Literature DB >> 25547022

Patient-specific bone modeling and analysis: the role of integration and automation in clinical adoption.

Amir A Zadpoor1, Harrie Weinans2.   

Abstract

Patient-specific analysis of bones is considered an important tool for diagnosis and treatment of skeletal diseases and for clinical research aimed at understanding the etiology of skeletal diseases and the effects of different types of treatment on their progress. In this article, we discuss how integration of several important components enables accurate and cost-effective patient-specific bone analysis, focusing primarily on patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling of bones. First, the different components are briefly reviewed. Then, two important aspects of patient-specific FE modeling, namely integration of modeling components and automation of modeling approaches, are discussed. We conclude with a section on validation of patient-specific modeling results, possible applications of patient-specific modeling procedures, current limitations of the modeling approaches, and possible areas for future research.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Finite element modeling; Functional data; Image processing; Musculoskeletal modeling; Subject-specific modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25547022     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.

Authors:  Anupama Goparaju; Krithika Iyer; Alexandre Bône; Nan Hu; Heath B Henninger; Andrew E Anderson; Stanley Durrleman; Matthijs Jacxsens; Alan Morris; Ibolya Csecs; Nassir Marrouche; Shireen Y Elhabian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Precision medicine using patient-specific modelling: state of the art and perspectives in dental practice.

Authors:  Pierre Lahoud; Reinhilde Jacobs; Philippe Boisse; Mostafa EzEldeen; Maxime Ducret; Raphael Richert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Cloud-Based Automated Design and Additive Manufacturing: A Usage Data-Enabled Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Dirk Lehmhus; Thorsten Wuest; Stefan Wellsandt; Stefan Bosse; Toshiya Kaihara; Klaus-Dieter Thoben; Matthias Busse
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Additively Manufactured Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and the Prediction of their Mechanical Behavior: A Review.

Authors:  Xiang-Yu Zhang; Gang Fang; Jie Zhou
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Raphaël Richert; Jean-Christophe Farges; Faleh Tamimi; Naim Naouar; Philippe Boisse; Maxime Ducret
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Automated Pipeline to Generate Anatomically Accurate Patient-Specific Biomechanical Models of Healthy and Pathological FSUs.

Authors:  Sebastiano Caprara; Fabio Carrillo; Jess G Snedeker; Mazda Farshad; Marco Senteler
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT.

Authors:  Tanja Lerchl; Malek El Husseini; Amirhossein Bayat; Anjany Sekuboyina; Luis Hermann; Kati Nispel; Thomas Baum; Maximilian T Löffler; Veit Senner; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 8.  Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Jacob M Reeves; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.