| Literature DB >> 35683083 |
Akansha Mehta1,2, Khaoula Karbouche3, Jozef Kraxner1, Hamada Elsayed2,4, Dušan Galusek1,5, Enrico Bernardo2.
Abstract
The present COVID-19 emergency has dramatically increased the demand for pharmaceutical containers, especially vials. End-of-life containers, however, cannot be easily recycled in the manufacturing of new articles. This paper presents some strategies for upcycling of pharmaceutical glass into various porous ceramics. Suspensions of a fine glass powder (70 vol%) are used as a starting material. Highly uniform cellular structures may be easily prepared by vigorous mechanical stirring of partially gelified suspensions with added surfactant, followed by drying and firing at 550-650 °C. Stabilization of the cellular structures at temperatures as low as the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the used glass is facilitated by thermal decomposition of the gel phase, instead of viscous flow sintering of glass. This finding enabled the preparation of glass membranes (∼78 vol% open porosity), by direct firing of hardened suspensions, avoiding any surfactant addition and mechanical stirring. The powders obtained by crushing of hardened suspensions, even in unfired state, may be used as a low-cost sorbent for dye removal.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; alkali activation; glass foam; upcycling
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683083 PMCID: PMC9181467 DOI: 10.3390/ma15113784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Low and high magnification micrographs of (a,b) foamed suspension of glass particles in alkaline solution, after drying; (c,d) glass foam, after firing at 650 °C.
Physical and mechanical properties of porous materials from pharmaceutical glass.
| Surfactant (wt.%) | 4 | 2 | (No Foaming) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firing T (°C) | 650 | 550 | green | 650 | 550 | green | 650 | 550 | green | green, after boiling |
| ρgeom (g/cm3) | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.41 ± 0.04 | 1.43 ± 0.10 | 1.32 ± 0.10 |
| ρapparent (g/cm3) | 2.17 ± 0.05 | 2.35 ± 0.05 | 2.31 ± 0.05 | 2.08 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.32 ± 0.05 | 2.01 ± 0.05 | 2.19 ± 0.05 | 2.33 ± 0.05 | 2.31 ± 0.05 |
| ρtrue (g/cm3) | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.37 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.37 ± 0.05 | 2.37 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.35 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.05 | 2.38 ± 0.05 | 2.37 ± 0.05 |
| Total porosity (%) | 70.3 | 75.4 | 77.2 | 67.5 | 72.9 | 75.8 | 36.5 | 40.2 | 38.7 | 42.5 |
| Open porosity (%) | 67.7 | 74.9 | 77.0 | 63.0 | 72.8 | 75.4 | 25.9 | 35.6 | 38.3 | 42.5 |
| Closed porosity (%) | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 10.6 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 0 |
| σcomp (MPa) | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 19.4 ± 0.8 | 16.4 ± 0.8 | 21.3 ± 0.8 | 19.4 ± 0.8 |
| σbend (MPa) | ~120 | ~35 | ~20 | ~25 | ~30 | |||||
Figure 2Microstructural details of porous materials from low temperature (550 °C) firing: (a) cell wall of a foam; (b) membrane.
Figure 3Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis of boro−alumino-silicate glass in the as-received state, after activation and after firing.
Figure 4X-ray diffraction patterns of boro-alumino-silicate glass (a) in the as-received state, after activation and after firing; (b) after boiling and use as sorbent.
Figure 5Low and high magnification micrographs of samples after cold consolidation: (a,b) simply hardened suspension; (c,d) after boiling test.
Results of BET characterization of BSG powders.
| Sample | BET Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Pore Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSG, starting powders | 3.4 ± 1 | 0.014 | 2.9 |
| BSG activated, | 16.0 ± 1 | 0.028 | 2.2 |
| BSG activated, hardened, and crushed, after boiling | 2.5 ± 1 | 0.015 | 2.9 |
| BSG + TiO2 activated, | 95.5 ± 1 | 0.146 | 2.2 |
Figure 6(a) Optical spectra of the methylene blue solution; (b) evolution of relative concentration of methylene blue with increasing UV exposition time; (c) efficiency of dye removal of the BSG activated powder with the number of sorption cycles.
Figure 7(a) Detail of glass/TiO2 composite granule; (b) diffraction analysis of hardened glass/TiO2 suspension; (c) evolution of relative concentration with increasing UV exposition time operating with TiO2 photocatalyst.