| Literature DB >> 34067633 |
Vincenzo Titone1,2, Antonio Correnti3, Francesco Paolo La Mantia1,2.
Abstract
This work is focused on the influence of moisture content on the processing and mechanical properties of a biodegradable polyester used for applications in injection molding. The pellets of the biodegradable polyester were exposed under different relative humidity conditions at a constant temperature before being compression molded. The compression-molded specimens were again placed under the above conditions before the mechanical testing. With all these samples, it is possible to determine the effect of moisture content on the processing and mechanical properties separately, as well as the combined effect of moisture content on the mechanical properties. The results obtained showed that the amount of absorbed water-both before processing and before mechanical testing-causes an increase in elongation at break and a slight reduction of the elastic modulus and tensile strength. These changes have been associated with possible hydrolytic degradation during the compression molding process and, in particular, with the plasticizing action of the moisture absorbed by the specimens.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradable polymers; mechanical properties; moisture content; processing; rheology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067633 PMCID: PMC8156231 DOI: 10.3390/polym13101616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Environmental conditions used for conditioning the pellets and the compression-molded specimens.
| Condition 1 | Condition 2 | Condition 3 |
|---|---|---|
| T = 38 °C | T = 38 °C | T = 38 °C |
| RH = 0% | RH = 50% | RH = 90% |
Figure 1Scheme of the procedure adopted in this work.
Specimens for rheological and mechanical characterization.
| Specimens Code | ||
|---|---|---|
| MC11 | MC21 | MC31 |
| MC12 | MC22 | MC32 |
| MC13 | MC23 | MC33 |
Moisture content of the polymer conditioned under different relative humidity.
| Relative Humidity, % | Moisture Content, % |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.00 |
| 50 | 0.35 |
| 90 | 0.42 |
Figure 2Stress–strain curve of samples coming from pellets conditioned under the three conditions and specimens for mechanical testing conditioned at RH = 0%.
Figure 3Stress–strain curve of samples coming from pellets conditioned under the three conditions and specimens for mechanical testing conditioned at RH = 50%.
Figure 4Stress–strain curve of samples coming from pellets conditioned under the three conditions and specimens for mechanical testing conditioned at RH = 90%.
Elastic modulus, E, tensile strength, TS, elongation at break, EB, of all the specimens.
| Specimens Code | E, MPa | TS, MPa | EB, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| MC11 | 336 ± 18 | 13.0 ± 0.8 | 65 ± 6 |
| MC21 | 334 ± 13 | 13.0 ± 0.7 | 82 ± 4 |
| MC31 | 333 ± 13 | 12.0 ± 0.6 | 103 ± 10 |
| MC12 | 329 ± 22 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 147 ± 24 |
| MC22 | 328 ± 17 | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 143 ± 15 |
| MC32 | 323 ± 11 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 182 ± 12 |
| MC13 | 318 ± 10 | 10.5 ± 0.9 | 301± 29 |
| MC23 | 314 ± 13 | 10.1 ± 1.1 | 395 ± 34 |
| MC33 | 313 ± 18 | 9.0 ± 0.3 | 381 ± 16 |
Figure 5Flow curves of the samples from pellets conditioned under the three humidity conditions and specimen conditioned at RH = 0 and 90% after processing.
Figure 6Histogram of the EB dimensionless values of all samples.