| Literature DB >> 35683360 |
Ewa Kupcewicz1, Kamila Rachubińska2, Aleksandra Gaworska-Krzemińska3, Anna Andruszkiewicz4, Ewa Kawalec-Kajstura5, Dorota Kozieł6, Małgorzata A Basińska7, Elżbieta Grochans2.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the mediatory role of emotional control with respect to the control of anger, depression, and anxiety in the relationship between positive orientation and tiredness/fatigue occurring in a group of Polish nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study included 894 nursing students from six universities in Poland. A diagnostic survey was applied as the research method, and the data were collected using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS) and the Positive Orientation Scale (SOP). The mean participant age was 20.73 years (SD = 1.81). More than half of the students in the study showed a low level of positive orientation. Correlational analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between positive orientation and tiredness/fatigue experienced by the students participating in the study (r = -0.336; p < 0.001), and correlation between positive orientation and the overall emotional control index (r = -0.317; p < 0.001), and the indices of control of anger (r = -0.154; p < 0.01), depression (r = -0.376; p < 0.001), and anxiety (r = -0.236; p < 0.01). Analysis of the results also revealed the occurrence of significant, positive links between the controlled emotions and their components and the tiredness/fatigue experienced by nursing students. It is important to take action associated with the prevention of tiredness/fatigue among students and to reinforce a positive orientation and the capacity to control emotions to effectively minimize the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing students.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; psychological problems
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683360 PMCID: PMC9181178 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11112971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Descriptive statistics of the variables under analysis.
| Variables | N = 894 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 95% CI | Me | Min.–Max. | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | ||
| SOP | 26.87 | 26.48–27.26 | 27 | 9–40 | 5.90 | −0.34 | 0.02 | |
| FSS | 37.93 | 37.20–38.65 | 38 | 9–63 | 11.38 | −0.04 | −0.22 | |
| Subscales-CECS | Anger control | 16.66 | 16.13–16.82 | 16 | 7–28 | 4.79 | 0.18 | −0.74 |
| Depression control | 17.87 | 17.91–19.58 | 19 | 7–29 | 4.62 | −0.17 | −0.54 | |
| Anxiety control | 16.92 | 16.71–17.36 | 17 | 7–30 | 4.85 | 0.03 | −0.32 | |
| CECS-general emotional control | 51.45 | 50.95–52.55 | 52 | 21–84 | 11.74 | 0.05 | −0.16 | |
Explanation: N—sample size, M—arithmetic mean, 95% CI—confidence interval of the mean, Me—median, Min.—minimum, Max.—maximum, SD—standard deviation, SOP—positive orientation, FSS—fatigue severity scale, CECS—emotional control scale.
Figure 1Positive orientation score structure among the nursing students on the sten scale.
A matrix of Pearson correlation (r) coefficients between the variables under analysis.
| Variables | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | SOP | - | ||||||
| 2. | FSS | −0.336 *** | - | |||||
| 3. | Subscales-CECS | Anger control | −0.154 ** | 0.088 *** | - | |||
| 4. | Depression control | −0.376 *** | 0.303 *** | 0.508 *** | - | |||
| 5. | Anxiety control | −0.236 ** | 0.095 *** | 0.408 *** | 0.481 *** | - | ||
| 6. | CECS—General emotional control | −0.317 *** | 0.201 *** | 0.804 *** | 0.824 *** | 0.779 *** | - | |
Statistically significant: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; The analyses are presented for the number of observations N = 894. Explanation: SOP—positive orientation, FSS—fatigue severity scale, CECS—emotional control scale.
Figure 2The relation diagram for the mediation model.
Figure 3A relationship diagram in the model testing the mediatory effect of emotional control in the general dimension of the relationship between positive orientation and the degree of tiredness/fatigue. Statistically significant: *** p < 0.001. Explanation: SOP—positive orientation, FSS—fatigue severity scale, CECS—emotional control scale.
Figure 4A relationship diagram of the model testing the mediatory effect of anger control on the relationship between positive orientation and the degree of tiredness/fatigue. Statistically significant: *** p < 0.001. Explanation: SOP—positive orientation, FSS—fatigue severity scale.
Figure 5A relationship diagram of the model testing the mediatory effect of anxiety control of the relationship between positive orientation and the degree of tiredness/fatigue. Statistically significant: *** p < 0.001. Explanation: SOP—positive orientation, FSS—fatigue severity scale.