| Literature DB >> 26947136 |
Hirotoshi Endo1,2,3, Megumi Yoshida3, Toshiki Uji4, Naotsune Saga5, Koji Inoue3, Hiromichi Nagasawa6.
Abstract
Of the three dominant marine microalgal groups, dinoflagellates and diatoms can undergo genetic transformation; however, no transformation method has been established for haptophytes to date. Here, we report the first stable genetic transformation of a coccolithophore, Pleurochrysis carterae, by means of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transfer of a bacterial hygromycin B-resistance gene. Together with the novel transient green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression system, this approach should facilitate further molecular-based research in this phylum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26947136 PMCID: PMC4779993 DOI: 10.1038/srep22252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Microscopic views of the coccolithophore, Pleurochrysis carterae.
(a) Left: scanning electron microscopy of a calcified cell. Scale bar, 3 μm. Center: light microscopy of calcified cells; a thick coccosphere can be observed on the cell surface. Right: light microscopy of protoplasts; the coccosphere containing coccoliths is completely removed. Scale bars, 10 μm. (b) Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextran-transferred protoplasts. Left: bright-field view. Right: fluorescent view. Green fluorescence can be observed in the cytosol with red fluorescence derived from the chloroplasts. Scale bars, 50 μm. (c) Representative transient GUS-expressing cells 3 days after pFGS introduction. Since P. carterae cells were sensitive to a detergent (TritonX-100), disrupted cells were frequently observed during the experiment (data not shown). Scale bars, 50 μm. (d) Representative transient GFP-expressing cells 24 h after pFGF introduction. Scale bars, 50 μm. (e) GFP transient expression analysis. Dose-response relationship between the vector pFGF and GFP-expressing cells. The positive cells were counted at 24 h after vector administration. n = 8, bars represents mean +S.E.
Figure 2Schematic representations of the expression constructs used in the present study.
(a) pFGS, (b) pEGS, (c) pFGF, (d) pFA7. PcFCPpro, Pleurochrysis carterae FCP promoter; PyGUS, Pyropia yezoensis GUS gene; NOSter, nopaline synthase terminator derived from pBI221 vector; PcEF-1αpro, P. carterae EF-1α promoter; sGFP, a synthetic GFP gene; PyAph7, a hygromycin B-resistant gene optimized for P. yezoensis; CrRbcSter, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit terminator. *Twenty base pairs derived from the pGEM-T Easy vector were inserted. Arrows in (d) indicate a primer set used in the genomic PCR analysis. The double-headed arrow in (d) indicates the probe used in Southern hybridization analysis.
Figure 3Analysis of transient PyGUS gene expression.
(a) Comparison of PyGUS expression with the FCP promoter and EF-1α promoter. (b) Comparison of PyGUS expression depending on vector topology: the super-coiled (circular) form and linearized form (linear). (c) Relationship between the amount of vector used and PyGUS expression.
Figure 4Antibiotic selection and gene expression of mutant strains.
(a) Intact cells (left) and pFA7-introduced cells (right) after 3 weeks of selection on hygromycin B (2.5 mg/mL)-containing SLEP (representative image of n = 4). Arrows indicate the cells undergoing mitosis. Scale bars, 50 μm. (b) pFA7-introduced cells (upper panels) and intact cells (lower panels) on the hygromycin B-containing selective plates after 4 weeks of selection. Brown colonies were observed only in the transformed groups (representative image of n = 4). (c) Genomic PCR for ORF of endogenous FCP (upper), and for a region including the 3′-end of the FCP promoter and the 5′-end of the PyAph7 ORF derived from pFA7 (lower) in the ten transformed mutant strains (1–10) and wild-type strain (WT); M, molecular marker. (d) Expression of FCP (upper) and PyAph7 (lower) in the ten transformed mutant strains (1–10) and wild-type (WT) strain; M, molecular marker. (e) Southern hybridization for seven mutant strains and a WT strain; molecular marker bands are on the left.
Figure 5Survival rate analysis.
The left and right panels represent colony numbers at 2 days (a) and 3 days (b) of preincubation before hygromycin B selection, respectively.
Media and solutions.
| Eppley’s medium | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1000x metal stock | FeCl3 · 6H2O | 1000 mg |
| CuSO4 · 5H2O | 4 mg | |
| Na2MoO4 · 4H2O | 130 mg | |
| ZnSO4 · 7H2O | 250 mg | |
| CoCl2 · 6H2O | 4 mg | |
| MnSO4 · H2O | 620 mg | |
| Na2EDTA | 6 g | |
| fill up to | 1000 mL | |
| 1000x NKP stock | KNO3 | 5.05 g |
| K2HPO4 | 0.87 g | |
| fill up to | 100 mL | |
| 1000x vitamine | thiamine | 200 mg |
| biotin | 1 mg | |
| cyanocobalamin | 10 mg | |
| fill up to | 1000 mL | |
| hypo-osmotic buffer | HEPES | 10 mM |
| KCl | 100 mM | |
| NaOH | 350 μM | |
| MaMg buffer | mannitol | 400 mM |
| (pH was adjusted to 5.8 with KOH) | MgCl2 | 15 mM |
| MES | 0.1% (w/v) | |
| 40% PEG in CMS solution | PEG | 4 g |
| CMS solution | 6 mL | |
| CMS solution | mannnitol | 400 mM |
| (pH was adjusted to 7.0 with KOH) | Ca(NO3)2 | 100 mM |
Sequences of the primers and PCR programs.
| Gene | Reaction | Primer(sense, 5′→3′) | Primer(antisense 5′→3′) | PCR condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 1st inverse PCR | FCPinvF4 | FCPinvR1 | 94 °C 30 s, 50 °C 30 s, 72 °C 4 min |
| CAT GTT GAT GAA GCC GAC GAG | TGC GCC GAA CTG TTC CGA T | 25 cycles | ||
| Nested inverse PCR | FCPinvF5 | FCPinvR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 50 °C 30 s, 72 °C 4 min | |
| CGT TTT CGC CGG CAA TCG A | CCG AGA TCA CGT GGC ACA AGA T | 25 cycles | ||
| Subcloning of the promoter region | FCPproLF1NcoI | FCPproLR2XbaI | 98 °C 10 s, 57 °C 30 s, 68 °C 90 s | |
| CCA TGG CTG CAT GCA GTA TCA ACA GGC A | TCT AGA CTC GCG CAT GGC TTC ACG AGT GTG TGT G | 30 cycles | ||
| FCPproLF1HindIII | FCPproLR2XbaI | 98 °C 10 s, 55 °C 30 s, 68 °C 90 s | ||
| AAG CTT CTG CAT GCA GTA TCA ACA GGC A | see above | 25 cycles | ||
| Expression analysis | FCPExAF2 | FCPExAR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 58 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s | |
| ATG GCT CTC TCC CTG TCC G | CGA CCG TTG TTC AGC TCG AT | 30 cycles | ||
| | 1st inverse PCR | EF1alNVF1 | EF1alNVR1 | 94 °C 10 s, 59 °C 30 s, 68 °C 2.5 min |
| CCT CGA CAA GCA GAA CAT GCC | ATG GCG GTG GTG AAG TTA CC | 25 cycles | ||
| Nested inverse PCR | EF1alNVF2 | EF1alNVR2 | 94 °C 10 s, 59 °C 30 s, 68 °C 2.5 min | |
| TCG ACA TTC CGG GCG AGA TC | GCG CCG GAG ATC ATG TTC TTG | 25 cycles | ||
| Subcloning of the promoter region | EF1aproF1NcoI | EF1aproR1BamHI | 98°C 10 s, 57°C 30 s, 68°C 1 min | |
| CCA TGG CTG GGG CTG TTG CTG AGA TAC | GGA TCC CTT CTC CAT CTC ACG CTC CGG | 27 cycles | ||
| 94°C 30 s, 52°C 30 s, 72°C for 40 s | ||||
| 40 cycles | ||||
| Expression analysis | EF1aExAF1 | EF1aExAR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 52 °C 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s | |
| CGA CAA CCT CAA CAA GAA GTC GAC | ATT GGC GAG TAG CCG AGC TT | 40 cycles | ||
| Genomic PCR | EF1aExAF1 | EF1aExAR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 60 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s | |
| see above | see above | 25 cycles | ||
| | Subcloning of the ORF region | PcGFP1F1XbaI | PcGFP1R1SacI | 98 °C 10 s, 57 °C 30 s, 68 °C 1 min |
| TCT AGA ATG GTG AGC AAG GGC GAG | GAG CTC TTA CTT GTA CAG CTC GTC CAT G | 27 cycles | ||
| | Expression analysis | PyGUSExAF2 | PyGUSExAR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 52 °C 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s |
| GCA GTT CCT GAT CAA CCA CA | AGA ACA TCA CGT TCA CGC AC | 40 cycles | ||
| | Expression analysis | AphExAF1 | AphExAR2 | 94 °C 30 s, 58 °C 30 s, 72 °C 45 s |
| GAC GCA GGA GTC CCT GCT | ACG AAG ATG TTG GTC CCG T | 30 cycles | ||
| | Genomic PCR | checkFCPproF1232 | AphExAR1 | 94 °C 30 s, 60 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s |
| ACA CTG CAC CGT CCA GGT T | TCC GGG AAG ACC TCG GAG T | 30 cycles |