Literature DB >> 33175250

Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case?

Mark Taratkin1, Anastasia Kovalenko2, Ekaterina Laukhtina3, Nina Paramonova4, Leonid Spivak3, Luca Johann Wachtendorf5, Semil Eminovic5, Andrew Sheya Afyouni6, Zhamshid Okhunov6, Marina Karagezyan7, Vasily Mikhailov3, Yuriy Strakhov4, Thomas Rw Herrmann8,9, Dmitry Enikeev3.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the ablation, coagulation, and carbonization characteristics of the holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser and thulium fiber lasers (TFL). The Ho:YAG laser (100 W av.power), the quasi-continuous (QCW) TFL (120 W av.power), and the SuperPulsed (SP) TFL (50 W av.power) were compared on a non-frozen porcine kidney. To control the cutting speed (2 or 5 mm/s), an XY translation stage was used. The Ho:YAG was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 40 W or Pav = 70 W settings. The TFL was tested using E = 1.5 J and Pav = 30 W or Pav = 60 W settings. After ex vivo incision, histological analysis was performed in order to estimate thermal damage. At 40 W, the Ho:YAG displayed a shallower cutting at 2 and 5 mm/s (1.1 ± 0.2 mm and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, respectively) with virtually zero coagulation. While at 70 W, the minimal coagulation depth measured 0.1 ± 0.1 mm. The incisions demonstrated zero carbonization. Both the QCW and SP TFL did show effective cutting at all speeds (2.1 ± 0.2 mm and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm, respectively, at 30 W) with prominent coagulation (0.6 ± 0.1 mm and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, respectively, at 70 W) and carbonization. Our study introduced the TFL as a novel efficient alternative for soft tissue surgery to the Ho:YAG laser. The SP TFL offers a Ho:YAG-like incision, while QCW TFL allows for fast, deep, and precise cutting with increased carbonization.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ex vivo; Ho:YAG laser; Laser-tissue interactions; Thulium fiber laser

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33175250     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03189-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  5 in total

1.  Quality of life and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Reginald C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 2.  The changing role of lasers in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mark Taratkin; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Comparative Study of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate With MOSES Enabled Pulsed Laser Modulation.

Authors:  Tim Large; Charles Nottingham; Christa Stoughton; James Williams; Amy Krambeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  70 vs 120 W thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 microm continuous-wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic ex-vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Nina Huck; Felix Wezel; Axel Häcker; Andreas J Gross; Maurice Stephan Michel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited].

Authors:  Nathaniel M Fried
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.732

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey.

Authors:  Selcuk Guven; Maurizio Colecchia; Pembe Oltulu; Giulia Bonfante; Dmitry Enikeev; Hasan Esen; Thomas Herrmann; Lukas Lusuardi; Salvatore Micali; Bashkar Somani; Andreas Skolarikos; Alberto Breda; Evangelos Liatsikos; Joan Palou Redorta; Ali Serdar Gozen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Thulium Fiber Laser Behavior on Tissue During Upper- and Lower-Tract Endourology.

Authors:  Vasileios Gkolezakis; Patrick Rice; Bhaskar Kumar Somani; Theodoros Tokas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.862

3.  Randomized prospective trial of the severity of irritative symptoms after HoLEP vs ThuFLEP.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Mark Taratkin; Diana Babaevskaya; Andrey Morozov; Vladislav Petov; Roman Sukhanov; Evgeny Shpot; Vincent Misrai; Denis Chinenov; Mikhail Enikeev; Thomas Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 4.  Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Raymond Khargi; Benjamin Seiden; Areeba S Sadiq; William M Atallah; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

5.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.

Authors:  Frederic Panthier; Thibault Germain; Cyril Gorny; Laurent Berthe; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.