OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo the revascularization and the apical and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using 2 techniques for root canal disinfection (apical negative pressure irrigation versus apical positive pressure irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing) in immature dogs' teeth with apical periodontitis. STUDY DESIGN: Two test groups of canals with experimentally induced apical periodontitis were evaluated according to the disinfection technique: Group 1, apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac system), and Group 2, apical positive pressure irrigation (conventional irrigation) plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing. In Group 3 (positive control), periapical lesions were induced, but no endodontic treatment was done. Group 4 (negative control) was composed of sound teeth. The animals were killed after 90 days and the maxillas and mandibles were subjected to histological processing. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Mallory Trichrome and examined under light microscopy. A description of the apical and periapical features was done and scores were attributed to the following histopathological parameters: newly formed mineralized apical tissue, periapical inflammatory infiltrate, apical periodontal ligament thickness, dentin resorption, and bone tissue resorption. Intergroup comparisons were done by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Although statistically significant difference was found only for the inflammatory infiltrate (P < .05), Group 1 presented more exuberant mineralized formations, more structured apical and periapical connective tissue, and a more advanced repair process than Group 2. CONCLUSION: From the histological observations, sodium hypochlorite irrigation with the EndoVac system can be considered as a promising disinfection protocol in immature teeth with apical periodontitis, suggesting that the use of intracanal antibiotics might not be necessary. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo the revascularization and the apical and periapical repair after endodontic treatment using 2 techniques for root canal disinfection (apical negative pressure irrigation versus apical positive pressure irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing) in immature dogs' teeth with apical periodontitis. STUDY DESIGN: Two test groups of canals with experimentally induced apical periodontitis were evaluated according to the disinfection technique: Group 1, apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac system), and Group 2, apical positive pressure irrigation (conventional irrigation) plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing. In Group 3 (positive control), periapical lesions were induced, but no endodontic treatment was done. Group 4 (negative control) was composed of sound teeth. The animals were killed after 90 days and the maxillas and mandibles were subjected to histological processing. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Mallory Trichrome and examined under light microscopy. A description of the apical and periapical features was done and scores were attributed to the following histopathological parameters: newly formed mineralized apical tissue, periapical inflammatory infiltrate, apical periodontal ligament thickness, dentin resorption, and bone tissue resorption. Intergroup comparisons were done by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Although statistically significant difference was found only for the inflammatory infiltrate (P < .05), Group 1 presented more exuberant mineralized formations, more structured apical and periapical connective tissue, and a more advanced repair process than Group 2. CONCLUSION: From the histological observations, sodium hypochlorite irrigation with the EndoVac system can be considered as a promising disinfection protocol in immature teeth with apical periodontitis, suggesting that the use of intracanal antibiotics might not be necessary. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Adel S Alobaid; Lina M Cortes; Jeffery Lo; Thuan T Nguyen; Jeffery Albert; Abdulaziz S Abu-Melha; Louis M Lin; Jennifer L Gibbs Journal: J Endod Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Tatiana M Botero; Xianli Tang; Richard Gardner; Jan C C Hu; James R Boynton; G Rex Holland Journal: J Endod Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Tarek Mohamed A Saoud; Ashraf Zaazou; Ahmed Nabil; Sybel Moussa; Louis M Lin; Jennifer L Gibbs Journal: J Endod Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Marco C Bottino; Maria T P Albuquerque; Asma Azabi; Eliseu A Münchow; Kenneth J Spolnik; Jacques E Nör; Paul C Edwards Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Hisham M El Halaby; Ashraf M Abu-Seida; Mervat I Fawzy; Mona H Farid; Hagar A Bastawy Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Lidia Regina da Costa Hidalgo; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Paulo Nelson-Filho; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Fabrício Kitazono de Carvalho; Marília Pacífico Lucisano; Arthur Belem Novaes Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.161