| Literature DB >> 35681984 |
Anna Surówka1, Kamila Szumilas2, Aleksandra Wilk3, Kamila Misiakiewicz-Has3, Kazimierz Ciechanowski1, Karolina Kędzierska-Kapuza1,4.
Abstract
Immunosuppressive drugs are widely and chronically used to avoid graft rejection in transplant recipients. However, they are also known to have organotoxic effects and can exert numerous side effects. The aim of this study was to assess whether the chronic treatment of rats with the most commonly used clinical immunosuppressive regimens in organ recipients had an effect on the morphology and function of the aorta. The rats were divided into five groups and each group was chronically treated with different sets of three immunosuppressive drugs (TRG, CRG, MRG, CMG, TMG) for 6 months. The changes were most profound in calcineurin inhibitor-based protocols. TMG protocol treatment was characterized by the most numerous alterations such as morphological changes, changes in the thickness of the tunic media, wider distances between elastic lamellae, an increase in the number of vSMCs and changes in collagen deposition. We concluded that the morphological changes were connected with MMP-2 and MMP-9/TIMP-2 and TIMP-1 imbalances, which was also determined and noticed.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aorta; aortal media; immunosuppressive drugs; metalloproteinase inhibitors; metalloproteinases; morphology; morphometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681984 PMCID: PMC9180580 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Drug protocols used in the current experiment.
Figure 2Tunics in wall of elastic artery.
Figure 3Aorta of rats treated with panels of immunosuppressive drugs. TRG, CRG, TMG—yellow arrows indicate changed shape of vascular smooth muscle cells in media; CRG—folded tunica intima. Red arrows indicate aortal intima. Hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) staining. Objective magn. ×40; bar 100 μm.
Figure 4Visualization of elastic (A) and collagen fibers (B–D). Red arrows indicate aortal intima. (A): yellow arrows indicate fragmentation of elastic fibers in lamellae in CRG and thickening of elastic lamellae in media in TRG groups; (B)—collagen fibers accumulation in media (deep blue); (C)—collagen type I with yellow color and strong birefringence (yellow arrows) and collagen type III with greenish color and weak birefringence (green arrows); (D)—type III collagen in aortal media (D). Orcein staining (A); Mallory trichrome staining (B); Picro-Sirius Red—Polarizing microscopy(C); Silver impregnation (D). Objective magn. ×40; bar 100 μm.
The parameters of morphometry of the aorta of rat treated with different immunosuppressive drugs protocols.
| Control | TRG | CRG | MRG | CMG | TMG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width of | ||||||
| AM ± SD | 65.4 ± 3.09 | 79.83 ± 2.95 | 49.81 ± 3.34 | 75.71 ± 5.34 | 88.06 ± 2.87 | 123.81 ± 6.05 |
| Median | 65.3 | 79.75 * | 50.3 *,T | 76.0 * | 88.15 *,T | 122.3 * |
| Min–max | 61.6–70 | 74.3–84.0 | 44.7–53.6 | 69.7–88.1 | 83.5–93.0 | 117.1–133.6 |
| Distance between elastic lamellae in | ||||||
| AM ± SD | 9.26 ± 2.38 | 10.48 ± 2.82 | 9.62 ± 3.11 | 18.54 ± 24.41 | 10.2 ± 1.98 | 19.52 ± 5.41 |
| Median | 9.75 | 10.65 | 8.65 | 14.6 * | 9.7 | 17.45 *,T |
| Min–max | 3.3–14.6 | 4.8–14.8 | 2.6–19.1 | 5.9–143.0 | 6.6–13.7 | 11.5–39.0 |
| Number of vascular smooth muscle cells nuclei in | ||||||
| AM ± SD | 53.83 ± 4.53 | 72.33 ± 3.14 | 54 ± 7.48 | 39.66 ± 6.12 | 99.50 ± 10.05 | 138.66 ± 8.14 |
| Median | 55.5 | 72.5 * | 55.0 T | 39.0 *,T,C | 98.50 *,T,C,M | 139.0 *,T,C,M |
| Min–max | 46.0–58.0 | 68.0–77.0 | 44.0–62.0 | 32.0–50.0 | 89.0–111.0 | 128.0–151.0 |
AM: arithmetic mean; SD: standard deviation; n—number of measured parameters, Min–Max—minimum and maximum values; * p < 0.05 vs. control; T p < 0.05 vs. TRG; C p < 0.05 vs. CRG; M p < 0.05 vs. MRG.
Area of collagen fibers in tunica media of aorta in the study groups of rat.
| Parameter/Group | Control ( | TRG ( | CRG ( | MRG ( | CMG ( | TMG ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area of collagen fibers in tunica media of aorta (%) | ||||||
| Mean ± SD | 43.3 ± 19.6 | 85.25 ± 4.8 | 70.0 ± 4.06 | 57.89 ± 11.81 | 66.81 ± 8.21 | 92.36 ± 6.21 |
| Median | 45.56 | 86.24 * | 70.0 * | 58.3 T | 66.46 T | 94.02 *,C,M,∆ |
| Min–Max | 10.62–74.65 | 73.3–92.21 | 61.84–5.32 | 27.07–73.97 | 55.58–85.46 | 76.06–97.97 |
AM: arithmetic mean; SD: standard deviation; n—number of measured areas; Min–Max—minimum and maximum values * p < 0.05 vs. control; T p < 0.05 vs. TRG; C p < 0.05 vs. CRG; M p < 0.05 vs. MRG; ∆ p < 0.05 vs. MRG.
Area of collagen fibers in tunica media of aorta due to main drug-based protocols.
| Parameter/Group | Control ( | Tac—Based Protocols (TRG, TMG) ( | CsA—Based Protocols (CRG, CMG) ( | MMF—Based Protocols (MRG, CMG, TMG) ( | Rapa—Based Protocols (TRG, CRG, MRG) ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area of collagen fibers in tunica media of aorta (%) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 43.31 ± 19.6 | 88.81 ± 6.56 | 68.08 ± 7.0 | 72.3 ± 17.2 | 71.18 ± 14.37 |
| Median | 45.56 | 89.35 * | 67.28 *,T | 68.18 *,T | 71.75 *,T |
| Min–Max | 10.62–74.61 | 73.3–97.97 | 55.58–85.46 | 27.07–97.97 | 26.47–92.21 |
AM: arithmetic mean; SD—standard deviation; n—number of measured areas; Min–Max—minimum and maximum values * p < 0.05 vs. control; T p < 0.05 vs. Tac—based protocol.
Figure 5Immunolocalization of MMP-2 (A) and TIMP2 (B) in aorta of rats in all groups. Red arrows indicate aortal intima. IHC A and B. Objective magn. ×40; bar 100 μm.
Figure 6Immunolocalization of MMP-9 (A) and TIMP1 (B) in wall of aorta in all groups of animal. Red arrows indicate aortal intima. IHC A and B. Objective magn. ×40; bar 100 μm.
The expression MMP-2 and MMP-9, and their inhibitors—TIMP-2 and TIMP-1 in tested groups. Relations between MMPs expression and their inhibitors in relation to maintaining equilibrium or imbalance.
| Parameter/Group | Control ( | TRG | CRG | MRG | CMG ( | TMG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||
| Area of MMP2 in tunica media of aorta (%) | Mean ± SD | 11.24 ± 4.64 | 8.3 ± 3.57 | 47.16 ± 21.04 | 3.29 ± 1.87 | 10.39 ± 6.42 | 7.94 ± 2.42 |
| Median | 9.7 C,M | 8.83 C,M | 51.78 *,T,M,∆,^ | 3.21 *,T,C,∆,^ | 9.88 C,M | 7.48 C,M | |
| Min–Max | 5.79–21.34 | 1.75–4.11 | 8.73–79.98 | 0.84–8.01 | 1.05–25,32 | 4.42–15.02 | |
| Area of TIMP2 in tunica media of aorta (%) | Mean ± SD | 2.18 ± 1.09 | 7.19 ± 4.4 | 6.71 ± 5.84 | 13.01 ± 9.08 | 1.53 ± 1.02 | 11.75 ± 9.48 |
| Median | 2.18 T,M,∆ | 6.83 *,T,C,∆,^ | 3.71 M,∆ | 11.72 *,C,^ | 1.34 *,T,C | 11.03 T,M | |
| Min–Max | 4.4–16.19 | 0.00–0.33 | 2.22–1.84 | 0.02–0.61 | 0.12–4.76 | 1.12–14.22 | |
| MMP2/TIMP2 | > | > | > | < | > | < | |
| Area of MMP9 in tunica media of aorta (%) | Mean ± SD | 3.46 ± 2.74 | 6.57 ± 5.83 | 1.17 ± 0.7 | 7.16 ± 5.67 | 1.63 ± 1.57 | 20.79 ± 17.85 |
| Median | 2.12 ^ | 3.18 C,∆,^ | 1.17 T,M,^ | 6.9 C,∆ | 1.23 T,M,^ | 18.94 *,T,C,∆ | |
| Min–Max | 0.56–11.8 | 0.81–18.4 | 0.10–2.64 | 0.81–18.92 | 0.21–5.5 | 2.07–66.2 | |
| Area of TIMP1 in tunica media of aorta (%) | Mean ± SD | 2.18 ± 1.09 | 7.19 ± 4.4 | 6.71 ± 5.84 | 13.01 ± 9.08 | 1.53 ± 1.02 | 11.75 ± 9.48 |
| Median | 2.18 T,M,^ | 6.83 *,∆ | 3.71 ∆ | 11.72 *,∆ | 1.34 T,C,M,^ | 11.03 *,∆ | |
| Min–Max | 0.53–4.54 | 0.41–3.42 | 2.16–0.98 | 2.23–0.28 | 0.16–4.39 | 0.72–31.58 | |
| MMP9/TIMP1 | = | < | < | < | = | > |
AM: arithmetic mean; SD—standard deviation; n—number of measured areas; Min–Max—minimum and maximum values. * p < 0.05 vs control; T p < 0.05 vs. TRG; C p < 0.05 vs. CRG; M p < 0.05 vs. MRG; ∆ p < 0.05 vs. CMG; ^ p < 0.05 vs. TM.