Clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatment performed by endodontic postgraduate students: a retrospective study.

Objectives: Regenerative endodontic treatment is a clinical procedure aimed at biologically regenerating damaged root canal tissue of immature permanent teeth. This study aimed to report the outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatment performed by endodontic postgraduate students. Materials and
Methods: Clinical and radiographic data of 27 patients, aged 10-22 years, who underwent regenerative treatment of immature permanent teeth from 2015 to 2019 were followed up, wherein clinical and radiographic examinations were performed for each patient. Postoperative success rate and tooth survival were analyzed, and the postoperative radiographic root area changes were quantified.
Results: A total of 23 patients attended the dental appointments, showing that all teeth survived and were asymptomatic. Specifically, 7 periapical pathosis cases were completely healed, 12 were incompletely healed, and 4 cases failed. Moreover, significant differences were found between discolored and non-discolored teeth, and between the presence or absence of periapical radiolucency. Additionally, 3 anterior teeth showed complete closure of the apical foramen, while the apical foramen width was reduced in 17 teeth and failed in 3 teeth. Root length was also found to have been increased in 7 anterior and 4 posterior teeth, and the average length ranged from 4.00-0.63 mm in the anterior teeth, 2.85-1.48 mm of the mesial root, and 2.73-2.16 mm of the molar teeth distal root. Furthermore, calcified tissue deposition was observed in 7 teeth. Conclusions: A favorable outcome of regenerative endodontic treatment of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp was achieved with a high survival rate.

INTRODUCTION

Dealing with a necrotic immature tooth with apical periodontitis is usually difficult and challenging. The traditional apexification technique has several potential drawbacks and the conventional endodontic therapy cannot be consistently achieved [1]. Regenerative endodontics has been proposed as a favored alternative treatment option to manage such cases.

Regenerative endodontic therapy is a clinical procedure that treats teeth with the necrotic pulp of immature roots, with or without the apical disease. The therapy is defined as a biologically based procedure designed to replace damaged structures, including dentin and pulp-dentin complex cells [2]. Moreover, it uses the concept of tissue engineering to restore the root canals to a healthy state, allowing for continued development of the root and surrounding tissue, as well as increased dentinal wall thickness and apical closure [345].

The clinical protocol for regenerative endodontic therapy “revascularization” was introduced, wherein bleeding is stimulated from the periapical tissues after performing a modified disinfection technique, forming a blood clot within the canal. This is hypothesized to provide a scaffold, growth factors, and possibly stem cells that support continued root formation [367].

Although most studies have shown that regenerative endodontic therapy has the potential to promote canal wall thickening and continued root development (secondary goal), these observations are not always predictable [89]. Various techniques have been described with conflicting results of the success and survival of the studied teeth [10]. Additionally, even if the collected outcomes of regenerative endodontic therapy and those performed by the faculties with or without postgraduate residents have been reported, resident cases alone have only been evaluated in a few unpublished studies [91112131415]. Therefore, this study aimed to report the outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatment performed by endodontic postgraduate students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study was approved by the Scientific Research and Ethics Committee, IRB approval number RC/IRB/2019/221. The records of 27 patients aged from 10 to 22 years old who underwent revascularization treatment of immature permanent teeth at the College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, which were performed by endodontic postgraduate students from 2015 to 2019, were retrieved using the University Clinical Electronic System. None of the personal information of the patient was revealed in accordance with the regulations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability.

Regenerative endodontic therapy clinical protocols were standardized at the university clinics. The procedure is based on the recommendations of the American Association of Endodontics [16]. It was done in 2–3 visits under aseptic conditions. The canal was irrigated with 20 mL of 1.5% sodium hypochlorite after accessing the pulp chamber and working length determination followed by saline and/or EDTA with minimal or no instrumentation. The canals were filled with calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament and the access cavity was sealed with glass ionomer filling material (GC Fuji II LC, GC America, Alsip, IL, USA). Triple antibiotic paste (400 mg of metronidazole, 250 mg of ciprofloxacin, and 50 mg of minocycline mixed in the proportion of 1:1) was used in one case only. Genteel laceration of the apical tissue to induce bleeding into the canal was done and a double seal of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA; ProRoot, Dentsply Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used as capping material. The access cavity was closed with permanent resin restoration (Dentsply Spectrum, Jacksonville, FL, USA). All cases were performed under the supervision of the endodontic staff.

Afterwards, the patient records were reviewed, using a special form (one for each tooth) to collect the required information. Then, age, sex, medical status, and reason for revascularization treatment were collected. Moreover, pulpal and periapical diagnosis, type of treatment performed, history, and any complications that occurred during or after treatment, were documented.

Following data collection, the clinical database query was reviewed for follow-up eligibility using the following specific inclusion criteria:

1. Revascularization treatment, radiographic, and restorative records.

2. Treatment, which was done for at least 6 months.

3. Non-vital immature tooth.

4. Treatment performed by a postgraduate student.

Cases with missing information, incomplete records, and treatments performed by undergraduate students or university dental staff were excluded.

Each patient was called for a follow-up appointment and informed about the importance of the visit and the steps to be performed, whereas non-responders were contacted again to encourage them to attend. Each patient was allotted 15–20 minutes for the clinical examinations of the following: clinical signs and symptoms, coronal restoration status, and gingival and periodontal condition. A radiograph of the involved tooth was taken and evaluated for the presence or absence of periapical radiolucency, resorption, calcification, and radiographic root dimension changes, wherein the apical foramen width and root length were measured from both the preoperative and recall radiographic images using the Sidex radiographic program (Dentsply, Sirona, NC, USA). Moreover, radiographic periapical pathosis changes were checked, on the basis of clinical and radiographic finding evaluations depending on both survival (retention of the tooth in its socket at the time of the follow-up visit) and success using criteria from Alobaid et al. [8], Saoud et al. [12] and Jeeruphan et al. [17].

To quantify radiographic root dimension changes, the radiographic root area, apical foramen width, and root length were measured using both the preoperative and recall radiographs. The technique of Alobaid et al. [8] was followed using the ImageJ software program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The preoperative and postoperative radiographic images were opened in the ImageJ software program, and then were aligned using the TurboReg plugin to minimize any dimensional changes. After alignment, the radiographic root area, root length, and root width were measured. Every measurement was completed in duplicate and averaged. In case of distortion problems between the 2 radiographs, a new exposure is taken or uses those films taken during early follow-up.

Treatment outcomes were assessed using the criteria of Bukhari et al. [13], which consisted of the following categories:

1. Complete healing; no clinical signs and symptoms, complete resolution of apical radiolucency, increased root and apical closure width/length.

2. Incomplete healing; no clinical signs and symptoms, the periapical lesion completely healed without any changes in terms of root maturation or thickening, periapical radiolucency size is reduced or unchanged with/without increasing root dentin thickness/length radiographic signs, or apical closure.

3. Failure; persistent clinical signs and symptoms, persistent or increased peripheral radiolucency size with no apical closure.

The operator reviewed the history and data records of the entire revascularization treatment, and 2 qualified endodontists reviewed the clinical and radiographic examination results using a data collection form for each case. Preoperative and postoperative factors were evaluated for each tooth, and outcome assessment was reviewed, jointly reassessing the disagreement between the evaluators.

Statistical analysis

The data were collected, tabulated, and analyzed using the IBM SPSS software package version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The McNemar and χ2 for the goodness of fit tests were used to compare the proportion of cases with or without periapical radiolucency and with or without apical foramen closure on follow-up from 6 to 36 months versus the baseline proportion of cases. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability was measured using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ). All tests were interpreted at a 5% significance level (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Of the 27 recalled patients, only 23 attended follow-up examinations, wherein the number of male patients (55.56%) was higher than that of female patients. The average follow-up time was 20 months for anterior and 17 months for posterior teeth. The patient demographics and baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Anterior tooth trauma was the most common etiological factor of the disease as compared to posterior tooth caries, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.411). Asymptomatic apical periodontitis was 70.37% of the cases. The number of anterior teeth that received regenerative endodontic treatment was almost similar to that of the posterior teeth (Table 1).

Table 1

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics of the collected cases (n = 27)

Characteristics		Teeth (%)	p value
Sex			0.411
	Male	15 (55.56)
	Female	12 (44.44)
Etiology			0.411
	Caries	12 (44.44)
	Trauma*	15 (55.56)
Tooth type			0.784
	Anterior	14 (51.85)
	Posterior	13 (48.15)
Tooth location			0.784
	Mandibular	13 (48.15)
	Maxillary	14 (51.85)
Pulp diagnosis
	Necrotic†	27 (100)
Periapical diagnosis			0.000
	Asymptomatic apical periodontitis	19 (70.37)
	Symptomatic apical periodontitis	7 (25.93)
	Chronic apical abscess	1 (3.70)

*One tooth had avulsion and one had cervical root resorption; †Three teeth failed the vital pulp therapy and was diagnosed with pulp necrosis.

The observation period ranged from 6–36 months, and inter-and intra-examiner agreements were κ = 0.75 and 0.8, respectively.

Clinical and radiographic findings of the evaluated cases are summarized in Table 2, showing significant differences between discolored and non-discolored teeth and the presence and absence of periapical radiolucency (p = 0.0001).

Table 2

Clinical and radiographic findings of the evaluated cases (n = 23)

Characteristics		Teeth (%)	p value
Crown discoloration			0.0001
	Discolored	7 (30.43)
	No discoloration	16 (69.57)
Coronal restoration			0.019
	Good (intact)	11 (47.80)
	Poor (open margin, recurrent caries, temporary filling)	10 (43.50)
	None	2 (8.70)
Periapical radiolucency			0.0001
	Absent	7 (30.43)
	Present	16 (69.57)
Calcification			0.000
	Intracanal	5 (21.74)
	Apical	2 (8.70)

All treated teeth were found to be asymptomatic before and after treatment, and they had survived during the follow-up period. Specifically, 7 cases (30.43%) healed completely and were considered successful (Figure 1), 12 cases had incomplete healing (52.17%) (Figure 2), and 4 cases failed (17.4%) (Figure 3).

Figure 1

Maxillary left central incisor with open apex and apical radiolucency due to trauma (A-C). Calcium hydroxide was used as an intracanal medicament and the access was filled with mineral trioxide aggregate. 31-month postoperative radiographic follow-up shows complete apical closure, an increase in the tooth length, and healed (complete) apical radiolucency (D-F).

Figure 2

Mandibular left the second molar of 13-years old female patient with the open apex of both mesial and distal root and apical radiolucency due to caries. Calcium hydroxide was used as an intracanal medicament and the access and part of the canals were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (A-C). 9 months post-operative radiograph shows complete apical closure of the distal root and reduction of the apical foramen width of the mesial root regardless of the increased apical radiolucency (D-F).

Figure 3

Maxillary left central incisor of 11-years old male patient with open apex and no apical radiolucency due to trauma. Calcium hydroxide was used as an intracanal medicament and the access and part of the canals were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (A). The 6-months (B) and 12-months (C, D) post-operative radiograph shows the development of periapical radiolucency and the apical foramen failed to close.

Periapical radiolucency was seen in 4 teeth (failed cases) and was reduced in size in 12 teeth (incomplete healing cases). Additionally, canal calcification was observed in 7 cases (Table 2).

The distribution of complete healing, incomplete healing, and failure within trauma (4, 7, and 3, respectively) were significantly different (p = 0.023). Meanwhile, the distribution of complete healing, incomplete healing, and failure were 3, 5, and 1, respectively, within caries (p = 0.002). However, the association between healing status and patient characteristics (caries, trauma, and dens vaginitis) was not significant (Fisher exact p = 0.501), meaning that the healing status pattern or the distribution of caries and trauma were the same (Table 3).

Table 3

Relationship between post-treatment healing status (outcome) and patient characteristics/tooth type

Characteristic/Tooth type (Etiology)	Healing status				p value
	Complete	Incomplete	Failure	Total	t-test	Fisher’s exact test*
Trauma (anterior)	4 (28.6)	7 (50)	3 (21.4)	14 (100)	0.023†	0.501*
Caries (posterior)	3 (33.3)	5 (55.6)	1 (11.1)	9 (100)	0.002†
Total	7	12	4	23

*Fisher’s exact test was used to test the association between etiology levels and Healing status in place of χ2 test, sense χ2 not failed to be used (there was more than 20% of expected cells had less than 5 observations then merging cells was done); †Proportions t-test or multinomial test was used to compare healing status levels within each etiology levels (trauma and caries).

Moreover, the distribution of complete healing, incomplete healing, and failure within the anterior teeth (4, 7, and 3, respectively) was significantly different (p = 0.023). On the other hand, the distribution of complete healing, incomplete healing, and failure (3, 5, and 1, respectively) within the posterior teeth was also significantly different (p = 0.002). Despite these findings, the association between healing status and tooth type (anterior and posterior) was not significant (Fisher exact p = 0.502), indicating that the healing status pattern or the distribution for the anterior and posterior regions were the same (Table 3).

The changes in root dimension, length, and apical foramen width of the recalled teeth are listed in Tables 4 and 5. Exactly 3 anterior teeth showed complete apical foramen closure, while the apical foramen width was reduced in 17 teeth and failed in 3 teeth. Root length was increased in 7 anterior and 4 posterior teeth, with an average length ranging from 4.00–0.63 mm in the anterior teeth, 2.85–1.48 mm of the mesial root, and 2.73–2.16 mm of the molar teeth distal roots.

Table 4

Changes of root length and apical foramen width of anterior teeth

Case	Tooth	Sex	Age	Root dimensions (mm)		Root length (mm)		Apical foramen width (mm)
				Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
1	21	Female	14	Middle 4.50	4.74	25.24	25.87	1.31	0.00
				Apical 3.68	3.68
3	11	Male	11	Middle 4.81	4.80	25.24	28.98	2.53	0.00
				Apical 3.91	3.30
4	21	Male	11	Middle 4.92	4.92	22.82	25.51	1.66	2.90
				Apical 4.09	3.78
5	11	Male	17	Middle 5.73	5.19	29.04	23.61	1.52	1.37
				Apical 4.16	3.65
8	11	Male	10	Middle 6.14	6.26	21.40	23.55	4.00	2.02
				Apical 5.07	4.67
9	21	Male	12	Middle 5.31	5.33	22.62	26.62	1.75	0.00
				Apical 4.06	3.87
11	21	Female	19	Middle 5.07	4.20	20.02	17.32	2.34	2.18
				Apical 3.59	3.21
12	11	Female	22	Middle 4.72	4.68	18.46	18.12	2.15	2.69
				Apical 3.92	4.02
13	11	Male	10	Middle 6.20	5.60	26.16	25.04	3.42	3.31
				Apical 5.05	4.40
16	11	Female	12	Middle 4.46	4.28	19.58	18.49	0.70	0.38
				Apical 3.21	3.54
17	21	Female	30	Middle 5.80	6.10	28.46	28.66	1.57	0.80
				Apical 4.27	4.36
21	21	Male	17	Middle 5.29	4.60	26.36	25.74	2.82	2.41
				Apical 4.05	3.40
22	11	Female	14	Middle 4.50	4.38	19.88	19.49	0.60	0.34
				Apical 3.39	3.57

Tooth type is based on the 2-digit Federation Dentaire Internationale numbering system.

Table 5

Changes of root length and apical foramen width of posterior teeth

Case	Tooth	Sex	Age	Root dimensions (mm)			Root length (mm)		Apical foramen width (mm)
				Before		After	Before	After	Before	After
2	36	Female	14	Mesial root			Mesial 10.62	12.40	0.49	0.52
					Middle 2.51	2.44
					Apical 2.26	2.31
				Distal root			Distal 9.92
					Middle 2.84	2.71
					Apical 2.35	2.23		12.08	0.89	0.77
6	37	Female	13	Mesial root			Mesial 17.74	19.22	1.32	1.24
					Middle 2.08	2.31
					Apical 1.87	2.34
				Distal root			Distal 18.66
					Middle 3.09	3.03
					Apical 2.35	2.23		21.39	1.27	0.55
7	46	Male	13	Mesial root			Mesial 17.15	16.92	0.88	0.57
					Middle 1.76	1.65
					Apical 1.54	1.82
				Distal root			Distal 18.84
					Middle 3.07	2.28
					Apical 2.36	2.31		18.69	1.58	0.44
10	47	Male	13	Mesial root			Mesial 17.22	16.29	0.93	0.66
					Middle 2.38	2.95
					Apical 2.28	2.95
				Distal root			Distal 17.04
					Middle 2.36	3.07
					Apical 2.72	2.44		14.85	1.11	0.48
14	46	Female	10	Mesial root			Mesial 17.09	19.94	1.11	0.62
					Middle 2.35	1.83
					Apical 2.09	1.83
				Distal root			Distal 16.64
					Middle 2.84	2.74
					Apical 3.06	2.05		16.40	1.64	0.00
15	46	Female	10	Mesial root			Mesial 17.10	19.95	1.10	0.60
					Middle 2.33	1.81
					Apical 2.09	1.83
				Distal root			Distal 16.74
					Middle 2.84	2.74
					Apical 3.05	2.05		16.50	1.60	0.00
18	45	Male	14	Middle 5.44		5.67	19.52	20.10	1.28	0.56
				Apical 4.74		4.76
19	24	Male	14	Middle 3.72		3.90	17.21	17.22	0.82	0.81
				Apical 2.78		2.87
20	46	Female	10	Mesial root			Mesial 17.09	16.92	1.11	1.56
					Middle 2.35	1.95
					Apical 2.09	1.78
				Distal root			Distal 16.47
					Middle 3.38	2.48
					Apical 3.06	2.05		16.23	1.22	1.36
23	46	Female	10	Mesial root			Mesial 17.09	17.22	1.67	2.24
					Middle 2.64	1.76
					Apical 2.39	1.68
				Distal root			Distal 15.68
					Middle 3.87	2.65
					Apical 3.17	2.13		15.42	1.37	1.55

Tooth type is based on the 2-digit Federation Dentaire Internationale numbering system.

DISCUSSION

Immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp secondary to trauma or caries are difficult to manage due to thin dentinal root walls that may fracture during or after treatment. Moreover, the absence of apical stops makes it difficult to fill the canal using traditional root canal filling materials. As a way to circumvent this, these teeth are currently managed by regenerative endodontic treatment, which allows the continued development of the root [4]. Infection control and blood clot formation are essential for connective tissue healing at the immature tooth apex, wherein blood clot formation in the root canal space seems to be organized by granulation tissue growth from the periapical area [18].

Kappa (κ) test was used to test the agreement between observer 1 and observer 2 and κ = 0.81 greater than 0.7 with p value = 0.000. Also, the intra-examiner was measured by measuring the agreement between the same observer twice in time and κ was 0.78 greater than 0.7 with p value = 0.000. The Kappa scores were considered very good following the criteria of Landis and Koch [19]. These results are almost similar to those of Jeeruphan et al. [17] and are better than those of Kahler et al. [11] who reported moderate reliability (0.46).

The number of teeth evaluated in the present study was low, which is similar to those in previously published retrospective cohort studies [811141517]. Additionally, all evaluated teeth, including those of patients who did not attend follow-up, survived (100%) during the follow-up period, which is in accordance with the findings of Saoud et al. [12], Bukhari et al. [13], Chatha [14], Jeeruphan et al. [17], and Cehreli et al. [20].

Regarding periapical pathosis, 7 cases (30.43%) were completely healed and 12 cases revealed enhanced but incomplete healing (52.17%), which gives a success rate prediction of 82.6% using the condition’s more lenient definition [21]. Given that all patients were free of clinical signs and symptoms, the chance of complete resolution in periapical pathosis cases that falls in the category of complete healing is reasonably high with a good chance for the tooth to remain asymptomatic and functional over time, provided that the tooth is well restored [21]. A study by Strindberg [22] further considered the absence of periapical radiolucency as a well-established measure of favorable healing outcomes. The pathological apical microenvironment can reserve its hard tissue formation ability, albeit to some degree and in a disturbed manner [23]. As a result, periapical pathosis might heal with fibrous periapical tissue (apical scar), showing bony trabeculation reduction or no changes with the tooth as it remains asymptomatic [2425]. Based on previous studies, Kahler et al. [11] reported the resolution of periapical radiolucency in 90.3% of treated teeth, and Shah et al. [26] reported a resolution of 78%. In comparison, the findings of the present study (82.6%) fell between. Furthermore, Kahler et al. [11] suggested no further treatment in teeth with evidence of resolution of periapical pathology, even if no further root maturation has occurred.

The success rate of the present study was similar to that of Sedwick [15], but it was slightly lower compared to those of Saoud et al. [12], Jeeruphan et al. [17], and Cehreli et al. [20]. A high rate of clinical success (78% and 100%) and radiographic periapical lesion healing (93% and 100%) subsequent to regenerative treatment of immature teeth have been reported by several investigators [81727]. However, a systemic review of the outcomes of this treatment reported a high number of failures (approximately 39%) 2 years after treatment initiation, which was due to tooth discoloration, fracture, signs of periapical pathosis, and presence of clinical symptoms [28]. Moreover, these studies vary depending on the type of study conducted as well as the factors that were considered to assess the success and failure outcomes [817272829]. This variation in the success and failure rates of the published reports could be attributed to several reasons as summarized by Almutairi et al. [28] and Lee et al. [30]: 1) no standardized technique was followed; 2) inadequate disinfection protocol; 3) insufficient healing process knowledge; and 4) type of scaffolds used.

Two retrospective studies were done evaluating endodontists and endodontic residents. Bukhari et al. [13] evaluated the outcome of 28 revascularized necrotic immature teeth of residents and faculty members at the University of Pennsylvania. Twenty-one (75%) healed completely, 4 cases (14%) presented with incomplete healing completely and 3 cases (10.7%) failed. Chatha [14] conducted a master thesis evaluating 28 cases treated by regenerative endodontic procedure that was performed by Endodontists (21 cases) and endodontic residents (7 cases). The absence of clinical symptoms and resolution of apical pathosis were shown in 27 cases (96.4%) at one-year follow-up; root width was increased in 19 cases (67.9%) and the root length was increased in15 cases (53.6%). The results of the current study cannot be compared to Bukhari et al. [13] and Chatha [14]. All cases of the current study were treated by Endodontic residents following a standardized regenerative procedure where the cases of faculty members and residents were not identified in Bukhari et al. [13] and the results of the Endodontic residents were not identified as well as clinical procedure followed in Chatha [14] was not standardized.

The evaluated patients in the present study were young (mean age: 13-years). According to Sonoyama et al. [31], young patients may play a role in tooth regenerative potential through the stem cell population. This is related to the apical opening size, which allows vital tissue ingrowth and eventually leads to a successful outcome of the regenerative endodontic procedure. It has been reported that an apical opening greater than 1 mm is sufficient for successful revascularization; however, a smaller size (0.5 mm) did not prevent vital tissue ingrowth into the pulp space [532]. In comparison, almost all of the recalled cases in the present study had an apical foramen greater than 1 mm in diameter. In the current study, apical foramen size reduction of the recalled anterior teeth was observed in 11 out of 13 cases, occurring was more in the distal root than the mesial of the molar teeth, which could be related to the large size of the canal. Five root developmental patterns in response to regenerative endodontic therapy of immature permanent teeth with infected necrotic pulp were described by Chen et al. [9]. These types were categorized as follows: Type 1, increased canal wall thickening and continued root maturation; Type 2, no significant continuation of root development with blunting and closure of the root apex; Type 3, continued root development with the apical foramen remaining open; Type 4, severe canal space calcification (obliteration); and Type 5, a hard tissue barrier formed in the canal between the coronal MTA plug and the root apex. All of these types were observed in the current study, except for Type 4, which pertains to mild to moderate calcification (Figure 4). In the current study, the root length was increased in 5 anterior and 2 posterior teeth, with an average length ranging from 4.00–0.63 mm in the anterior teeth, 2.85–1.48 mm of the mesial, and 2.73–2.16 mm of the distal of the molar teeth roots. These findings have been reported by several researchers. Specifically, some researchers reported root development in all treated cases, and others reported this occurrence in most cases, such as 21 out of 23 by Chueh et al. [33] and 10 out of 14 by Shah et al. [26], or only a certain percentage of cases showed root length increase [2934]. One of the limitations for determining an accurate measurement is the difficulty in identifying a clear landmark [11]. In response, Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) has been used to circumvent this problem [29].

Figure 4

Root developmental patterns in response to regenerative endodontic therapy of immature permanent teeth with infected necrotic pulp described by Chen et al. [8] observed in the current study. Type 1 (A, B); Type 2 (C, D); Type 3 (E, F); Type 4 (G, H); and Type 5 (I, J).

Continued root development was reported to be due to apical cementum deposition following successful revascularization procedures in animal studies [33536]. In contrast, Chen et al. [9] believed that continued root development in humans does not appear to be a predictable outcome of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis/abscess following revascularization procedures. Yamauchi et al. [37] also reported that this is not even a constant finding in dog teeth. Furthermore, decreased root development potential might be attributed to the damaged Hertwig epithelial root sheath or the lack of remaining viable pulp tissue due to longstanding necrosis [1138]. In the present study, the failed cases were related to findings of increased periapical radiolucency size without apical closure and further root development.

Pulp canal calcification (hard tissue formation) has been reported as a result of regenerative treatment of immature permanent necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis; however, its underlying mechanism remains unclear, which might be due to the internal replacement resorption complications or intracanal hard tissue and apical bone ankylosis [9]. It was also shown histologically in animal studies and in extracted teeth of a case report that the tissues formed in the canal space are similar to cementum-like or bone-like and fibrous connective tissue [3940]. Additionally, partial pulp canal calcification was observed in only 7 teeth in the present study, with most of them having anterior teeth and a history of trauma. This finding is less reported as compared to those reported by Chueh et al. [33], who found complete and partial calcification in all of their cases. Complete calcification can be secondary to bone-like tissue as a result of internal replacement resorption or union between the intracanal hard tissue and apical alveolar bone [33]. Moreover, bridge formation at the apical third of the canal by intracanal cementum ingrowth in revascularized immature necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis was histologically demonstrated by Thibodeau et al. [3], da Silva et al. [35], and Wang et al. [36].

Crown discoloration was observed in 7 (30.43%) of the 23 teeth in the present study, which was attributed to the presence of bismuth oxide in the MTA material. The primary causative factor was attributed to the interaction of this component with tooth tissue collagen and sodium hypochlorite, as well as placing the MTA above the cementoenamel junction. Additionally, the use of triple antibiotic paste containing minocycline has long been known to stain dentin [344142]. Calcium hydroxide and MTA were used in all cases in the current study, and triple antibiotic paste was used in one case only. It should also be noted that although triple antibiotic paste is a very effective antimicrobial agent, high concentrations of this mixture might have a detrimental effect on stem cell survival [43].

Placement of a tight coronal seal is also important for the successful outcome of regenerative endodontic treatment, wherein a double seal consisting of MTA over the blood clot and permanent resin restoration has been used in most studies [424445]. A similar technique was used for all evaluated cases in the present study, and coronal restoration was lost in only one case.

Despite all the findings of the study, the low number of cases was considered a limitation, which could be related to the number of visits that the patients needed for evaluation. Furthermore, many issues remain to be clarified in the absence of histological evidence. Although regenerative endodontic therapy appears to have a generally high clinical success rate, studies with longer follow-up periods and a large number of cases are needed to better estimate long-term success.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of the regenerative endodontic treatment of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp was very high and the clinical and radiographic outcome result of the cases was favorable.