% agarose electrophoresis from muscle. ChIP-qPCR assays detected the enrichment of DNA fragments in samples immunoprecipitated with Myod1 (C) and MEF2A (D) antibodies. We used the input was total chromatin from muscle, while the products from rabbit antiimmunoglobulin G (IgG) and an intragenic DNA fragment of LATS1 exon 3. “**” p < 0.01.
Figure 8A proposed schematic summary of the regulation of LATS1 expression by Myod1 and MEF2A transcription factors (TFs).