| Literature DB >> 35681883 |
Inhyuk Jeong1, Sang Weon Na1, Hyeok Joong Kang1, Seung Ju Park1, Da Jin Sol Jung1, Seok Hyeon Beak1, Jaesung Lee1, Do-Hyun Kim1, Hyun Jin Kim1, Mohammad Malekkhahi1, Kamburawala Kankanamge Tharindu Namal Ranaweera1, Myunggi Baik1,2.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of the partial substitution of corn grain in the diet with beet pulp on growth performance, ruminal fermentation characteristics, microbial profiles, and blood lipogenic parameters in fattening steers. Twelve Korean cattle steers (body weight, 485 ± 19.32 kg; age, 18.0 ± 0.17 months) were equally divided into corn grain (CG) and beet pulp (BP) groups. Approximately 75% of dry matter of the requirement was offered as a concentrate portion, and the remaining 25% was offered as oat straw. Eighty percent of the concentrate portion was provided by a pelleted basal concentrate, and the remaining 20% with corn grain for the CG group, or 18% beet pulp plus 2.0% rumen-protected fat for the BP group, respectively, by top dressing. The experiment was conducted for 14 weeks, including a 2-week acclimation period. Growth rate was not affected by beet pulp feeding (p = 0.55). The molar proportions of ruminal acetate (p < 0.05) on wk 4, the relative abundances of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria, including Fibrobacter succinogenes (p = 0.01) and Ruminococcus albus (p = 0.04) on wk 12, and serum insulin concentrations (p < 0.05) on wk 12 were higher in the BP group than in the CG group, whereas the molar proportions of propionate (p < 0.05) on wks 8 and 12 and serum nonesterified fatty acids (p < 0.05) on wk 12 were lower in the BP group. Beet pulp could be used as a lipogenic energy source without affecting growth performance during the fattening period of cattle.Entities:
Keywords: acetate; beef cattle; byproduct; lipogenic potential; microbial population; rumen fermentation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681883 PMCID: PMC9179527 DOI: 10.3390/ani12111419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Ingredient and chemical compositions of diets and individual feeds.
| Dietary Treatment | Individual Feed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Corn Grain | Beet Pulp | Concentrate | Corn Grain | Beet Pulp | Oat Straw |
| Ingredients, g/kg dry matter (DM) | - | - | - | - | ||
| Concentrate 1 | 600 | 600 | ||||
| Oat straw | 250 | 250 | ||||
| Supplemented corn grain | 150 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Supplemented beet pulp | 0 | 135 | - | - | - | - |
| Protected fat | 0 | 15 | ||||
| Total | 1000 | 1000 | ||||
| Chemical composition, g/kg | ||||||
| DM | 890 | 900 | 878 | 856 | 894 | 911 |
| Crude protein (CP) | 127 | 122 | 160 | 84.0 | 90.9 | 53.9 |
| Ether extract (EE) | 34 | 34 | 41.4 | 35.6 | 8.00 | 19.4 |
| Ash | 54 | 58 | 72.2 | 11.2 | 45.0 | 35.1 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 310 | 350 | 238 | 102 | 425 | 640 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 149 | 162 | 86.4 | 27.9 | 231 | 403 |
| Non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) 2 | 475 | 436 | 488 | 767 | 431 | 252 |
| Starch | 320 | 204 | 333 | 720 | 9.8 | 14 |
| Calcium | 91 | 100 | 13.9 | 0.20 | 8.50 | 2.10 |
| Phosphorus | 40 | 40 | 5.80 | 2.30 | 0.70 | 1.50 |
| Total digestible nutrient (TDN) 3, % | 71.8 | 69.4 | 72.7 | 85.0 | 69.1 | 55.9 |
| Metabolizable energy (ME) 4, MJ/kg | 10.6 | 10.5 | ||||
1 Ingredient of concentrate (g/kg): Steamed flaked corn 294, corn gluten feed 268, ground wheat 131, wheat flour 108, ground corn 63.7, limestone 30, molasses 28, rice bran 19.7, palm kernel meal 14, condensed molasses solubles 13.5, distiller’s dried grains with solubles 10, sodium bicarbonate 6.6, whole cottonseed 5.5, palm oil 2.2, mineral-vitamin premix 2.1, salt 2.1, ammonium chloride 1.6. Mineral and vitamin premix contained Vit. A, 2,650,000 IU; Vit. D3, 530,000 IU; Vit. E, 1050 IU; Niacin, 10,000 mg; Mn, 4400 mg; Zn, 4400 mg; Fe, 13,200 mg; Cu, 2200 mg; I, 440 mg; Co, 440 mg (Grobic-DC, Bayer Health Care, Leverkusen, Germany); 2 NFC (g/kg) = 1000 − (CP + EE + ash + NDF); 3 TDN (%) of concentrate and other individual feeds were obtained from Cargill Agri Purina, Inc. (South Korea) and NRC values of nutrient composition tables, respectively [17]; 4 ME (Mcal/kg) = 0.82 × digestible energy (DE) (Mcal/kg) [18]; 1 kg of TDN = 4.4 Mcal of DE [18].
Effects of feeding beet pulp in replacement of corn grain on growth performance of Korean cattle steers.
| Items | Treatment 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | BP | SEM | ||
| Initial body weight, kg | 484 | 485 | 5.37 | 0.98 |
| Final body weight, kg | 558 | 564 | 5.70 | 0.90 |
| Average daily gain, kg | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.040 | 0.55 |
| Total dry matter (DM) intake 2, kg/d | 7.80 | 7.47 | 0.207 | 0.45 |
| Concentrate DM intake, kg/d | 4.75 | 4.58 | 0.153 | 0.61 |
| Supplement DM intake, kg/d | 1.23 | 1.07 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| Forage DM intake, kg/d | 1.82 | 1.82 | 0.001 | 0.33 |
| Total feed intake 2, g/kg of body weight | 15.01 | 14.39 | 0.39 | 0.28 |
| Concentrate DM intake, g/kg of body weight | 9.14 | 8.82 | 0.290 | 0.61 |
| Supplement DM intake, g/kg of body weight | 2.37 | 2.07 | 0.107 | 0.17 |
| Forage DM intake, g/kg of body weight | 3.50 | 3.50 | 0.002 | 0.67 |
| Feed efficiency (gain/feed) | 0.115 | 0.123 | 0.004 | 0.44 |
n = 6 per group; 1 treatment: CG = 20% corn grain for concentrate portion; BP = 18% beet pulp plus 2.0% protected fat for concentrate portion; 2 total intake = concentrate + supplement (corn grain or (beet pulp + rumen-protected fat)) + forage.
Effects of feeding beet pulp in replacement of corn grain on ruminal fermentation characteristics of Korean cattle steers.
| Items | Treatment 1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | BP | Mean | SEM | Treatment | Time | Treatment × Time | |
| pH | |||||||
| Week 0 | 6.54 | 6.50 | 6.52 y | 0.06 | 0.53 | 0.001 | 0.78 |
| Week 4 | 6.74 | 6.89 | 6.81 x | 0.11 | |||
| Week 8 | 6.43 | 6.57 | 6.49 y | 0.09 | |||
| Week 12 | 6.91 | 6.99 | 6.94 x | 0.09 | |||
| Ammonia nitrogen, mg/dL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 23.4 | 25.8 | 24.6 | 2.40 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.25 |
| Week 4 | 32.3 | 20.6 | 26.5 | 1.70 | |||
| Week 8 | 23.2 | 21.4 | 22.3 | 2.29 | |||
| Week 12 | 19.2 | 26.9 | 23.1 | 5.70 | |||
| Total volatile fatty acid, mM | |||||||
| Week 0 | 112 | 111 | 111 | 6.60 | 0.83 | 0.28 | 0.64 |
| Week 4 | 123 | 125 | 124 | 5.40 | |||
| Week 8 | 127 | 122 | 124 | 5.70 | |||
| Week 12 | 109 | 123 | 115 | 9.20 | |||
| Acetate, mol/100 mol | |||||||
| Week 0 | 59.2 | 58.8 | 59.0 z | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Week 4 | 60.0 b | 63.4 a | 61.7 y | 0.62 | |||
| Week 8 | 62.8 | 64.2 | 63.5 x | 0.51 | |||
| Week 12 | 62.9 | 64.1 | 63.5 x | 0.51 | |||
| Propionate, mol/100 mol | |||||||
| Week 0 | 17.5 | 17.9 | 17.7 y | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 0.07 |
| Week 4 | 17.9 | 16.2 | 17.1 y | 0.57 | |||
| Week 8 | 22.2 a | 19.7 b | 20.9 x | 0.55 | |||
| Week 12 | 21.8 a | 19.7 b | 20.8 x | 0.45 | |||
| Butyrate, mol/100 mol | |||||||
| Week 0 | 16.3 | 15.6 | 15.9 x | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.001 | 0.07 |
| Week 4 | 16.2 a | 13.4 b | 14.8 y | 0.01 | |||
| Week 8 | 12.0 | 13.4 | 12.7 y | 0.01 | |||
| Week 12 | 12.3 | 13.4 | 12.9 y | 0.01 | |||
| Acetate to propionate ratio | |||||||
| Week 0 | 3.40 | 3.32 | 3.36 y | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Week 4 | 3.37 a | 3.98 a | 3.67 x | 0.15 | |||
| Week 8 | 2.85 b | 3.28 a | 3.06 y | 0.09 | |||
| Week 12 | 2.89 b | 3.26 a | 3.08 y | 0.08 | |||
n = 6 per group; 1 treatment: CG = 15% corn grain for concentrate portion; BP = 13.5% beet pulp plus 1.5% protected fat for concentrate portion; a, b mean values with different letters in the same row differ (p < 0.05); x, y, z mean values with different letters in the same column differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Effects of feeding corn grain (CG) or beet pulp (BP) on the ruminal population of cellulolytic bacteria, amylolytic bacteria, lipolytic bacteria, methanogens, total protozoa, and total fungi in Korean cattle steers. The microbial population was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using the total bacterial 16S rRNA gene as the reference gene. Fold difference of the CG group value of each bacterium for each week was normalized to 1.0-fold. Values are fold difference + standard error: F. succinogenes = Fibrobacter succinogenes; R. albus = Ruminococcus albus; R. flavefaciens = Ruminococcus flavefaciens; S. amylolytica = Succinimonas amylolytica; R. amylophilus = Ruminobacter amylophilus; S. bovis = Streptococcus bovis; A. lipolytica = Anaerovibrio lipolytica. Microbial population was not different (p > 0.05) if no p-value indicated.
Effects of feeding beet pulp in replacement of corn grain on blood metabolites of Korean cattle steers.
| Item | Treatment 1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | BP | Mean | SEM | Treatment | Time | Treatment × Time | |
| Glucose, mg/dL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 80.8 | 79.2 | 80.0 | 2.36 | 0.99 | 0.09 | 0.76 |
| Week 4 | 73.5 | 74.8 | 74.1 | 1.18 | |||
| Week 8 | 77.2 | 76.2 | 76.7 | 2.42 | |||
| Week 12 | 74.7 | 75.0 | 74.8 | 1.19 | |||
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 23.3 | 20.7 | 22.0 y | 1.29 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.88 |
| Week 4 | 24.3 | 19.7 | 22.0 y | 1.71 | |||
| Week 8 | 23.0 | 20.3 | 21.7 y | 1.70 | |||
| Week 12 | 18.8 | 16.0 | 17.4 x | 1.00 | |||
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 130 | 123 | 127 y | 6.2 | 0.44 | 0.001 | 0.02 |
| Week 4 | 158 | 145 | 151 y | 10.9 | |||
| Week 8 | 175 | 209 | 192 x | 11.6 | |||
| Week 12 | 170 b | 202 a | 156 x | 9.6 | |||
| Nonesterified fatty acids, mg/dL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 134 | 137 | 136 x | 9.1 | 0.10 | 0.004 | 0.15 |
| Week 4 | 105 | 90.5 | 98.3 y | 5.9 | |||
| Week 8 | 130 | 108 | 120 x | 14.5 | |||
| Week 12 | 173 a | 119 b | 148 x | 11.1 | |||
| Mean | 135 a | 114 b | |||||
| Leptin, ng/mL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 9.79 | 9.01 | 9.40 x | 0.450 | 0.49 | 0.0008 | 0.94 |
| Week 4 | 7.20 | 7.19 | 7.17 y, z | 0.673 | |||
| Week 8 | 6.23 | 5.55 | 5.89 y | 0.458 | |||
| Week 12 | 8.65 | 8.64 | 8.65 x, z | 0.500 | |||
| Insulin, ng/mL | |||||||
| Week 0 | 1.08 | 1.27 | 1.18 x | 0.142 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.27 |
| Week 4 | 1.16 | 1.54 | 1.35 x | 0.136 | |||
| Week 8 | 0.55 | 0.84 | 0.70 y | 0.082 | |||
| Week 12 | 0.79 b | 1.52 a | 1.15 x | 0.152 | |||
| Mean | 0.90 b | 1.29 a | |||||
n = 6 per group; 1 treatment: CG = 15% corn grain for concentrate portion; BP = 13.5% beet pulp plus 1.5% protected fat for concentrate portion; a, b mean values with different letters in the same row differ (p < 0.05); x, y, z mean values with different letters in the same column differ (p < 0.05).