| Literature DB >> 35682044 |
Parteek Singh Thind1, Deepak Kumar2, Sandeep Singh3, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan4, Raman Kumar4, Shubham Sharma4,5, Changhe Li6, Gianpaolo Di Bona7, Antonio Forcina8, Luca Silvestri9.
Abstract
The Indian Western Himalayas (IWHs) are a world famous tourist spot, and every year millions of tourists visit this area in fossil fuel-driven vehicles. Emissions from these vehicles persistently deteriorate the pristine environment of the IWHs. Therefore, in the current study, efforts were made to assess the compromised environmental conditions of Manali, Himachal Pradesh, India that resulted from the inflow of tourists and the activities undertaken by them. This study revealed that Manali could sustainably accommodate only 0.305 M tourists/month, and this threshold was reported to be crossed in the months of April, May and June. Furthermore, to augment these findings, water and ambient air samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of elemental carbon (EC) from one of the medium tourism potential regions of Manali, i.e., the Hamta glacier. The tributary receiving water from the Hamta glacier and the ambient air of the area was observed to be contaminated with 42 ± 12 ppb and 880 ± 43 µg m-3 of EC, respectively. It was observed that the inhalation and ingestion of EC-contaminated air and water could jeopardize human health due to a high lifetime cancer risk. However, without the intervention of eco-tourism in the study area, higher environmental health effects were also speculated. The observations made in this study are expected to trigger the interests of the researchers, international scientific community and regional authorities working towards the unsustainable development of the IWHs and deteriorating environmental conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Indian Western Himalayas; cancer risk assessment; elemental carbon; environmental conditions; sustainable development
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682044 PMCID: PMC9180477 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Keyword analysis of recent studies evaluated through Vosviewer.
Figure 2Geographic location of the site for collecting the water samples.
Figure 3Geographical location of Manali, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Figure 4Brief methodology adopted during the study.
Operating conditions for AE51.
| Operating Parameters | Units | Operating Conditions AE 51 |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelength number | - | Single-wavelength |
| Volumetric flow rate | m3 s−1 | 1.07 × 10−6 |
| Measurement period | S | 1, 60, 300 |
| Sample spot area | m2 | 7 × 10−6 |
| Deposition velocity | m s−1 | 0.26 |
| Attenuation parameter | m2 g−1 | 11.5 |
Parametric evaluation of Tourism Potential regions.
| Indicators | Weight | Normalized Weights for Indicators | Sub-Categories | Adjusted Rank | Normalized Weights for Sub-Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Resources | 4 | 0.25 | Forests | 6 | 0.24 |
| Cultural Resources | 2 | 0.12 | Meadow | 5 | 0.22 |
| Rivers | 3 | 0.14 | |||
| Lakes | 3 | 0.14 | |||
| Hot and cold water springs | 4 | 0.11 | |||
| Glaciers | 4 | 0.10 | |||
| Historical Monuments | 4 | 0.6 | |||
| Informational art | 1 | 0.5 | |||
| Cultural-organizations | 2 | 0.4 | |||
| Adventure Sports | 3 | 0.25 | Camping and trekking | 3 | 0.4 |
| Ice-related sports | 4 | 0.20 | |||
| Water sports | 3 | 0.10 | |||
| Hunting and fishing | 2 | 0.1 | |||
| Tourist accommodation | 3 | 0.4 | |||
| Facilities & Infrastructure | 5 | 0.38 | Transport and communication | 3 | 0.3 |
| Infrastructure | 4 | 0.20 | |||
| Shopping | 3 | 0.2 | |||
| Gardens | 1 | 0.2 |
Description of exposure parameters of ingestion and inhalation.
| Denotations | Exposure Parameter (Units) | Standard Values | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | Concentration | - | - |
| BW | Body Weight (kg) | Adult = 75; Children = 15 | [ |
| EF | Exposure Frequency (d y−) | 365 (for both adults and children) | [ |
| ED | Exposure Duration (y) | Adult = 30; Children = 6 | [ |
| LT | Life Time (y) | 65 (for both adults and children) | [ |
| AT | Average exposure Time (y) | For Non-carcinogenic: ED × 365; | [ |
| IRi | Rate of ingestion (L d−) | 2 for adults and 0.7 for children | [ |
| IRj | Rate of inhalation( | 20 for adults and 7.6 for children | [ |
Slope factor (mg kg−1 d−1)−1 of benz[a]pyrene for different exposure pathways.
| S.No. | Exposure Pathway | Slope Factor | Reference |
| 1 | Ingestion | 11.5 | Masters (2000) |
| 2 | Inhalation | 6.11 | Masters (2000) |
| 3 | Dermal | 2.5 | Masters (2000) |
Input values for different parameters used in the estimation of DA and SF.
| S.No. | Parameters | Descriptions | Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K | Coefficient of permeability of the skin (cm h−1) | 0.001 |
| 2 | t | Time of contact with skin (h d−1) | 0.4 |
| 3 | CF | Conversion factor | 0.001 |
| 4 | H | Height of an adult and children (cm) | 165 and 114, respectively |
Estimation of Tourism Carrying Capacity of Manali.
| Denotation | Parameters’ Description | Manali City |
|---|---|---|
| A | Area for recreation | 30 × 106 m2 |
| Au | Minimum area required by a tourist | 15 m2 |
| Rf | Rotation factor | 1 |
| PCC | Physical carrying capacity | 2 × 106 |
| cf1 | Temperature limiting factor | 0.5 |
| cf2 | Rainfall limiting factor | 0.65 |
| cf3 | Infrastructure limiting factor | 0.9 |
| cf4 | Transport limiting factor | 0.88 |
| cf5 | Management limiting factor | 0.65 |
| cf6 | Perception limiting factor | 0.91 |
| TML | Total magnitude of limiting factor | 1.52 |
| TCC | Tourism carrying capacity | 0.3 M |
Figure 5Comparison of monthly tourism (2017) with TCC in Manali.
Concentration of EC in different environmental media.
| Sample No. | Concentration in Water Samples (ppb) | Concentration in Air Samples (µg/m3) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.02 | 870 |
| 2 | 48.14 | 922 |
| 3 | 46.55 | 850 |
| 4 | 48.79 | 860 |
| 5 | 49.04 | 922 |
| 6 | 54.00 | 950 |
| 7 | 51.97 | 840 |
| 8 | 20.37 | 840 |
| 9 | 35.20 | 850 |
| 10 | 44 | 940 |
Life time cancer risk assessment (×10−6).
| Glaciers | Life Time Cancer Risk | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingestion | Inhalation | Dermal | |||||
| Year | Adults | Children | Adults | Children | Adults | Children | |
| Hamta | 2017 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 0 | 0.05 |