| Literature DB >> 35683824 |
Manuela Ceraulo1,2, Francesco Paolo La Mantia1,2, Maria Chiara Mistretta1, Vincenzo Titone1,3.
Abstract
Biodegradable Mater-Bi (MB) composites reinforced with hazelnut shell (HS) powder were prepared in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder followed by compression molding and injection molding. The effects of reinforcement on the morphology, static and dynamic mechanical properties, and thermal and rheological properties of MB/HS biocomposites were studied. Rheological tests showed that the incorporation of HS significantly increased the viscosity of composites with non-Newtonian behavior at low frequencies. On the other hand, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination revealed poor interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the filler. The thermal property results indicated that HS could act as a nucleating agent to promote the crystallization properties of biocomposites. Furthermore, the experimental results indicated that the addition of HS led to a significant improvement in the thermomechanical stability of the composites. This paper demonstrates that the incorporation of a low-cost waste product, such as hazelnut shells, is a practical way to produce low-cost biocomposites with good properties. With a content of HS of 10%, a remarkable improvement in the elastic modulus and impact strength was observed in both compression and injection-molded samples. With a higher content of HS, however, the processability in injection molding was strongly worsened.Entities:
Keywords: biocomposites; biodegradable polymers; dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA); hazelnut shells; mechanical properties; rheology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683824 PMCID: PMC9182734 DOI: 10.3390/polym14112151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Relevant properties of the polymer investigated.
| Polymer | Density, g/cm3 | MFR, g/10 min (2.16 kg at 230 °C) | Melting Point, °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mater-Bi® El51N0 | 1.23 | 19 | 167 |
Figure 1(a) HS powder; (b) scanning electronic microscope (SEM) image of HS (scale marked as 200 μm).
Figure 2Schematic for biocomposite fabrication by compression molding and injection molding.
Figure 3Injection molding samples: (a) MB; (b) MB/HS 10%.
Figure 4DSC thermograms recorded during the first heating for MB and biocomposites.
DSC first heating results for MB and biocomposites.
| Sample Name | Tm, °C | ΔHm(J/g) |
|---|---|---|
| MB | 168.5 | 27.1 |
| MB/HS 10% | 175.2 | 31.5 |
| MB/HS 30% | 173.1 | 39.8 |
Tm, melting temperature; ΔHm, melting enthalpy.
Figure 5Complex viscosity as a function of frequency of MB and biocomposites.
Figure 6Storage modulus as a function of frequency of MB and biocomposites.
Figure 7DMA storage modulus (E′) curves of MB and biocomposites.
Figure 8Tan δ curves of MB and biocomposites.
Figure 9Histogram of tensile strength and elongation at break of MB and biocomposite.
Figure 10Stress–strain curve of MB and biocomposites.
Figure 11SEM micrographs of the two biocomposites, (a) MB/HS 10% and (b) MB/HS 30%; (c) MB.
Figure 12Compression- and injection-molded samples’ stress–strain curves.
Elastic modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at break of compression-molded and injection-molded MB and MB/HZ 10% samples.
| Sample Name | Elastic Modulus, | Tensile Strength, | Elongation at Break, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| MB (CM) |
|
|
|
| MB/HS 10% (CM) |
|
|
|
| MB (IM) |
|
|
|
| MB/HS 10% (IM) |
|
|
|
Impact strength.
| Property | MB | MB/HS 10% |
|---|---|---|
| Impact strength, KJ/m2 |
|
|