| Literature DB >> 35690652 |
Lina Sui1,2, Junhui Li2,3, Joshua Philp3,4, Kai Yang2,3, Yanli Wei2,3, Hongmei Li2,3, Jishun Li2,3, Ling Li2,3, Maarten Ryder3,4, Ruey Toh3,4, Yi Zhou3,4, Matthew D Denton3,4, Jindong Hu5,6, Yan Wang7.
Abstract
Fusarium crown rot and wheat sharp eyespot are major soil-borne diseases of wheat, causing serious losses to wheat yield in China. We applied high-throughput sequencing combined with qPCR to determine the effect of winter wheat seed dressing, with either Trichoderma atroviride HB20111 spore suspension or a chemical fungicide consisting of 6% tebuconazole, on the fungal community composition and absolute content of pathogens Fusarium pseudograminearum and Rhizoctonia cerealis in the rhizosphere at 180 days after planting. The results showed that the Trichoderma and chemical fungicide significantly reduced the amount of F. pseudograminearum in the rhizosphere soil (p < 0.05), and also changed the composition and structure of the fungal community. In addition, field disease investigation and yield measurement showed that T. atroviride HB20111 treatment reduced the whiteheads with an average control effect of 60.1%, 14.9% higher than the chemical treatment; T. atroviride HB20111 increased yield by 7.7%, which was slightly more than the chemical treatment. Therefore, T. atroviride HB20111 was found to have the potential to replace chemical fungicides to control an extended range of soil-borne diseases of wheat and to improve wheat yield.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35690652 PMCID: PMC9188553 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13669-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Effects of control seed dressing (Control), chemical fungicide seed dressing (Chemical) and T. atroviride HB20111 seed dressing (Trichoderma) on the copy number of targeted fungal pathogens. The copy number of total fungi (A), F. pseudograminearum (B) and R. cerealis (C).
Figure 2OTU composition analysis of wheat rhizosphere soil under the conditions of control seed dressing (Control), chemical fungicide seed dressing (Chemical) and T. atroviride HB20111 seed dressing (Trichoderma). Principal component analysis (A) and Venn distribution diagram (B).
Figure 3The diversity and richness of the fungal community in wheat rhizosphere soil under different treatments i.e. control seed dressing (Control), chemical fungicide seed dressing (Chemical) and T. atroviride HB20111 seed dressing (Trichoderma). Observed OTUs of Richness of different treatments (A) and Shannon index of different treatments (B).
Figure 4Rhizosphere fungal community structure at the phylum and genus level as affected by control seed dressing (Control), T. atroviride HB20111 seed dressing (Trichoderma), and chemical fungicide seed dressing (Chemical). Relative fungal abundance at the phylum level (A), absolute fungal abundance at the phylum level (B) and relative fungal abundance at the genus level (C). ns, not significant at p < 0.05; *Indicates significance at p < 0.05; **Indicates significance at p < 0.01 based on Games–Howell as the post hoc test and Benjamini–Hochberg FDR as the multiple test correction method.
Figure 5Network diagram of linear relationship between Trichoderma and plant pathogens. The red mark represented a positive correlation, and the blue was negative (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Impact of T. atroviride HB20111 seed dressing (Trichoderma) and chemical fungicide seed dressing (Chemical) on the targeted wheat soil-borne diseases. The disease index of wheat sharp eyespot (A); the disease index of Fusarium crown rot (B); the whiteheads rate and control efficiency of different treatments (C); the yield of different treatments (D).
Quantitative PCR primer sequences.
| Target group | Primer probe | Sequence (5′–3′) | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total fungi | ITS1F | CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA | 479 |
| ITS2R | GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC | ||
| RctubF4 | CCTAAAGAGTCTGGAGTAAGTC | 203 | |
| RctubR4 | GCTAGTGCGGTCAATGTATAG | ||
| Fp_TEF1α.2F | AAAAATTACGACAAAGCCGTAAAAA | 82 | |
| Fp_TEF1α.2R | ACTCGACACGCGCCTGTTACCC | ||
| Fp_TEF1α.2P | ACTCGACACGCGCCTGTTACCC |