Literature DB >> 35690952

Randomized prospective trial of the severity of irritative symptoms after HoLEP vs ThuFLEP.

Dmitry Enikeev1, Mark Taratkin2, Diana Babaevskaya3, Andrey Morozov2, Vladislav Petov2, Roman Sukhanov2, Evgeny Shpot2, Vincent Misrai4, Denis Chinenov2, Mikhail Enikeev2, Thomas Herrmann5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term postoperative functional outcomes and severity of irritative symptoms following holmium and thulium fiber laser enucleation (HoLEP and ThuFLEP).
METHODS: This prospective randomized single-blinded study was performed in accordance with CONSORT. The inclusion criteria were IPSS > 20 or Qmax < 10 ml/s. Patients were randomized between HoLEP and ThuFLEP. Demographics, objective data (PSA, prostate volume, etc.), data on urinary and sexual function (IPSS, IIEF, QoL, QUID, Qmax, ICIQ-MLUTS) were collected. Detailed perioperative information and postoperative data on functional outcomes at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks and 6 months were collected.
RESULTS: Data on 163 participants were included (77-HoLEP, 86-ThuFLEP). No differences were found in surgery duration; number of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I-III), catheterization time and hospital stay. Functional outcomes up to 6 months didn't differ between the groups (IPPS, IIEF, QoL, QUID, ICIQ-MLUTS, Qmax, p > 0.05). Total ICIQ-MLUTS, bother and voiding scores at 1 and 3 months significantly increased compared with the baseline in both groups (p < 0.05). No difference between the groups were observed. In HoLEP the SUI series rate was 1.3% and 1.3% after 3 and 6 months following the procedure; in ThuFLEP: it was 3.5% and 2.3% respectively (p = 0.35 and p = 0.54).
CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of the study showed no apparent differences in functional outcomes (IPSS, Qmax), rate of SUI or irritative symptoms. Both ThuFLEP and HoLEP are efficient ways of treating benign prostatic obstruction. Both surgeries are comparable in terms of duration and postoperative complication rates.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate; HoLEP; Irritative symptoms; ThuFLEP; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35690952     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04046-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  23 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rebecca Tooher; Peter Sutherland; Anthony Costello; Peter Gilling; Guy Rees; Guy Maddern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Leonid Rapoport; Magomed Gazimiev; Sergey Allenov; Jasur Inoyatov; Mark Taratkin; Ekaterina Laukhtina; John M Sung; Zhamshid Okhunov; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  High-power thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary tissues at 1.94 microm.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Fried; Keith E Murray
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  En bloc and two-lobe techniques for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: retrospective comparative analysis of peri- and postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Mark Taratkin; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Tatyana Alekseeva; Olesya Snurnitsyna; Natalya Potoldykova; Andrey Gerasimov; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Retrospective Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes After Monopolar Versus Laser Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Petr Glybochko; Zhamshid Okhunov; Yuriy Alyaev; Leonid Rapoport; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Mikhail Enikeev; Nikolay Sorokin; Alim Dymov; Mark Taratkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Christopher Netsch; Leonid Rapoport; Magomed Gazimiev; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Olesya Snurnitsyna; Tatyana Alekseeva; Benedikt Becker; Mark Taratkin; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.

Authors:  Sascha A Ahyai; Peter Gilling; Steven A Kaplan; Rainer M Kuntz; Stephan Madersbacher; Francesco Montorsi; Mark J Speakman; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Karin Lehrich; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case?

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Anastasia Kovalenko; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Nina Paramonova; Leonid Spivak; Luca Johann Wachtendorf; Semil Eminovic; Andrew Sheya Afyouni; Zhamshid Okhunov; Marina Karagezyan; Vasily Mikhailov; Yuriy Strakhov; Thomas Rw Herrmann; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.