Literature DB >> 35687664

Voltage-gated proton channels explain coccolithophore sensitivity to ocean acidification.

Peter von Dassow1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35687664      PMCID: PMC9231618          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206426119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


× No keyword cloud information.
Coccolithophores are unicellular photosynthetic plankton that perform extraordinary feats in ionic homeostasis to fabricate intricate nano-patterned plates made of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) crystals called coccoliths (1). Outside marine science communities, coccolithophores are less known than animal calcifiers such as shellfish or the cnidarians that form coral reefs. However, coccolithophores are one of Earth’s greatest biological producers of CaCO3. The production and sinking of coccoliths play complex roles in ocean carbon cycles, helping carry organic carbon to the deep sea as well serving on a geological scale to help the ocean buffer CO2 fluctuations (2, 3). Unlike other calcifying organisms, where precipitation of CaCO3 is extracellular, coccolithophores calcify in special intracellular Golgi-derived coccolith vesicles. To do this, they maintain among the greatest fluxes of Ca2+ and H+ known for any cell ions which would be toxic if allowed to accumulate in the cytoplasm (1). In PNAS, Kottmeier et al. (4) demonstrate how they rely on voltage-gated proton channels to expel H+ released by CaCO3 precipitation, which also offers a way forward to resolving disparate results from two decades of research on coccolithophore sensitivity to ocean acidification. Approximately a third of human CO2 emissions are absorbed by the ocean, resulting in ocean acidification. As CO2 dissolves in the sea it reacts with water to form carbonic acid, generating H+ (decreasing pH) and perturbing a set of interlocked equilibria involving CO2, HCO3−, CO32−, H+, and Ca2+ by increasing [HCO3−], decreasing [CO32−], and lowering the saturation states of alternative forms of CaCO3 (5). The inorganic chemistry is complex but comparatively well known. The response of calcifying organisms should be simple to predict if it depended only on the tendency of CaCO3 to precipitate or dissolve in seawater: Organisms such as coccolithophores which produce calcite, the more stable form of CaCO3, should be less sensitive to ocean acidification compared to organisms like many corals which produce less-stable forms such as aragonite. Instead, the sophisticated and mysterious cell physiology of coccolithophores—with complex and energetically costly fluxes of Ca2+, H+, HCO3−, and CO2, as well as the possibility that excess CO2 and H+ can be consumed by photosynthesis in the chloroplasts—has made their sensitivity to ocean acidification far from obvious. Two decades of research (6), involving experiments in the laboratory and field, as well as looking at the coccolith fossil record through past changes in ocean pH and CO2 and observing how modern coccoliths respond to environmental gradients in carbonate chemistry, often gave confusing results. Although publications tended to find that ocean acidification had a negative effect (7), many contradictory findings were reported (8, 9). In the laboratory, contrasting results have been observed not only among different species but even among different genotypes of the same species, where some strains are resistant and others highly sensitive to ocean acidification (10). The study of Kottmeier et al. (4) offers a mechanistic breakthrough, showing how one component of coccolithophore ion flux control, voltage-gated proton (Hv) channels, can determine coccolithophore sensitivity to ocean acidification. Students of biology learn about voltage-gated ion channels specific for Na+, K+, or Ca2+ for their roles in the action potentials of animal nerve and muscle cells and subsequent outputs (neurotransmitter release or contraction). The existence of voltage-gated channels specific to H+ first came to light in another unicellular planktonic organism, dinoflagellates, where a H+ action potential mediates a bioluminescent flash (11, 12), and were later found in animals (13). Electrophysiology guided by genomics and transcriptomics indicated that coccolithophores contain Hv homologs (14). This earlier study, in the same laboratory as the present Kottmeier et al. study, suggested that coccolithophore Hv channels might help pH regulation during calcification, but it still was not clear how that worked or affected sensitivity to ocean acidification. Most coccolithophore studies focus on the cosmopolitan and abundant species Emiliania huxleyi, whose vast blooms turn the sea white in the North Atlantic and large bands just north of the Southern Ocean (3). Kottmeier et al. (4) instead studied the heavily calcified species Coccolithus braarudii, which fixes more C in the form of CaCO3 than as particulate organic carbon (e.g., cell components), so it contributes disproportionately to CaCO3 fluxes compared to more lightly calcified species and exhibits the highest demands for calcification-related ion fluxes. Kottmeier et al. (4) show that exposure of C. braarudii to ocean acidification conditions predicted for the next century caused specific defects in coccolith fabrication due to loss of Hv activity. H+ efflux, rather than the K+ efflux as in other eukaryotes, appears to determine the voltage (potential) across the plasma membrane in C. braarudii (1, 14), and the activation voltage of the Hv channels are near this membrane potential. This means that intracellular pH is strongly affected by fluctuations in extracellular pH (4). This normally is an effective system for pH homeostasis in open oceans, where seawater pH is very stable, averaging near 8.2 in preindustrial times (5). The difference between pHcyt and seawater pH results in a proton motive force (pmf) pushing H+ out of the cell, and Hv channels permit very rapid disposal of H+ generated during calcification to a vast extracellular seawater sink (Fig. 1, ).
Fig. 1.

The effects of ocean acidification on coccolithophore calcification is more complex than seawater chemistry predicts, since they precipitate CaCO3 inside the cell. Higher CO2 absorbed by the sea increases H+ and pushes equilibria of inorganic carbon species toward HCO3−. As large regions of the surface ocean become undersaturated with respect to aragonite, a less-stable form of CaCO3, most will remain supersaturated with respect to calcite, the most stable form precipitated by coccolithophores. The Kottmeier et al. (4) study explains why they are still sensitive to ocean acidification. Hv channels are closed as the coccolith vesicle precursor accumulates Ca2+, HCO3−, and organic baseplate for crystal growth. Calcite precipitation in the mature vesicle creates excess H+. Photosynthesis uses dissolved CO2 directly or converts HCO3− to CO2 in the chloroplast, consuming H+, but, under normal conditions, Hv channels open, allowing H+ efflux to follow the pmf. Heavy coccoliths are formed that sink deep into the ocean. Under ocean acidification, the pmf is reversed. Even if an outward pmf were restored with further drop in pHcyt, Hv channels remain inactive. Higher CO2 under ocean acidification may decrease use of HCO3− by the chloroplast, exacerbating H+ loads due to calcification. Only energy-consuming H+ transport such as Na+/H+ exchangers (NHE) or V-ATPases (not shown) can maintain cytosol pH. Slow H+ efflux negatively affects crystal growth, causing lighter, malformed coccoliths which sink less, decreasing CaCO3 export to the deep sea. The pH values are illustrative, consistent with the model of Kottmeier et al. (4), and within measured ranges. AEL, anion exchanger-like transporter of HCO3−; Hv, voltage-gated H+ channel.

Ocean acidification lowers the difference between pHcyt and seawater pH, altering the pmf so Hv channels can no longer provide pH control. Under these conditions, C. braarudii actually maintained tighter control of cytoplasmic pH in response to extracellular pH fluctuations, because Hv channels remained closed while active H+ transport continued, probably involving Na+/H+ exchangers pushing H+ out of the cell (Fig. 1) and V-ATPases sequestering H+ in intracellular compartments, both energy-consuming mechanisms (4). Pharmacological Hv blockers replicated the ocean acidification-specific coccolith defect. These results suggest that continued CaCO3 precipitation in the coccolith vesicle depends on dynamic control of H+ flux offered by Hv channels, a model which explains how increased [H+] of ocean acidification directly causes negative impacts on calcification in these coccolithophores even when seawater remains supersaturated with respect to calcite. The authors hypothesize that the dependence of a coccolithophore on Hv channels for pH homeostasis varies with how heavy the coccoliths produced are (the rate of calcification determining how rapidly H+ must be effluxed). Some contradictions remain to be addressed. For example, wide variation exists in the degree and rate of calcification within the single species E. huxleyi, and the strains reported to be most sensitive to ocean acidification were also the least-calcifying strains that produced the most delicate coccoliths (10). Lower dependence on H+ efflux through Hv channels could involve mechanisms such as higher photosynthetic consumption of H+ or relying more on active H+ pumping out of the cytosol. The authors’ discussion of alternative mechanisms that coccolithophores might use to control H+ fluxes, which may become adaptive as ocean pH drops, might also offer a path to explaining the variety of responses to ocean acidification seen in different species and strains. A wide range of selective functions for coccoliths have been proposed, including protection against grazing, a CO2-concentrating mechanism, and modulation of light, but current evidence is inconclusive (15), meaning some ecological consequences remain unresolved. While the present study did not address this issue, it will help in refining estimates of the metabolic costs of calcification that must be offset by whatever benefits are provided. Also, lighter coccoliths should decrease CaCO3 flux to the seafloor and also might decrease organic C flux and midwater O2 levels if more organic material, without the ballast of heavy coccoliths, is respired at shallower depths before reaching the seafloor (16). Community genomic and transcriptomic sequencing efforts of the 2000s led by the Joint Genome Initiative in the United States (17) and Genoscope in France (18) allowed identifying the Hv homologs. However, the present study faced a technical limitation that genetic transformation is still not possible in C. braarudii, and success in related species (19) has not yet led to widely successful protocols. Conclusions relied on experiments with pharmacological inhibitors of Hv channels such as Zn2+ and 2-guanidinobenzimidazole (2-GBI). Although the authors did not detect other effects on cell physiology from either inhibitor, there are always limits to the specificity of pharmacological agents. Also, evaluating whether the two distinct coccolithophores’ Hvs have different roles must await reliable methods for genetic manipulation in these organisms (e.g., CRISPR or RNA interference). This highlights how the recent push for genetic tool development for marine protists (20) could provide essential insight to challenging questions in global biogeochemistry under climate change. The effects of ocean acidification on coccolithophore calcification is more complex than seawater chemistry predicts, since they precipitate CaCO3 inside the cell. Higher CO2 absorbed by the sea increases H+ and pushes equilibria of inorganic carbon species toward HCO3−. As large regions of the surface ocean become undersaturated with respect to aragonite, a less-stable form of CaCO3, most will remain supersaturated with respect to calcite, the most stable form precipitated by coccolithophores. The Kottmeier et al. (4) study explains why they are still sensitive to ocean acidification. Hv channels are closed as the coccolith vesicle precursor accumulates Ca2+, HCO3−, and organic baseplate for crystal growth. Calcite precipitation in the mature vesicle creates excess H+. Photosynthesis uses dissolved CO2 directly or converts HCO3− to CO2 in the chloroplast, consuming H+, but, under normal conditions, Hv channels open, allowing H+ efflux to follow the pmf. Heavy coccoliths are formed that sink deep into the ocean. Under ocean acidification, the pmf is reversed. Even if an outward pmf were restored with further drop in pHcyt, Hv channels remain inactive. Higher CO2 under ocean acidification may decrease use of HCO3− by the chloroplast, exacerbating H+ loads due to calcification. Only energy-consuming H+ transport such as Na+/H+ exchangers (NHE) or V-ATPases (not shown) can maintain cytosol pH. Slow H+ efflux negatively affects crystal growth, causing lighter, malformed coccoliths which sink less, decreasing CaCO3 export to the deep sea. The pH values are illustrative, consistent with the model of Kottmeier et al. (4), and within measured ranges. AEL, anion exchanger-like transporter of HCO3−; Hv, voltage-gated H+ channel.
  15 in total

1.  Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  U Riebesell; I Zondervan; B Rost; P D Tortell; R E Zeebe; F M Morel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Voltage-gated proton channel in a dinoflagellate.

Authors:  Susan M E Smith; Deri Morgan; Boris Musset; Vladimir V Cherny; Allen R Place; J Woodland Hastings; Thomas E Decoursey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coccolithophore Cell Biology: Chalking Up Progress.

Authors:  Alison R Taylor; Colin Brownlee; Glen Wheeler
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2016-10-28

4.  The Ecology, Biogeochemistry, and Optical Properties of Coccolithophores.

Authors:  William M Balch
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2018-01-03

5.  Reduced H+ channel activity disrupts pH homeostasis and calcification in coccolithophores at low ocean pH.

Authors:  Dorothee M Kottmeier; Abdesslam Chrachri; Gerald Langer; Katherine E Helliwell; Glen L Wheeler; Colin Brownlee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world.

Authors:  M Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez; Paul R Halloran; Rosalind E M Rickaby; Ian R Hall; Elena Colmenero-Hidalgo; John R Gittins; Darryl R H Green; Toby Tyrrell; Samantha J Gibbs; Peter von Dassow; Eric Rehm; E Virginia Armbrust; Karin P Boessenkool
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genetic tool development in marine protists: emerging model organisms for experimental cell biology.

Authors:  Drahomíra Faktorová; R Ellen R Nisbet; José A Fernández Robledo; Elena Casacuberta; Lisa Sudek; Andrew E Allen; Manuel Ares; Cristina Aresté; Cecilia Balestreri; Adrian C Barbrook; Patrick Beardslee; Sara Bender; David S Booth; François-Yves Bouget; Chris Bowler; Susana A Breglia; Colin Brownlee; Gertraud Burger; Heriberto Cerutti; Rachele Cesaroni; Miguel A Chiurillo; Thomas Clemente; Duncan B Coles; Jackie L Collier; Elizabeth C Cooney; Kathryn Coyne; Roberto Docampo; Christopher L Dupont; Virginia Edgcomb; Elin Einarsson; Pía A Elustondo; Fernan Federici; Veronica Freire-Beneitez; Nastasia J Freyria; Kodai Fukuda; Paulo A García; Peter R Girguis; Fatma Gomaa; Sebastian G Gornik; Jian Guo; Vladimír Hampl; Yutaka Hanawa; Esteban R Haro-Contreras; Elisabeth Hehenberger; Andrea Highfield; Yoshihisa Hirakawa; Amanda Hopes; Christopher J Howe; Ian Hu; Jorge Ibañez; Nicholas A T Irwin; Yuu Ishii; Natalia Ewa Janowicz; Adam C Jones; Ambar Kachale; Konomi Fujimura-Kamada; Binnypreet Kaur; Jonathan Z Kaye; Eleanna Kazana; Patrick J Keeling; Nicole King; Lawrence A Klobutcher; Noelia Lander; Imen Lassadi; Zhuhong Li; Senjie Lin; Jean-Claude Lozano; Fulei Luan; Shinichiro Maruyama; Tamara Matute; Cristina Miceli; Jun Minagawa; Mark Moosburner; Sebastián R Najle; Deepak Nanjappa; Isabel C Nimmo; Luke Noble; Anna M G Novák Vanclová; Mariusz Nowacki; Isaac Nuñez; Arnab Pain; Angela Piersanti; Sandra Pucciarelli; Jan Pyrih; Joshua S Rest; Mariana Rius; Deborah Robertson; Albane Ruaud; Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo; Monika A Sigg; Pamela A Silver; Claudio H Slamovits; G Jason Smith; Brittany N Sprecher; Rowena Stern; Estienne C Swart; Anastasios D Tsaousis; Lev Tsypin; Aaron Turkewitz; Jernej Turnšek; Matus Valach; Valérie Vergé; Peter von Dassow; Tobias von der Haar; Ross F Waller; Lu Wang; Xiaoxue Wen; Glen Wheeler; April Woods; Huan Zhang; Thomas Mock; Alexandra Z Worden; Julius Lukeš
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Transcriptome analysis of functional differentiation between haploid and diploid cells of Emiliania huxleyi, a globally significant photosynthetic calcifying cell.

Authors:  Peter von Dassow; Hiroyuki Ogata; Ian Probert; Patrick Wincker; Corinne Da Silva; Stéphane Audic; Jean-Michel Claverie; Colomban de Vargas
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Stable Nuclear Transformation System for the Coccolithophorid Alga Pleurochrysis carterae.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Endo; Megumi Yoshida; Toshiki Uji; Naotsune Saga; Koji Inoue; Hiromichi Nagasawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Why marine phytoplankton calcify.

Authors:  Fanny M Monteiro; Lennart T Bach; Colin Brownlee; Paul Bown; Rosalind E M Rickaby; Alex J Poulton; Toby Tyrrell; Luc Beaufort; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Samantha Gibbs; Magdalena A Gutowska; Renee Lee; Ulf Riebesell; Jeremy Young; Andy Ridgwell
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.